Where it is used
Each entry identifies the volume, edition, chapter or appendix in which the work appears.
The evidence behind the series
Follow the research.
Explore every source.
Browse the scientific research and professional literature used across all seven volumes of The Science of Learning for Educators.
7book volumes
8author ranges
1searchable library
Search the collection
Find a paper, author or idea.
Choose an author range, search a title or concept, or narrow the collection by source type. Open any result to see where it appears in the books, read its evidence summary and follow available source links.
4 references
-
- Vol 6 RE: Chapters 4, 5, App A, App D, App E
collective teacher efficacycollective responsibilityinstructional collaborationmastery experiencesevidence useprofessional dialogueshared goalsJournal article Evidence summaryAt a glance
Donohoo, Hattie, and Eells explain collective teacher efficacy as educators’ shared belief that, through coordinated action, they can positively affect student learning. The construct is associated with achievement, but the article treats efficacy as more than optimism or morale.
Key ideas
Strong-efficacy cultures attribute results partly to collective practice, examine evidence, maintain high expectations, and solve problems together rather than locating failure solely in students or families. Leaders can influence these beliefs by creating opportunities for teachers to experience and recognise collective success, use evidence to connect actions with outcomes, establish achievable yet challenging goals, and build trust for honest professional dialogue. Narratives of helplessness can be reset when teams identify what lies within their influence and test responses collaboratively. The authors caution implicitly against declaring efficacy into existence: belief becomes credible through mastery experiences and evidence.
Why it matters
The practical focus is on developing shared responsibility and disciplined inquiry, not promoting confidence detached from instructional knowledge, resources, or conditions.
-
- Vol 6 PE: App E
- Vol 6 RE: Chapter 6
professional learning communitiescollective responsibilitycommon formative assessmentstudent learning evidencesystematic interventioncollaborative teamscontinuous improvementJournal article Evidence summaryAt a glance
DuFour clarifies professional learning communities by identifying three organising ideas. First, schools shift from a focus on teaching to a commitment that every student actually learns, using timely evidence and systematic intervention when learning has not occurred.
Key ideas
Second, educators work in genuine collaborative teams that examine curriculum, assessment, evidence, and classroom practice rather than merely sharing materials, handling logistics, or maintaining congenial relationships. Third, teams focus on results, establish common goals and assessments, study evidence, and use findings for continuous improvement. The article illustrates these principles through a school’s recurring inquiry into essential outcomes, indicators of learning, responses for students needing support, and extensions for those already proficient. A PLC is therefore not any meeting, committee, or supportive culture, and adopting the label does not change practice.
Why it matters
Implementation demands structural time, collective responsibility, disciplined questions, persistence, and willingness to make evidence about student learning consequential for adult action.
-
- Vol 4 RE: Chapter 23, App C
professional learning communitiescollective responsibilitycommon formative assessmentsintervention systemsteam normsdistributed leadershipinquiry-action cyclesinstructional improvementBook Evidence summaryAt a glance
DuFour, DuFour, Eaker, and Many provide an implementation handbook for professional learning communities organised around learning, collaboration, and results. Teams clarify the essential knowledge and skills all students should acquire, develop common formative assessments, analyse evidence together, and create timely, directive, systematic responses for learners needing additional support or extension.
Key ideas
The authors emphasise collective responsibility: collaboration must focus on questions of curriculum, evidence, instructional response, and improvement rather than administration or voluntary sharing. The book includes protocols, templates, examples, frequently asked questions, and tools for developing shared mission, vision, values, goals, team norms, and intervention systems. Leadership is distributed but not passive; leaders protect time, establish coherent priorities, develop team capacity, and monitor whether practices affect learning. The approach cautions against “PLC-lite,” in which schools adopt vocabulary without changing routines.
Why it matters
Progress comes from repeated cycles of inquiry and action, not from waiting for universal agreement before beginning.
View or buy the cited work >>Read a similar article free online >>
-
- Vol 6 RE: Chapters 1, 2, 5, 9, 10, 11, 14, App D
whole-system improvementsocial intelligencemachine intelligenceeducational equitysystemnesscollective responsibilitywellbeingshared accountabilityReport Evidence summaryAt a glance
Fullan proposes four mutually reinforcing “right drivers” for whole-system educational improvement, each contrasted with a dominant but inadequate alternative. Wellbeing and learning should be pursued together rather than subordinating broad development to an academic obsession.
Key ideas
Social intelligence—people learning and acting collectively—should complement and guide machine intelligence. Equality investments should replace austerity and unequal access to capability-building resources. Systemness, in which participants identify with and improve the whole, should counter fragmentation and isolated competition. The drivers are not separate initiatives or a checklist; their value lies in reciprocal interaction and coordinated action across schools, communities, and policy levels. Fullan argues that accountability, technology, and academic goals are not rejected, but become productive when positioned within relationships, equity, learning, and shared responsibility.
Why it matters
Written amid COVID-19 disruption, the report frames crisis as an opening for transformation while acknowledging that implementation requires sustained capacity, local participation, and learning. It offers a strategic argument rather than controlled evidence that the complete framework causes system success.
A transparent research trail
More than a bibliography.
What it contributes
Evidence summaries explain the central idea and why the source matters to educators.
How to access it
Entries link to lawful full text where available, or to a publisher, library or purchase page.
Edition abbreviations
- TE
- Teacher Edition
- PE
- Practice Edition
- RE
- Research Edition
Citation checks
References are checked against publisher records, scholarly indexes, DOI or ISBN metadata, repositories and author records where available. An entry marked [Citation not verified] preserves the wording found in the relevant volume without attributing findings to an unconfirmed work.
From sources to a coherent pathway