Where it is used
Each entry identifies the volume, edition, chapter or appendix in which the work appears.
The evidence behind the series
Browse the scientific research and professional literature used across all seven volumes of The Science of Learning for Educators.
Search the collection
Choose an author range, search a title or concept, or narrow the collection by source type. Open any result to see where it appears in the books, read its evidence summary and follow available source links.
1 reference
Clark reviews media-comparison research and argues that no delivery medium by itself produces learning.
Apparent advantages for television, computers, or other formats can often be explained by differences in instructional method, content, effort, time, or novelty that were confounded with the medium. A medium can affect cost, access, convenience, and the methods that are practical, but causal claims about achievement require holding the instructional method constant. The article also critiques theories that attribute learning directly to media symbol systems without isolating the psychologically active treatment. Its provocative vehicle analogy stimulated a long-running debate, and the conclusion should not be read as saying design or technology choices are irrelevant.
For researchers and educators, the paper recommends identifying the instructional mechanism, comparing equivalent methods, measuring efficiency as well as outcomes, and avoiding claims that a device or platform improves learning merely because it carries an effective activity.
A transparent research trail
Each entry identifies the volume, edition, chapter or appendix in which the work appears.
Evidence summaries explain the central idea and why the source matters to educators.
Entries link to lawful full text where available, or to a publisher, library or purchase page.
References are checked against publisher records, scholarly indexes, DOI or ISBN metadata, repositories and author records where available. An entry marked [Citation not verified] preserves the wording found in the relevant volume without attributing findings to an unconfirmed work.
From sources to a coherent pathway