Where it is used
Each entry identifies the volume, edition, chapter or appendix in which the work appears.
The evidence behind the series
Follow the research.
Explore every source.
Browse the scientific research and professional literature used across all seven volumes of The Science of Learning for Educators.
7book volumes
8author ranges
1searchable library
Search the collection
Find a paper, author or idea.
Choose an author range, search a title or concept, or narrow the collection by source type. Open any result to see where it appears in the books, read its evidence summary and follow available source links.
117 references
-
- Vol 6 RE: Chapters 9, 10, 11, 14, App A, App D, App E
research-practice partnershipseducational improvementdesign-research partnershipsnetworked improvement communitiesmutualismcollaborative inquirypartnership governanceevidence-informed practiceReport Evidence summaryAt a glance
Coburn, Penuel, and Geil define research–practice partnerships as long-term collaborations organised around persistent problems of educational practice and committed to producing knowledge that informs improvement.
Key ideas
Drawing on district partnerships, they distinguish research alliances, design-research partnerships, and networked improvement communities while noting shared features such as mutualism, sustained interaction, and intentionally organised work. The report examines challenges involving trust, authority, differing timelines and incentives, staff turnover, data access, funding, and the negotiation of useful questions. Productive partnerships do not simply transfer findings from researchers to practitioners; participants jointly frame problems, interpret evidence, and develop capacity on both sides.
Why it matters
For districts and researchers, the paper recommends establishing governance and communication routines, clarifying roles, investing in relationships, protecting continuity, and judging success through both rigorous knowledge and practical contribution.
-
- Vol 6 PE: App E
- Vol 6 RE: Chapter 7
knowledge-for-practiceknowledge-in-practiceknowledge-of-practiceteacher inquiryprofessional communitiessituated judgementpractitioner knowledgecollective examinationJournal article Evidence summaryAt a glance
Cochran-Smith and Lytle analyse three conceptions of how teacher knowledge relates to practice. Knowledge-for-practice treats formal research and expert theory as a body teachers apply.
Key ideas
Knowledge-in-practice locates essential knowledge in accomplished teachers’ situated judgement and reflection. Knowledge-of-practice positions teachers as generators of knowledge who systematically investigate classrooms and connect local inquiry with broader social, cultural, and political questions. The authors argue that professional communities are not automatically educative: their purposes, discourse, power relations, and stance toward knowledge determine what learning becomes possible. Inquiry communities can challenge conventional divisions between researchers and practitioners and make teaching, learning, curriculum, and equity open to collective examination.
Why it matters
For professional learning, the review supports sustained collaborative inquiry using classroom evidence, critical engagement with external research, public sharing of practitioner knowledge, and attention to the assumptions and consequences embedded in routine practice.
-
- Vol 6 RE: Chapters 7, 10, App D, App E
inquiry as stancepractitioner researchcollaborative inquiryteacher knowledgecritical scholarshipeducational equityinstitutional changepublic knowledgeBook Evidence summaryAt a glance
Cochran-Smith and Lytle present inquiry as stance not as a temporary project or classroom technique but as a persistent orientation toward teaching, knowledge, and educational change.
Key ideas
Practitioner researchers pose questions arising from local work, collect and interpret evidence, engage critically with formal research, and make their learning public within communities. Inquiry joins professional learning with efforts to examine inequity, institutional arrangements, curriculum, and the purposes of schooling. The book combines theoretical essays, cases of practitioner research, and practitioners’ voices to show inquiry across classrooms, schools, teacher education, and networks. It resists the assumption that university researchers produce knowledge while teachers merely implement it.
Why it matters
For educators and leaders, the approach supports providing time and structures for collaborative investigation, treating uncertainty as generative, connecting local questions with wider scholarship and communities, and using inquiry to transform both practice and the conditions surrounding it.
