Where it is used
Each entry identifies the volume, edition, chapter or appendix in which the work appears.
The evidence behind the series
Follow the research.
Explore every source.
Browse the scientific research and professional literature used across all seven volumes of The Science of Learning for Educators.
7book volumes
8author ranges
1searchable library
Search the collection
Find a paper, author or idea.
Choose an author range, search a title or concept, or narrow the collection by source type. Open any result to see where it appears in the books, read its evidence summary and follow available source links.
4 references
-
- Vol 5 TE: App C
instructional rubricsself-assessmentassessment criteriaquality standardsformative feedbackstudent revisionexemplarsmetacognitive thinkingJournal article Evidence summaryAt a glance
Andrade argues that instructional rubrics can support teaching and learning, not merely score finished work. A useful rubric identifies important criteria and describes gradations of quality in language students can understand.
Key ideas
When learners examine examples, help articulate criteria, and apply a rubric to their own drafts, expectations become visible and feedback becomes more actionable. The article illustrates a self-assessment process in which students mark evidence in their writing against each criterion and use what they notice to revise. Rubrics therefore promote thinking when they direct attention to quality, support dialogue about standards, and become tools students use during production. Andrade cautions implicitly against treating a rubric as a checklist or grading device alone.
Why it matters
For teachers, the practical sequence is to co-construct or explain criteria, study models, practise applying the rubric, and give students time to revise.
-
- Vol 4 RE: Chapters 10, 14, 17, App A, App C
project-based learningauthentic assessmentstudent agencycollaborative problem solvingproject planningformative feedbackauthentic audiencesself-managementJournal article Evidence summaryAt a glance
Bell presents project-based learning as a student-driven approach in which learners investigate a meaningful question over time and create a product or performance.
Key ideas
Projects require inquiry, planning, research, collaboration, problem solving, technology use, and revision, allowing subject knowledge to develop alongside communication and self-management. The teacher establishes standards and milestones, teaches needed skills, monitors progress, and provides feedback rather than withdrawing guidance. Choice and authentic audiences can increase ownership, while teamwork makes participation and accountability important design concerns. The article connects these features with skills frequently described as necessary for contemporary study, work, and civic life.
Why it matters
For educators, its practical message is to align projects with explicit curriculum outcomes, assess both process and product, build in checkpoints and reflection, and scaffold independence so that engaging activity results in substantive learning.
-
- Vol 3 RE: Chapters 14, 16
classroom assessmentpedagogical decision-makingformative feedbacklearner agencyclassroom discoursetask designteacher judgmentJournal article Evidence summaryAt a glance
Black and Wiliam embed classroom assessment within a theory of pedagogy rather than treating it as a separate set of techniques.
Key ideas
They analyse teaching as the creation and regulation of learning environments in which teachers, peers, and learners make contingent decisions. Assessment evidence matters because it informs those decisions, while curriculum, task design, classroom discourse, and relationships shape what evidence can be produced and how it is used. The article examines the roles of feedback, learner agency, disciplinary content, and teachers' professional judgment, arguing that formative practice cannot be reduced to generic routines. For educators, it recommends designing tasks and dialogue that expose relevant thinking, interpreting responses through knowledge of the subject and learner, and adapting instruction while preserving meaningful educational aims.
Why it matters
Assessment quality is therefore inseparable from pedagogical quality.
-
- Vol 5 RE: Chapter 10
- Vol 5 TE: App C
formative feedbackfeedback timingfeedback specificitytask-focused feedbackprocess-focused feedbackself-regulationstudent revisionfeedback useBook Evidence summaryAt a glance
Brookhart presents feedback as information that helps students understand a learning goal, judge their current work, and decide what to do next.
Key ideas
Effective feedback is timely enough to be used, specific without doing the thinking for the learner, and expressed in language the student can understand. It should focus on the task, the process used, or productive self-regulation rather than praise, comparison, or fixed personal qualities. The second edition examines feedback at several scales: individual oral and written comments, an episode of learning in which students act on information, and longer-term effects on learning and motivation. For educators, the book recommends matching amount and mode to the learner and task, describing strengths and a manageable next step, and building immediate opportunities for revision.
Why it matters
Feedback succeeds only when students interpret and use it to extend learning.
View or buy the cited work >>Read a similar article free online >>
A transparent research trail
More than a bibliography.
What it contributes
Evidence summaries explain the central idea and why the source matters to educators.
How to access it
Entries link to lawful full text where available, or to a publisher, library or purchase page.
Edition abbreviations
- TE
- Teacher Edition
- PE
- Practice Edition
- RE
- Research Edition
Citation checks
References are checked against publisher records, scholarly indexes, DOI or ISBN metadata, repositories and author records where available. An entry marked [Citation not verified] preserves the wording found in the relevant volume without attributing findings to an unconfirmed work.
From sources to a coherent pathway