Where it is used
Each entry identifies the volume, edition, chapter or appendix in which the work appears.
The evidence behind the series
Follow the research.
Explore every source.
Browse the scientific research and professional literature used across all seven volumes of The Science of Learning for Educators.
7book volumes
8author ranges
1searchable library
Search the collection
Find a paper, author or idea.
Choose an author range, search a title or concept, or narrow the collection by source type. Open any result to see where it appears in the books, read its evidence summary and follow available source links.
3 references
-
- Vol 3 RE: Chapters 7, 9
- Vol 3 TE: App C
dialogic teachingclassroom dialogueoracyargumentationstudent voiceteacher questioningprofessional developmentcollective reasoningBook Evidence summaryAt a glance
This handbook explains dialogic teaching as a principled approach to classroom interaction, not simply as increasing the amount of student talk.
Key ideas
Alexander connects classroom dialogue to views of knowledge, learning, culture, social relationships, and civic participation. The book sets out practical repertoires and indicators that teachers can adapt to circumstances, while preserving teacher agency rather than prescribing a single routine. It reviews international research and incorporates evidence from a large English trial in which the approach was paired with professional development, mentoring, planning, and video-supported reflection. It also addresses oracy, argumentation, literacy, student voice, and implementation.
Why it matters
For educators, the central implication is that productive dialogue requires purposeful questions, extended student contributions, cumulative development of ideas, and a classroom climate where reasoning can be examined collectively.
View or buy the cited work >>Read a similar article free online >>
-
- Vol 6 PE: App E
- Vol 6 RE: Chapters 1, 9, 14
student voicestudent agencystudent participationrecognised presenceeducational powerstudent knowledgereciprocal partnershiptokenismJournal article Evidence summaryAt a glance
Cook-Sather examines “student voice” as a family of approaches that reposition young people within educational research and reform.
Key ideas
The term rests on the claims that students possess distinctive knowledge about learning and schooling, that adults should respond to their perspectives, and that students should have opportunities to shape education. The article distinguishes voice as sound from voice as recognised presence and influence, showing why merely collecting opinions can leave existing power relations unchanged. It traces two important rationales—rights and respect—and analyses the varied meanings of listening, from hearing students to acting with them. Student voice is therefore neither a single method nor automatically democratic; its value depends on who may speak, who is heard, how contributions are interpreted, and whether participation changes decisions.
Why it matters
The analysis invites educators and researchers to design reciprocal structures that treat students as knowledgeable partners while critically examining tokenism, representation, authority, and responsibility.
View or buy the cited work >>Read a similar article free online >>
-
- Vol 6 RE: Chapters 7, 9, 11, 14
student agencystudent voicestudent-teacher partnershipstudent researchersyouth-led inquiryshared powerstudent expertiseconsequential participationJournal article Evidence summaryAt a glance
Cook-Sather connects student voice with agency: students should not only express views but also influence analyses, decisions, and practices in education. Drawing on studies across school contexts, she describes three broad forms of partnership.
Key ideas
Students can work with teachers to examine classroom practice, participate as researchers through youth-led or collaborative inquiry, and author or co-author accounts of teaching and learning. These roles position students alongside credentialed educators as critics and creators without removing educators’ professional responsibilities. Productive approaches require adults to share power, recognise students’ experience as expertise, and create channels through which insights lead to action. The article offers implications for teachers, principals, teacher educators, and researchers, including building regular feedback structures, involving students in professional learning, supporting student-led investigation, and widening opportunities to publish or present findings.
Why it matters
Voice becomes agency when participation is consequential, reciprocal, inclusive, and connected to educational change.
A transparent research trail
More than a bibliography.
What it contributes
Evidence summaries explain the central idea and why the source matters to educators.
How to access it
Entries link to lawful full text where available, or to a publisher, library or purchase page.
Edition abbreviations
- TE
- Teacher Edition
- PE
- Practice Edition
- RE
- Research Edition
Citation checks
References are checked against publisher records, scholarly indexes, DOI or ISBN metadata, repositories and author records where available. An entry marked [Citation not verified] preserves the wording found in the relevant volume without attributing findings to an unconfirmed work.
From sources to a coherent pathway