View or buy the cited work >>Read a similar article free online >>
-
- Vol 6 RE: Chapter 1
autonomy supportteacher-student relatednessworkplace buoyancyorganisational commitmentself-determinationteacher motivationteaching conditionsgender similaritiesJournal article Evidence summaryAt a glance
Collie, Bostwick, and Martin examine relationships among teachers’ perceived autonomy support, relatedness with students, workplace buoyancy, and organisational commitment, asking whether these patterns differ by gender. Structural equation modelling with 276 Australian secondary teachers showed substantial similarity for women and men.
Key ideas
Perceived autonomy support predicted stronger relatedness with students, and both resources were positively associated with organisational commitment. Workplace buoyancy—the capacity to manage ordinary work setbacks—also formed part of the motivational pattern. Some gender differences appeared, but the predominant result was commonality rather than fundamentally different processes. The study applies self-determination and workplace-motivation perspectives to teachers’ professional functioning.
Why it matters
For school leaders, the findings support practices that acknowledge teachers’ perspectives, provide meaningful choice within clear responsibilities, strengthen constructive teacher–student relationships, and build capacity to handle everyday pressures, while avoiding assumptions that support should be designed from broad gender stereotypes.
-
- Vol 6 RE: Chapters 4, 6, App E
workplace demandsworkplace resourcesoccupational wellbeingteacher engagementteacher exhaustionperson-centred analysisprofessional voiceteaching self-efficacyJournal article Evidence summaryAt a glance
Collie and colleagues examine how combinations of workplace demands and resources are associated with teachers’ occupational wellbeing. Using TALIS 2013 data from 6,411 teachers in 369 Australian schools and 2,400 teachers in 154 English schools, they model profiles based on barriers to professional development, disruptive student behaviour, teacher collaboration, input into decision-making, and teaching self-efficacy.
Key ideas
The person-centred approach shows that demands and resources cluster in meaningfully different patterns rather than operating as isolated variables. Teachers in profiles with stronger resources and fewer demands generally report more positive work-related outcomes, including greater engagement and lower exhaustion or disengagement, while demanding conditions combined with limited resources are less favourable. School context also contributes to how profiles are distributed. The study is observational and based on self-report, so it does not establish that collaboration or decision input causes wellbeing.
Why it matters
Its practical implication is that supporting teachers requires coordinated attention to workload-related pressures, professional voice, collegial resources, and confidence, not a single generic wellbeing intervention.
-
- Vol 6 RE: Chapter 6
school climatesocial-emotional learningteacher stressjob satisfactionteaching efficacystudent behaviourteacher collaborationorganisational supportJournal article Evidence summaryAt a glance
Collie, Shapka, and Perry investigate how teachers’ perceptions of school climate and social-emotional learning relate to workload stress, student-behaviour stress, job satisfaction, and teaching efficacy.
Key ideas
Survey data from 664 Canadian elementary and secondary teachers were analysed with structural equation modelling. Teachers’ comfort with implementing social-emotional learning was especially important, while perceptions of students’ motivation and behaviour were prominent among school-climate factors. The outcomes were interconnected: stress related negatively to satisfaction and efficacy, whereas supportive conditions and confidence around social-emotional learning related to more adaptive professional experiences. Because the design is correlational, the model does not establish one-way causation, and perceptions may influence one another.
Why it matters
For leaders, the study supports developing a coherent social-emotional learning culture, preparing teachers to implement it, strengthening collaboration and student support, and addressing organisational and behavioural conditions rather than treating teacher stress solely as an individual coping problem.
-
- Vol 2 RE: Chapter 5
project-based learningauthentic questionsknowledge constructioninquiry scaffoldingassessment practicesteacher facilitationimplementation fidelitydeeper learningReport Evidence summaryAt a glance
Condliffe and colleagues review research on project-based learning in K–12 education published mainly since 2000.
Key ideas
They describe recurring design principles: a project serves as the central vehicle for instruction, students actively construct knowledge, work often addresses authentic questions, and assessment extends beyond conventional tests. Yet models differ in duration, student choice, collaboration, and the relationship between projects and other teaching methods, making implementation fidelity difficult to define. Teachers must shift toward facilitation, manage more complex classroom activity, scaffold inquiry, and use technology purposefully; sustained professional development and supportive school conditions are therefore important. Evidence for improved outcomes is promising but not conclusive, with stronger findings in some science and social-studies settings than in mathematics or literacy.
