Where it is used
Each entry identifies the volume, edition, chapter or appendix in which the work appears.
The evidence behind the series
Browse the scientific research and professional literature used across all seven volumes of The Science of Learning for Educators.
Search the collection
Choose an author range, search a title or concept, or narrow the collection by source type. Open any result to see where it appears in the books, read its evidence summary and follow available source links.
1 reference
Brackett, Rivers, and Salovey review emotional intelligence as a set of abilities for perceiving emotion, using emotion to support thought, understanding emotional information, and regulating emotion.
They distinguish this ability model and its performance-based measures from broader mixed or trait conceptions that combine personality, motivation, and social qualities. The review considers evidence linking emotional intelligence with personal well-being, relationships, social functioning, academic experience, and workplace performance, while noting measurement and causal limitations in the literature. Emotionally intelligent action involves integrating feeling with reasoning rather than treating the two as opposites. For educators, the article offers a framework for helping learners identify and interpret emotions, understand how feelings influence attention and decisions, and practise regulation strategies.
It also cautions that claims about emotional intelligence should be evaluated against the definition and assessment method actually used.
A transparent research trail
Each entry identifies the volume, edition, chapter or appendix in which the work appears.
Evidence summaries explain the central idea and why the source matters to educators.
Entries link to lawful full text where available, or to a publisher, library or purchase page.
References are checked against publisher records, scholarly indexes, DOI or ISBN metadata, repositories and author records where available. An entry marked [Citation not verified] preserves the wording found in the relevant volume without attributing findings to an unconfirmed work.
From sources to a coherent pathway