Where it is used
Each entry identifies the volume, edition, chapter or appendix in which the work appears.
The evidence behind the series
Follow the research.
Explore every source.
Browse the scientific research and professional literature used across all seven volumes of The Science of Learning for Educators.
7book volumes
8author ranges
1searchable library
Search the collection
Find a paper, author or idea.
Choose an author range, search a title or concept, or narrow the collection by source type. Open any result to see where it appears in the books, read its evidence summary and follow available source links.
7 references
-
- Vol 1 RE: Chapter 13
- Vol 6 PE: App E
- Vol 6 RE: Chapters 6, 7, 8
content-focused professional developmentactive teacher learningcollaborative inquiryinstructional coachingpractice-based feedbacksustained professional learningReport Evidence summaryAt a glance
Darling-Hammond, Hyler, and Gardner review thirty-five rigorous studies linking teacher professional development with changes in instruction and student outcomes. Across diverse programmes, they identify seven recurring features: a strong focus on curriculum content; active learning rather than passive reception; collaboration situated in teachers’ contexts; models and demonstrations of effective practice; coaching or expert support; opportunities for feedback and reflection; and sustained duration.
Key ideas
The report stresses that these elements work in combination and must fit curriculum, assessment, leadership, schedules, and local needs. One-off workshops rarely provide enough time to examine practice, try new approaches, analyse student work, and revise instruction. Effective systems also develop facilitators and protect collaborative time. The synthesis does not claim that any checklist guarantees impact; programme quality, implementation, context, and access matter.
Why it matters
It offers policymakers and leaders an evidence-informed framework for designing, selecting, funding, and evaluating professional learning that supports both teacher growth and ambitious student learning.
-
- Vol 4 RE: Chapter 13
intrinsic motivationself-determinationautonomy supportcompetence supportinformational feedbackperceived controlinternalised regulationBook Evidence summaryAt a glance
Deci and Ryan develop a theory of intrinsic motivation and self-determination that challenges accounts based only on reinforcement or drive reduction. People naturally seek competence and autonomy, but social conditions can support or undermine this tendency.
Key ideas
Events such as rewards, deadlines, surveillance, feedback, and choice affect motivation partly through how they alter perceived control and competence. The book reviews cognitive evaluation theory, organismic perspectives, attribution and information-processing accounts, and research on internalising extrinsic regulation. It then considers applications in education, psychotherapy, work, and sport. The authors distinguish acting with a sense of volition from behaviour experienced as pressured, even when both pursue the same outcome.
Why it matters
For education, the framework supports optimal challenge, informative rather than controlling feedback, meaningful rationales, opportunities for initiative, and relationships that make exploration safe. It also cautions that tangible rewards or competition can weaken intrinsic engagement when learners experience them as controlling rather than competence-supportive.
View or buy the cited work >>Read a similar article free online >>
-
- Vol 2 RE: Chapter 12, App D
- Vol 2 TE: App B
- Vol 4 RE: Chapters 5, 9
- Vol 5 RE: Chapters 5, 6, 8, 11, 14
- Vol 5 TE: App C
growth mindsetfixed mindsetprocess-focused feedbacklearning goalspersistence after setbacksimplicit theories of abilityachievement motivationBook Evidence summaryAt a glance
Dweck contrasts fixed and growth mindsets: beliefs that abilities are largely static versus qualities that can be developed through learning, strategy, support, and sustained effort. These beliefs shape goals, interpretations of difficulty, responses to feedback, and willingness to persist.
Key ideas
A fixed mindset can make performance a referendum on identity, encouraging avoidance, defensiveness, or helplessness after setbacks. A growth mindset directs attention toward learning processes and possible improvement. Drawing on studies and cases from education, sport, relationships, parenting, and organisations, the book argues that adults influence mindsets through praise, evaluation, modelling, and the opportunities they provide. Praising intelligence or effortless success may communicate fragility, while process-focused feedback can support adaptive action.
Why it matters
Growth mindset does not mean that anyone can achieve anything, that effort alone is sufficient, or that structural conditions disappear. Effective application combines high expectations with honest feedback, useful strategies, teaching, resources, and opportunities to revise and improve.
View or buy the cited work >>Read a similar article free online >>
-
- Vol 2 RE: Chapter 11
- Vol 5 RE: Chapters 1, 2, 4, App B
assessment as learningformative assessmentsummative assessmentfeedback loopsstudent self-regulationassessment criteriametacognitive developmentBook Evidence summaryAt a glance
Earl distinguishes assessment of learning, assessment for learning, and assessment as learning. Summative assessment certifies achievement; formative assessment supplies evidence teachers use to adapt instruction; assessment as learning places students at the centre as active monitors and regulators of their own learning.
