Where it is used
Each entry identifies the volume, edition, chapter or appendix in which the work appears.
The evidence behind the series
Follow the research.
Explore every source.
Browse the scientific research and professional literature used across all seven volumes of The Science of Learning for Educators.
7book volumes
8author ranges
1searchable library
Search the collection
Find a paper, author or idea.
Choose an author range, search a title or concept, or narrow the collection by source type. Open any result to see where it appears in the books, read its evidence summary and follow available source links.
4 references
-
- Vol 4 RE: Chapters 7, 8, 9, 10, 22, App A, App B
- Vol 4 TE: App C
deliberate practiceexpert performancespecialised mental representationsperformance feedbackstructured trainingskill refinementBook chapter Evidence summaryAt a glance
Ericsson reviews evidence that superior performance develops through prolonged engagement in deliberate practice rather than experience, repetition, or innate talent alone. Deliberate practice consists of demanding tasks selected to improve specific aspects of performance, clear goals, informative feedback, opportunities for correction, and repeated refinement just beyond current competence.
Key ideas
It is effortful and is typically supported by teachers, coaches, representations of expert performance, and access to structured training environments. Experts develop specialised mental representations that help them notice relevant patterns, plan, monitor, and adapt their actions. Mere years in a domain do not guarantee improvement because routine performance can become automated without continuing to target weaknesses. The chapter surveys developmental histories and laboratory evidence across domains while recognising constraints from motivation, resources, opportunity, health, and the structure of each field.
Why it matters
Educationally, the argument supports carefully sequenced practice with feedback and reflection, not mechanical drill or the claim that a single hour threshold guarantees expertise.
-
- Vol 2 RE: App D
expert performanceexpertise developmentdeliberate practicemental representationsdomain knowledgeprofessional judgementEdited book Evidence summaryAt a glance
This multidisciplinary handbook surveys what expertise is, how it develops, how it can be studied, and how expert performance differs across domains. Contributors examine methods for identifying reproducibly superior performance, cognitive and neural mechanisms, knowledge organisation, perception, memory, decision making, deliberate practice, ageing, creativity, and professional judgement.
Key ideas
Cases range across chess, music, sport, medicine, aviation, science, mathematics, writing, and other fields, revealing both common principles and domain-specific constraints. A recurring methodological lesson is that reputation or years of experience should not be equated automatically with objectively measured expertise. Experts’ advantages often depend on specialised mental representations, meaningful patterns, feedback-rich practice, and task environments that permit valid learning. The volume also addresses individual differences and contextual opportunities without reducing expertise to either talent or training alone.
Why it matters
For educators, it supports decomposing complex performance, studying authentic expert tasks, designing progressive practice and feedback, and cultivating organised domain knowledge while avoiding simplistic transfer of findings from one field to another.
View or buy the cited work >>Read a similar article free online >>
-
- Vol 1 RE: Chapter 6
long-term working memoryskilled memoryretrieval cuesdomain-specific knowledgeexpert performancemeaningful encodingJournal article Evidence summaryAt a glance
Ericsson and Kintsch propose long-term working memory to explain how skilled people handle information demands that exceed the limited temporary capacity of conventional working memory. With extensive domain knowledge and practice, performers encode task information into long-term memory while maintaining retrieval cues in short-term memory.
Key ideas
These cues permit rapid, reliable access to relevant stored information during an ongoing activity. The framework extends skilled-memory theory and is applied to text comprehension and expert performance in domains including mental calculation, chess, and medical diagnosis. Long-term working memory is domain-specific: it depends on acquired knowledge, familiar task structures, meaningful encoding, and retrieval organisations rather than a general expansion of short-term capacity. Access can be disrupted when task conditions prevent use of established cues.
Why it matters
The theory helps explain how experts maintain coherence across complex material and resume interrupted reasoning. Educationally, it suggests that fluent performance grows from organised knowledge and practised retrieval structures, not from training a context-free memory capacity in isolation.
View or buy the cited work >>Read a similar article free online >>
-
- Vol 1 RE: Chapter 6
deliberate practiceexpert performanceperformance feedbackerror correctionpractice organisationindividual differencesJournal article Evidence summaryAt a glance
Ericsson, Krampe, and Tesch-Römer argue that high-level performance is largely explained by the accumulated effects of deliberate practice: structured activities specifically designed to improve performance, requiring concentration, feedback, error correction, and repeated refinement. Studies of violinists and pianists relate attained performance to retrospective estimates of solitary practice and examine how training is constrained by effort, motivation, and recovery.
Key ideas
The authors distinguish deliberate practice from play, paid work, and mere repetition, and propose that continued improvement requires tasks beyond current reliable performance. They also review evidence across domains and challenge accounts that treat exceptional performance as a direct consequence of fixed innate capacity. The paper does not establish a universal ten-thousand-hour rule, nor does it show that practice alone explains every individual difference. Its retrospective and correlational evidence requires cautious causal interpretation.
Why it matters
Its enduring contribution is a testable framework linking expert achievement to the content, quality, duration, feedback, and developmental organisation of practice rather than to experience counted only in years.
A transparent research trail
More than a bibliography.
What it contributes
Evidence summaries explain the central idea and why the source matters to educators.
How to access it
Entries link to lawful full text where available, or to a publisher, library or purchase page.
Edition abbreviations
- TE
- Teacher Edition
- PE
- Practice Edition
- RE
- Research Edition
Citation checks
References are checked against publisher records, scholarly indexes, DOI or ISBN metadata, repositories and author records where available. An entry marked [Citation not verified] preserves the wording found in the relevant volume without attributing findings to an unconfirmed work.
From sources to a coherent pathway