Where it is used
Each entry identifies the volume, edition, chapter or appendix in which the work appears.
The evidence behind the series
Follow the research.
Explore every source.
Browse the scientific research and professional literature used across all seven volumes of The Science of Learning for Educators.
7book volumes
8author ranges
1searchable library
Search the collection
Find a paper, author or idea.
Choose an author range, search a title or concept, or narrow the collection by source type. Open any result to see where it appears in the books, read its evidence summary and follow available source links.
2 references
-
- Vol 7 PE: App D
- Vol 7 RE: Chapter 8
flipped classroomcomputer-based instructioninteractive group learningactive learningproblem-based learningstudent perceptionslearning outcomesresearch design limitationsConference paper Evidence summaryAt a glance
Bishop and Verleger define the flipped classroom narrowly as computer-based individual instruction outside class combined with interactive, group-based learning inside class.
Key ideas
This separates flipping from related practices that merely provide videos or rearrange homework. Their survey connects the model with contrasting theoretical traditions: direct instruction can structure initial explanations, while constructivist and problem-based approaches inform active classroom work. Reviewing the small empirical literature then available, they find generally positive student perceptions but limited rigorous evidence about learning outcomes. Many studies used single-group designs, local implementations, or different definitions, making broad causal claims premature.
Why it matters
For educators, the paper's enduring value is conceptual clarity: the benefit should not be attributed to video itself but tested through the quality of preparation, accountability, in-class tasks, feedback, and comparison with credible alternatives.
-
- Vol 5 RE: Chapter 15
lifelong learning scenarioslearning outcomes transparencylearning outcomes transferabilityqualifications recognitionlearning mobilityquality assurancescenario planninglearning pathway permeabilityReport Evidence summaryAt a glance
Cedefop presents five alternative scenarios for European lifelong learning to 2040, focusing on the transparency and transferability of learning outcomes.
Key ideas
The scenarios combine evidence about two decades of policy development with social, technological, economic, environmental, and political drivers. They are not predictions; they explore different balances between flexibility and permeability, on one hand, and stability and predictability, on the other. Each future raises consequences for learners, education and training providers, qualifications, recognition, mobility, quality assurance, and national and European coordination. The report uses scenario thinking to expose assumptions and trade-offs before decisions become fixed.
Why it matters
For policy makers and educational leaders, it supports stress-testing current arrangements, considering who benefits or is excluded under different pathways, improving recognition and accumulation of learning, and coordinating choices that allow people to enter, leave, and re-enter learning across institutions and life stages.
A transparent research trail
More than a bibliography.
What it contributes
Evidence summaries explain the central idea and why the source matters to educators.
How to access it
Entries link to lawful full text where available, or to a publisher, library or purchase page.
Edition abbreviations
- TE
- Teacher Edition
- PE
- Practice Edition
- RE
- Research Edition
Citation checks
References are checked against publisher records, scholarly indexes, DOI or ISBN metadata, repositories and author records where available. An entry marked [Citation not verified] preserves the wording found in the relevant volume without attributing findings to an unconfirmed work.
From sources to a coherent pathway