Where it is used
Each entry identifies the volume, edition, chapter or appendix in which the work appears.
The evidence behind the series
Browse the scientific research and professional literature used across all seven volumes of The Science of Learning for Educators.
Search the collection
Choose an author range, search a title or concept, or narrow the collection by source type. Open any result to see where it appears in the books, read its evidence summary and follow available source links.
3 references
Alexander presents educational psychology through problems that matter directly to teaching rather than as a catalogue of separate psychological theories.
The book compares cognitive, developmental, motivational, social, and sociocultural perspectives and applies them to knowledge acquisition, transfer, strategic processing, assessment, and classroom learning. A recurring concern is how learners' prior knowledge, beliefs, goals, interests, and strategies interact with instructional conditions. The text helps readers see that no single theory explains every educational situation and that sound instruction requires selecting concepts that fit the learner, content, and task. For educators, its practical value lies in connecting psychological research to decisions about explanation, practice, motivation, evaluation, and support for increasingly independent learning.
It is an integrative textbook rather than a report of one study.
View or buy the cited work >>Read a similar article free online >>
Ausubel presents a cognitive theory of classroom learning built around the learner's existing knowledge structure.
New information is learned meaningfully when it can be related to relevant concepts already understood; rote learning occurs when material is stored with few substantive connections. The teacher's task is therefore to diagnose prior knowledge, organise subject matter from broad inclusive ideas toward greater detail, and help learners reconcile similarities, differences, and apparent contradictions. Advance organisers provide a conceptual bridge before instruction, preparing relevant ideas to which unfamiliar material can attach. Ausubel distinguishes meaningful reception learning from passive memorisation: well-structured explanation can demand active cognitive integration even when information is presented directly.
For educators, the book's enduring implication is to begin from what students know, make conceptual relationships explicit, and design sequences that progressively differentiate and integrate knowledge rather than presenting isolated facts.
View or buy the cited work >>Read a similar article free online >>
This National Research Council synthesis connects findings about cognition, development, neuroscience, and classroom learning. It describes expertise as organised, conceptually connected knowledge that supports recognition and transfer, not simply a larger store of facts.
Learners enter instruction with prior knowledge and beliefs that shape new understanding; teaching must therefore elicit and work with existing conceptions. Metacognitive approaches help students plan, monitor, and revise their learning. The book characterises effective environments as learner-centred, knowledge-centred, assessment-centred, and community-centred, with these dimensions designed coherently. It also examines children’s learning, brain development, teacher learning, and educational technology.
For educators, the synthesis supports building deep disciplinary structures, making thinking visible through formative assessment, cultivating metacognition, and designing supportive communities in which knowledge can be applied beyond the original lesson.
A transparent research trail
Each entry identifies the volume, edition, chapter or appendix in which the work appears.
Evidence summaries explain the central idea and why the source matters to educators.
Entries link to lawful full text where available, or to a publisher, library or purchase page.
References are checked against publisher records, scholarly indexes, DOI or ISBN metadata, repositories and author records where available. An entry marked [Citation not verified] preserves the wording found in the relevant volume without attributing findings to an unconfirmed work.
From sources to a coherent pathway