Where it is used
Each entry identifies the volume, edition, chapter or appendix in which the work appears.
The evidence behind the series
Browse the scientific research and professional literature used across all seven volumes of The Science of Learning for Educators.
Search the collection
Choose an author range, search a title or concept, or narrow the collection by source type. Open any result to see where it appears in the books, read its evidence summary and follow available source links.
2 references
Bereiter argues that education needs a conception of mind and knowledge suited to societies in which creating and improving knowledge is central.
He distinguishes learning, understood as change in an individual's mental state, from knowledge building, understood as deliberate work on ideas that exist as public, improvable objects. Drawing on Popper's account of objective knowledge, the book treats theories, explanations, designs, and problems as conceptual artefacts communities can criticise and advance. Schools often remain focused on tasks, coverage, and individual achievement, whereas knowledge-building communities take collective responsibility for improving understanding. Technology can support this work but does not create the culture by itself.
For educators, the book recommends sustained work on authentic problems, visible communal ideas, explanation and theory improvement, epistemic agency, and assessment of progress in the quality and coherence of knowledge.
View or buy the cited work >>Read a similar article free online >>
Bereiter and Scardamalia compare knowledge building in education with knowledge creation in organisations.
Both involve purposeful creation and improvement of ideas, but they face different hills to climb. Education must move beyond treating knowledge as something students privately acquire and establish communities in which even young learners have epistemic agency and collective responsibility for advancing explanations. Organisational research must move beyond describing knowledge sharing or innovation outcomes and explain how sustained work with conceptual objects produces genuinely new knowledge. The authors argue that learning may result from knowledge building, but individual learning is not its defining objective; the public improvement of ideas is.
For educators, the chapter clarifies why discussion or collaboration alone is insufficient: students need shared problems, improvable theories, evidence, constructive criticism, and tools that preserve the history of communal idea development.
A transparent research trail
Each entry identifies the volume, edition, chapter or appendix in which the work appears.
Evidence summaries explain the central idea and why the source matters to educators.
Entries link to lawful full text where available, or to a publisher, library or purchase page.
References are checked against publisher records, scholarly indexes, DOI or ISBN metadata, repositories and author records where available. An entry marked [Citation not verified] preserves the wording found in the relevant volume without attributing findings to an unconfirmed work.
From sources to a coherent pathway