Where it is used
Each entry identifies the volume, edition, chapter or appendix in which the work appears.
The evidence behind the series
Browse the scientific research and professional literature used across all seven volumes of The Science of Learning for Educators.
Search the collection
Choose an author range, search a title or concept, or narrow the collection by source type. Open any result to see where it appears in the books, read its evidence summary and follow available source links.
3 references
Azevedo and Cromley tested whether explicit self-regulated learning training improves learning from hypermedia. They randomly assigned 131 undergraduates to a training or control condition before students used a hypermedia environment to learn about the circulatory system.
The intervention provided 30 minutes of instruction in specific, research-based regulatory processes; the control group received no such training. Pretests, posttests, and verbal protocols captured both conceptual change and learners' activity during study. Students who received training showed significantly greater shifts toward more sophisticated mental models. Their verbal protocols connected this advantage to use of the strategies taught in training.
The study demonstrates that learners do not necessarily regulate effectively merely because a digital environment permits flexible navigation. Brief, targeted instruction can change how students plan, monitor, and process information, with measurable effects on conceptual understanding.
View or buy the cited work >>Read a similar article free online >>
This National Research Council synthesis connects findings about cognition, development, neuroscience, and classroom learning. It describes expertise as organised, conceptually connected knowledge that supports recognition and transfer, not simply a larger store of facts.
Learners enter instruction with prior knowledge and beliefs that shape new understanding; teaching must therefore elicit and work with existing conceptions. Metacognitive approaches help students plan, monitor, and revise their learning. The book characterises effective environments as learner-centred, knowledge-centred, assessment-centred, and community-centred, with these dimensions designed coherently. It also examines children’s learning, brain development, teacher learning, and educational technology.
For educators, the synthesis supports building deep disciplinary structures, making thinking visible through formative assessment, cultivating metacognition, and designing supportive communities in which knowledge can be applied beyond the original lesson.
Bruner's classic argument for curriculum reform proposes that the fundamental structure of any subject can be taught in an intellectually honest form at any stage of development when representation and support are appropriate.
Learning should organise facts around powerful principles so that knowledge becomes understandable, memorable, and transferable. A spiral curriculum revisits central ideas repeatedly, each time at a more complex or formal level, rather than treating topics as finished after one encounter. Bruner also examines intuitive thinking, motivation, readiness, and the role of teaching aids. The claim is not that every version of a topic suits every learner, but that curriculum designers can represent important ideas in developmentally accessible ways and progressively refine them.
For educators, the book supports identifying generative disciplinary concepts, sequencing repeated encounters, connecting new detail to prior structure, encouraging conjecture and discovery, and balancing intuitive insight with increasingly explicit analysis.
View or buy the cited work >>Read a similar article free online >>
A transparent research trail
Each entry identifies the volume, edition, chapter or appendix in which the work appears.
Evidence summaries explain the central idea and why the source matters to educators.
Entries link to lawful full text where available, or to a publisher, library or purchase page.
References are checked against publisher records, scholarly indexes, DOI or ISBN metadata, repositories and author records where available. An entry marked [Citation not verified] preserves the wording found in the relevant volume without attributing findings to an unconfirmed work.
From sources to a coherent pathway