Why it matters
The review calls for clearer models, stronger measures of deeper learning, more rigorous comparative studies, and better documentation of implementation.
-
- Vol 6 PE: App E
- Vol 6 RE: Chapters 1, 9, 14
student voicestudent agencystudent participationrecognised presenceeducational powerstudent knowledgereciprocal partnershiptokenismJournal article Evidence summaryAt a glance
Cook-Sather examines “student voice” as a family of approaches that reposition young people within educational research and reform.
Key ideas
The term rests on the claims that students possess distinctive knowledge about learning and schooling, that adults should respond to their perspectives, and that students should have opportunities to shape education. The article distinguishes voice as sound from voice as recognised presence and influence, showing why merely collecting opinions can leave existing power relations unchanged. It traces two important rationales—rights and respect—and analyses the varied meanings of listening, from hearing students to acting with them. Student voice is therefore neither a single method nor automatically democratic; its value depends on who may speak, who is heard, how contributions are interpreted, and whether participation changes decisions.
Why it matters
The analysis invites educators and researchers to design reciprocal structures that treat students as knowledgeable partners while critically examining tokenism, representation, authority, and responsibility.
View or buy the cited work >>Read a similar article free online >>
-
- Vol 6 RE: Chapters 7, 9, 11, 14
student agencystudent voicestudent-teacher partnershipstudent researchersyouth-led inquiryshared powerstudent expertiseconsequential participationJournal article Evidence summaryAt a glance
Cook-Sather connects student voice with agency: students should not only express views but also influence analyses, decisions, and practices in education. Drawing on studies across school contexts, she describes three broad forms of partnership.
Key ideas
Students can work with teachers to examine classroom practice, participate as researchers through youth-led or collaborative inquiry, and author or co-author accounts of teaching and learning. These roles position students alongside credentialed educators as critics and creators without removing educators’ professional responsibilities. Productive approaches require adults to share power, recognise students’ experience as expertise, and create channels through which insights lead to action. The article offers implications for teachers, principals, teacher educators, and researchers, including building regular feedback structures, involving students in professional learning, supporting student-led investigation, and widening opportunities to publish or present findings.
Why it matters
Voice becomes agency when participation is consequential, reciprocal, inclusive, and connected to educational change.
-
- Vol 3 RE: Chapters 13, 15, 16
democratic culturecivic competencesvaluesattitudesskillscritical understandingcompetence descriptorswhole-school developmentBook Evidence summaryAt a glance
The Reference Framework of Competences for Democratic Culture provides a systematic basis for helping learners participate effectively in democracy and live peacefully in culturally diverse societies.
Key ideas
Its model organises twenty competences into four groups: values; attitudes; skills; and knowledge and critical understanding. The three volumes explain the conceptual model, provide validated descriptors at basic, intermediate, and advanced proficiency levels, and offer guidance for curriculum, pedagogy, assessment, teacher education, whole-school development, and resilience to violent extremism. The Framework emphasises that competence is mobilised through the interaction of several elements in context, not demonstrated by isolated knowledge or a fixed checklist. It also recognises that educational institutions and democratic structures shape whether learners can act on these capacities.
Why it matters
Educators can use the descriptors to clarify learning intentions, observe development, design experiences, and support reflection, while adapting implementation to local contexts rather than treating the model as a prescribed curriculum.
-
- Vol 2 RE: Chapter 10
action-oriented language learningmediationplurilingual competencepluricultural competenceonline interactionphonological controldescriptor scalesBook Evidence summaryAt a glance
The CEFR Companion Volume updates and extends the Common European Framework of Reference for Languages while retaining the 2001 framework’s core principles.