Key ideas
Learners develop criteria, interpret feedback, compare current work with desired quality, identify misconceptions, and decide what to do next. The second edition connects these purposes with contemporary accounts of complex learning and illustrates classroom dilemmas, rubrics, lessons, and implementation across contexts. Assessment as learning does not mean leaving students to judge themselves without standards or teaching. Teachers deliberately model metacognition, make quality visible, design informative tasks, question thinking, and create safe opportunities for revision.
Why it matters
Grades alone provide too little guidance and can displace attention from learning. A balanced system uses each assessment purpose intentionally, with particular investment in feedback loops that build learners’ capacity to understand evidence and exercise informed agency.
View or buy the cited work >>Read a similar article free online >>
-
- Vol 4 RE: Chapters 7, 8, 9, 10, 22, App A, App B
- Vol 4 TE: App C
deliberate practiceexpert performancespecialised mental representationsperformance feedbackstructured trainingskill refinementBook chapter Evidence summaryAt a glance
Ericsson reviews evidence that superior performance develops through prolonged engagement in deliberate practice rather than experience, repetition, or innate talent alone. Deliberate practice consists of demanding tasks selected to improve specific aspects of performance, clear goals, informative feedback, opportunities for correction, and repeated refinement just beyond current competence.
Key ideas
It is effortful and is typically supported by teachers, coaches, representations of expert performance, and access to structured training environments. Experts develop specialised mental representations that help them notice relevant patterns, plan, monitor, and adapt their actions. Mere years in a domain do not guarantee improvement because routine performance can become automated without continuing to target weaknesses. The chapter surveys developmental histories and laboratory evidence across domains while recognising constraints from motivation, resources, opportunity, health, and the structure of each field.
Why it matters
Educationally, the argument supports carefully sequenced practice with feedback and reflection, not mechanical drill or the claim that a single hour threshold guarantees expertise.
-
- Vol 1 RE: Chapter 6
deliberate practiceexpert performanceperformance feedbackerror correctionpractice organisationindividual differencesJournal article Evidence summaryAt a glance
Ericsson, Krampe, and Tesch-Römer argue that high-level performance is largely explained by the accumulated effects of deliberate practice: structured activities specifically designed to improve performance, requiring concentration, feedback, error correction, and repeated refinement. Studies of violinists and pianists relate attained performance to retrospective estimates of solitary practice and examine how training is constrained by effort, motivation, and recovery.
Key ideas
The authors distinguish deliberate practice from play, paid work, and mere repetition, and propose that continued improvement requires tasks beyond current reliable performance. They also review evidence across domains and challenge accounts that treat exceptional performance as a direct consequence of fixed innate capacity. The paper does not establish a universal ten-thousand-hour rule, nor does it show that practice alone explains every individual difference. Its retrospective and correlational evidence requires cautious causal interpretation.
Why it matters
Its enduring contribution is a testable framework linking expert achievement to the content, quality, duration, feedback, and developmental organisation of practice rather than to experience counted only in years.
-
- Vol 2 RE: App C, App D
inquiry-based science teachingteacher guidanceepistemic activitiesinstructional scaffoldingdisciplinary practicesevidence-based reasoningfeedbackguided inquiryJournal article Evidence summaryAt a glance
Furtak and colleagues meta-analyse experimental and quasi-experimental studies of inquiry-based science teaching to estimate effects and examine how instructional guidance matters. Across 37 studies yielding 42 independent effect sizes, inquiry instruction had a positive overall effect on student learning.
Key ideas
Effects varied by the kind of cognitive activity emphasised and by the degree of teacher guidance. Approaches involving epistemic activities—using evidence and reasoning to develop or justify knowledge—showed particularly strong results, while teacher-led guidance within inquiry was more effective than interpretations that left students to discover procedures and concepts with little support. The review therefore challenges the false choice between direct teaching and unguided inquiry. Productive inquiry involves carefully designed questions, disciplinary practices, scaffolding, feedback, and explicit support calibrated to learners and goals.
Why it matters
The authors also note variation in study quality, outcome measures, samples, and definitions of inquiry. Educational decisions should focus on which inquiry processes are taught and supported, not whether an activity merely carries the inquiry label.
A transparent research trail
More than a bibliography.
What it contributes
Evidence summaries explain the central idea and why the source matters to educators.
How to access it
Entries link to lawful full text where available, or to a publisher, library or purchase page.
Edition abbreviations
- TE
- Teacher Edition
- PE
- Practice Edition
- RE
- Research Edition
Citation checks
References are checked against publisher records, scholarly indexes, DOI or ISBN metadata, repositories and author records where available. An entry marked [Citation not verified] preserves the wording found in the relevant volume without attributing findings to an unconfirmed work.
From sources to a coherent pathway