Where it is used
Each entry identifies the volume, edition, chapter or appendix in which the work appears.
The evidence behind the series
Browse the scientific research and professional literature used across all seven volumes of The Science of Learning for Educators.
Search the collection
Choose an author range, search a title or concept, or narrow the collection by source type. Open any result to see where it appears in the books, read its evidence summary and follow available source links.
1 reference
Argyris examines why highly successful professionals can struggle to learn from failure. Their education and career histories often reward solving external problems without requiring reflection on how their own assumptions and actions contribute to difficulty.
When challenged, they may use defensive reasoning: shifting blame, avoiding embarrassment, and keeping their governing assumptions beyond discussion. This enables single-loop learning, in which people adjust actions while leaving goals and underlying beliefs unchanged, but blocks deeper double-loop learning. Argyris argues that organisations should make reasoning visible by examining the gap between what people claim to do and the theories actually evident in their behaviour. Productive reflection tests assumptions openly and links advocacy with inquiry.
For schools and professional learning communities, the implication is that expertise alone does not ensure learning; teams need psychologically safe routines for examining their own contributions to problems and revising shared norms.
A transparent research trail
Each entry identifies the volume, edition, chapter or appendix in which the work appears.
Evidence summaries explain the central idea and why the source matters to educators.
Entries link to lawful full text where available, or to a publisher, library or purchase page.
References are checked against publisher records, scholarly indexes, DOI or ISBN metadata, repositories and author records where available. An entry marked [Citation not verified] preserves the wording found in the relevant volume without attributing findings to an unconfirmed work.
From sources to a coherent pathway