Where it is used
Each entry identifies the volume, edition, chapter or appendix in which the work appears.
The evidence behind the series
Browse the scientific research and professional literature used across all seven volumes of The Science of Learning for Educators.
Search the collection
Choose an author range, search a title or concept, or narrow the collection by source type. Open any result to see where it appears in the books, read its evidence summary and follow available source links.
1 reference
Chi, Feltovich, and Glaser compare how physics experts and novices categorise and represent mechanics problems.
In sorting and think-aloud studies, experts grouped problems by underlying principles and solution structures, such as conservation of energy or Newton's laws. Novices relied more heavily on literal surface features, such as whether a problem mentioned an inclined plane, spring, or pulley. The difference was not simply the amount of knowledge: experts' categories activated connected conceptual and procedural knowledge that guided solution planning, while novice representations often lacked this organisation. Surface cues can still affect experts, and developing expertise is gradual.
For educators, the findings support teaching students to identify governing principles before selecting equations, comparing problems with different contexts but common structures, explaining categorisation decisions, and using sorting tasks to reveal how learners organise disciplinary knowledge.
A transparent research trail
Each entry identifies the volume, edition, chapter or appendix in which the work appears.
Evidence summaries explain the central idea and why the source matters to educators.
Entries link to lawful full text where available, or to a publisher, library or purchase page.
References are checked against publisher records, scholarly indexes, DOI or ISBN metadata, repositories and author records where available. An entry marked [Citation not verified] preserves the wording found in the relevant volume without attributing findings to an unconfirmed work.
From sources to a coherent pathway