Key ideas
It presents all illustrative descriptors in a more accessible form, replaces the native-speaker ideal with an action-oriented view of learners as social agents, and expands treatment of mediation, online interaction, plurilingual and pluricultural competence, sign language, and phonological control. Revised scales refine earlier descriptions, including the lower pre-A1 level and enriched descriptors at advanced levels. The volume treats language learning as purposeful communication in which learners draw flexibly on their entire linguistic and cultural repertoire. Teachers, curriculum designers, and assessors can use the descriptor scales to align goals, activities, feedback, and assessment, but the descriptors are illustrative rather than a mandated syllabus.
Why it matters
The publication encourages local adaptation, transparent progression, inclusive practice, and coherent links among learning, teaching, and assessment across languages and educational contexts.
-
- Vol 1 TE: App A
working memory capacitychunkingattention limitslong-term memoryinterferencerehearsalindividual differencesBook Evidence summaryAt a glance
Cowan’s book examines why working memory—the small amount of information kept readily accessible for current thought—has a sharply limited capacity.
Key ideas
It distinguishes this limit from long-term memory, sensory persistence, rehearsal, and strategies such as grouping items into meaningful chunks. Across behavioural evidence and competing theories, Cowan argues that a central focus of attention typically holds about three to four independent chunks in young adults. Apparent variation in span can arise because tasks differ in chunking, prior knowledge, interference, rehearsal opportunities, and measurement methods. The book compares item-limit, time-based, interference, attentional, biological, and evolutionary explanations and considers how capacity relates to comprehension, reasoning, learning, development, and individual differences.
Why it matters
Its practical lesson is not a simplistic rule about presenting exactly four items; instruction should reduce unnecessary simultaneous demands, connect new material with established knowledge, allow consolidation and retrieval, and recognise that meaningful organisation changes what counts as a chunk.
View or buy the cited work >>Read a similar article free online >>
-
- Vol 1 RE: Chapters 2, 4, App A, App B
short-term memory capacityworking memory chunksrehearsalsensory persistenceoutput interferencelong-term memorycapacity variabilityJournal article Evidence summaryAt a glance
Cowan reconsiders Miller’s famous seven-item estimate and argues that the capacity of a central short-term store is closer to four chunks in adults.
Key ideas
The review separates this core limit from processes that can inflate or depress observed span, including rehearsal, grouping, long-term-memory knowledge, sensory persistence, and output interference. Evidence is drawn from several paradigms—brief visual arrays, running spans, unattended speech, recall of unrelated materials, and tasks designed to restrict recoding. Converging estimates often fall near three to five meaningful units when auxiliary strategies are controlled. Cowan treats the proposal as a useful empirical generalisation rather than an invariant ceiling: capacity varies across people, ages, materials, and conditions, and defining a chunk is itself difficult.
Why it matters
For education, the paper cautions against literal “four-item” prescriptions while supporting designs that manage simultaneous information, build schemas that permit chunking, minimise irrelevant load, and give learners opportunities to rehearse, retrieve, and integrate new elements.
-
- Vol 4 RE: Chapter 3
- Vol 4 TE: App C
- Vol 7 PE: App D
working memory limitsmeaningful chunkingconcurrent processingneural interferenceschema developmentattention guidancepractice sequencingJournal article Evidence summaryAt a glance
Cowan reviews the proposal that working memory contains a central store limited to roughly three to five meaningful items in young adults.
Key ideas
This relatively stable limit must be distinguished from performance on immediate-memory tasks, which can be altered by rehearsal, chunking, sensory memory, long-term knowledge, and the amount of concurrent processing. The article explains how researchers isolate the central limit, why estimates differ among individuals and across development, and several possible reasons a limit exists, including neural representation, interference, and the need to bind elements without confusion. Capacity matters because complex cognition requires information to remain available while it is combined, compared, or transformed. Educationally, the account supports reducing avoidable concurrent demands and helping learners organise knowledge, but it does not imply that every lesson should contain only four facts.
Why it matters
Meaningful chunks depend on expertise, and well-designed instruction expands effective performance by building schemas, guiding attention, and sequencing practice.
