Where it is used
Each entry identifies the volume, edition, chapter or appendix in which the work appears.
The evidence behind the series
Follow the research.
Explore every source.
Browse the scientific research and professional literature used across all seven volumes of The Science of Learning for Educators.
7book volumes
8author ranges
1searchable library
Search the collection
Find a paper, author or idea.
Choose an author range, search a title or concept, or narrow the collection by source type. Open any result to see where it appears in the books, read its evidence summary and follow available source links.
5 references
-
- Vol 6 RE: Chapter 5, App D, App E
distributed leadershipprofessional learning networkscollective actionshared decision-makingknowledge exchangenetwork participationJournal article Evidence summaryAt a glance
Azorín, Harris, and Jones examine leadership in professional learning networks through a distributed-leadership lens. They argue that effective networks depend on collective action across formal and informal roles rather than on a single designated leader.
Key ideas
Leadership work includes establishing shared purposes, building trust, connecting participants, enabling knowledge exchange, coordinating activity, and sustaining engagement across organizational boundaries. The article also identifies difficulties: network goals can remain vague, participation and influence may be uneven, collaboration requires time, and practices developed in the network do not automatically transfer into members’ schools. A distributed perspective helps researchers ask who performs particular leadership functions, how expertise and authority move, and which social interactions support or constrain joint work. The article is primarily conceptual and synthetic, so it frames questions rather than proving that networks reliably improve student outcomes.
Why it matters
For practice, it suggests designing explicit structures for shared decision-making, inquiry, communication, and follow-through while retaining enough flexibility for leadership to emerge from relevant expertise.
View or buy the cited work >>Read a similar article free online >>
-
- Vol 5 RE: Chapter 4
formative assessmentassessment validitydomain-specific assessmentdiagnostic evidenceteacher knowledgeassessment systemscurriculum alignmentprofessional learningJournal article Evidence summaryAt a glance
Bennett critically examines six connected problems in formative assessment: inconsistent definitions, strong effectiveness claims based on a limited evidence base, insufficient attention to subject domains, weak integration of measurement principles, substantial demands on teacher knowledge and support, and tensions with the wider assessment system.
Key ideas
He argues that formative assessment is not one well-defined intervention, so effects cannot be assumed to transfer across practices or contexts. Useful evidence must be interpreted through a model of how learning develops in a domain, and teachers need tools that elicit diagnostically meaningful information and support appropriate action.
Why it matters
For educators and policymakers, the review recommends treating formative assessment as part of a coherent learning system in which curriculum, instruction, professional learning, classroom evidence, and external assessment work together rather than promoting isolated techniques.
-
- Vol 4 RE: Chapter 12
social-emotional learningemotional intelligenceemotion regulationschoolwide implementationteacher professional learningschool climateemotional competencetheory of changeJournal article Evidence summaryAt a glance
Brackett and colleagues describe RULER as a theory-driven, schoolwide approach that integrates social, emotional, and academic learning rather than treating emotional skills as a stand-alone lesson.
Key ideas
The framework is grounded in emotional-intelligence theory and organizes learning around recognizing, understanding, labeling, expressing, and regulating emotion. Implementation includes professional learning for adults, shared tools and routines, classroom instruction, and practices intended to influence relationships and school climate. The authors explain how emotions affect attention, memory, decision-making, health, and the quality of teaching and learning, making adult competence and organizational support central to the model. They also review the program’s theory of change and available evidence while identifying questions for further research and implementation.
Why it matters
For educators, the article’s main implication is systemic: durable social-emotional learning requires common language, repeated practice, supportive leadership, and alignment across classrooms and the wider school, rather than isolated activities delivered only to students.
View or buy the cited work >>Read a similar article free online >>
-
- Vol 6 RE: Chapters 7, 9, 10, 11, 12, 14, App D
professional learning networkscollaborative inquiryteacher design teamsknowledge mobilisationnetwork leadershipboundary crossingnetwork sustainabilityBook Evidence summaryAt a glance
Brown and Poortman's edited volume examines professional learning networks as structures for teacher development and school and system improvement.
Key ideas
International cases include research-learning networks, teacher design teams, data teams, lesson study, communities of pedagogical inquiry, interschool networks, and system-wide educational landscapes. Across these forms, productive networks do more than connect people: they create purposeful inquiry, generate and circulate knowledge, give participants agency, and link collaboration to changes in practice. The chapters also address leadership, evidence use, relationships, boundary crossing, impact, and long-term sustainability. Networks can fail when participation is superficial, purposes are unclear, knowledge remains local, or support disappears.
Why it matters
For educators and system leaders, the collection recommends establishing a shared improvement focus, creating routines for disciplined collaborative inquiry, attending to trust and facilitation, and evaluating whether network activity changes professional knowledge, classroom practice, and learner outcomes.
View or buy the cited work >>Read a similar article free online >>
-
- Vol 6 PE: App E
instructional roundsinstructional coreproblem of practicenon-judgemental observationevidence-based debriefingprofessional learning networkscollective instructional capacityBook Evidence summaryAt a glance
City and colleagues adapt medical rounds into a disciplined network process for learning from classroom instruction.
Key ideas
Participants identify a focused problem of practice, observe multiple classrooms without evaluating individual teachers, describe evidence in specific non-judgemental language, identify patterns, predict what students are learning, and propose a next level of work connected to the organisation's improvement strategy. The instructional core—the relationship among student, teacher, and content—keeps attention on tasks and learning rather than personalities or generic impressions. Repeated rounds help educators develop a shared language and collective capacity to see instruction more accurately. The process is not a walkthrough, compliance inspection, or one-time event.
Why it matters
For leaders and teacher networks, the book recommends clear norms, confidentiality, careful observation training, evidence-based debriefing, and sustained follow-through so that rounds inform coherent professional learning and system action.
View or buy the cited work >>Read a similar article free online >>
A transparent research trail
More than a bibliography.
What it contributes
Evidence summaries explain the central idea and why the source matters to educators.
How to access it
Entries link to lawful full text where available, or to a publisher, library or purchase page.
Edition abbreviations
- TE
- Teacher Edition
- PE
- Practice Edition
- RE
- Research Edition
Citation checks
References are checked against publisher records, scholarly indexes, DOI or ISBN metadata, repositories and author records where available. An entry marked [Citation not verified] preserves the wording found in the relevant volume without attributing findings to an unconfirmed work.
From sources to a coherent pathway