Where it is used
Each entry identifies the volume, edition, chapter or appendix in which the work appears.
The evidence behind the series
Follow the research.
Explore every source.
Browse the scientific research and professional literature used across all seven volumes of The Science of Learning for Educators.
7book volumes
8author ranges
1searchable library
Search the collection
Find a paper, author or idea.
Choose an author range, search a title or concept, or narrow the collection by source type. Open any result to see where it appears in the books, read its evidence summary and follow available source links.
2 references
-
- Vol 2 TE: App B
inquiry-based learningproject-based learningcooperative learningstructured inquiryscaffoldingformative assessmentindividual accountabilitymeaningful understandingBook chapter Evidence summaryAt a glance
Barron and Darling-Hammond review evidence on inquiry-based, project-based, and cooperative approaches intended to produce meaningful understanding.
Key ideas
Effective designs engage learners in authentic questions and products, but they also provide explicit goals, access to relevant knowledge, structured inquiry, scaffolding, feedback, revision, and opportunities to reflect. Cooperative learning is most productive when groups have shared goals alongside individual accountability and when participation is deliberately organised. The review cautions that minimally guided activity can leave students confused or reinforce misconceptions; active learning is not equivalent to unguided discovery. Examples show students learning disciplinary content while developing communication, collaboration, and self-management.
Why it matters
For educators, the chapter supports ambitious investigations built on careful sequencing and teaching: challenging problems should be paired with models, formative assessment, coaching, and a classroom culture in which students explain and improve their thinking.
-
- Vol 2 RE: Chapter 5
inquiry-based learningproject-based learningcooperative learningstructured inquiryscaffoldingformative assessmentindividual accountabilitymeaningful understandingBook chapter Evidence summaryAt a glance
Barron and Darling-Hammond review evidence on inquiry-based, project-based, and cooperative approaches intended to produce meaningful understanding.
Key ideas
Effective designs engage learners in authentic questions and products, but they also provide explicit goals, access to relevant knowledge, structured inquiry, scaffolding, feedback, revision, and opportunities to reflect. Cooperative learning is most productive when groups have shared goals alongside individual accountability and when participation is deliberately organised. The review cautions that minimally guided activity can leave students confused or reinforce misconceptions; active learning is not equivalent to unguided discovery. Examples show students learning disciplinary content while developing communication, collaboration, and self-management.
Why it matters
For educators, the chapter supports ambitious investigations built on careful sequencing and teaching: challenging problems should be paired with models, formative assessment, coaching, and a classroom culture in which students explain and improve their thinking.
A transparent research trail
More than a bibliography.
What it contributes
Evidence summaries explain the central idea and why the source matters to educators.
How to access it
Entries link to lawful full text where available, or to a publisher, library or purchase page.
Edition abbreviations
- TE
- Teacher Edition
- PE
- Practice Edition
- RE
- Research Edition
Citation checks
References are checked against publisher records, scholarly indexes, DOI or ISBN metadata, repositories and author records where available. An entry marked [Citation not verified] preserves the wording found in the relevant volume without attributing findings to an unconfirmed work.
From sources to a coherent pathway