View or buy the cited work >>Read a similar article free online >>
-
- Vol 1 RE: Chapter 9
- Vol 2 RE: Chapter 3, App A
levels of processingsemantic encodingmemory tracesmaintenance rehearsalelaborative processingretrieval conditionsencoding specificityJournal article Evidence summaryAt a glance
Craik and Lockhart propose levels of processing as an alternative to explaining memory through separate short-term and long-term stores.
Key ideas
Memory traces are viewed as by-products of perceptual and cognitive analysis: shallow processing attends to physical or sensory features, while deeper processing engages pattern recognition, meaning, and semantic relationships. Deeper, more elaborate analysis generally produces more durable retention, whereas simple maintenance rehearsal may sustain information briefly without creating strong long-term memory. The framework shifts attention from where information is stored to what operations are performed during encoding and how those operations relate to later retrieval. The authors present the proposal as a framework for research, not a completed stage theory, and recognise that depth requires operational clarification.
Why it matters
For teaching, the work supports tasks that require explanation, comparison, connection, and meaningful use rather than mere exposure or repetition, while later research cautions that memory also depends on retrieval conditions and the match between encoding and test demands.
-
- Vol 4 RE: Chapter 23, App C
child participationchild activismcrisis responsedigital inequalitypsychosocial wellbeingprotection risksmeaningful participationReport Evidence summaryAt a glance
Cuevas-Parra and Stephano report children’s and young people’s perspectives during the first months of the COVID-19 pandemic and document their continuing efforts to support families and communities.
Key ideas
Working across multiple countries under lockdown conditions, the study involved young people in gathering and interpreting accounts from peers. Participants described fear, uncertainty, disrupted schooling, isolation, unequal digital access, economic pressure, and risks to protection and wellbeing. At the same time, they organised information campaigns, peer support, hygiene activities, advocacy, and practical help. The report challenges portrayals of children only as vulnerable recipients of adult protection: many were knowledgeable actors with ideas and capacities relevant to crisis response.
Why it matters
It recommends safe, inclusive participation mechanisms; accessible and trustworthy information; attention to children excluded by technology or circumstance; psychosocial and protection support; and meaningful opportunities for young people’s views to influence decisions rather than being collected symbolically.
-
- Vol 7 RE: Chapters 11, 14
hybrid intelligencelearning analyticseducational artificial intelligencecognitive augmentationhuman agencyai literacyhuman–ai collaborationJournal article Evidence summaryAt a glance
Cukurova challenges the narrow view of educational AI as a collection of tools, especially generative systems that externalize human cognitive work. He reconnects artificial intelligence, learning analytics, and learning science through a human-centred framework with three possibilities: AI can externalize cognition by performing tasks, shape cognition as people internalize its models and outputs, or extend cognition through tightly coupled human–AI systems.
Key ideas
The last possibility supports hybrid intelligence, in which complementary human and machine capabilities produce outcomes neither could achieve alone. AI and analytics can also make learning processes visible and provide material for scientific inquiry, feedback, awareness, and regulation. Yet prediction alone does not explain learning, and indiscriminate delegation may weaken important human competencies. The article therefore asks researchers and educators to examine which cognitive work should remain human, how agency and meaning-making are preserved, and how systems affect competence over time.
Why it matters
It calls for broader AI literacy, educational-system innovation, and research that evaluates augmentation, ethics, and human development rather than merely tool performance.
A transparent research trail
More than a bibliography.
What it contributes
Evidence summaries explain the central idea and why the source matters to educators.
How to access it
Entries link to lawful full text where available, or to a publisher, library or purchase page.
Edition abbreviations
- TE
- Teacher Edition
- PE
- Practice Edition
- RE
- Research Edition
Citation checks
References are checked against publisher records, scholarly indexes, DOI or ISBN metadata, repositories and author records where available. An entry marked [Citation not verified] preserves the wording found in the relevant volume without attributing findings to an unconfirmed work.
From sources to a coherent pathway