Where it is used
Each entry identifies the volume, edition, chapter or appendix in which the work appears.
The evidence behind the series
Follow the research.
Explore every source.
Browse the scientific research and professional literature used across all seven volumes of The Science of Learning for Educators.
7book volumes
8author ranges
1searchable library
Search the collection
Find a paper, author or idea.
Choose an author range, search a title or concept, or narrow the collection by source type. Open any result to see where it appears in the books, read its evidence summary and follow available source links.
61 references
-
- Vol 6 PE: App E
- Vol 6 RE: Chapter 8
- Vol 6 RE: Chapter 8, App D, App E
lesson studyprofessional learningresearch lessonspupil observationteaching-learning relationshipscollective inquiryevidence-rich practiceinstructional revisionEdited book Evidence summaryAt a glance
Dudley’s edited volume explains lesson study as a sustained form of professional learning in which teachers jointly identify a learning challenge, study relevant knowledge, plan a research lesson, observe selected pupils closely, analyse evidence, revise the lesson, and share what they learn.
Key ideas
Chapters connect the practice’s Japanese development with adaptations in the United Kingdom and other systems, review research, and examine leadership, curriculum development, initial teacher education, and support for pupils with specific needs. The focus is not on rating the teacher delivering the lesson but on making normally invisible relationships among teaching, pupil thinking, and learning available for collective inquiry. Case pupils, interviews, and detailed observation can challenge assumptions that ordinary classroom monitoring leaves intact. Effective implementation requires time, trust, knowledgeable facilitation, access to expertise, and ways to retain and circulate findings.
Why it matters
Lesson study is presented as disciplined, evidence-rich practice development, not simply collaborative lesson planning or a one-off demonstration lesson.
View or buy the cited work >>Read a similar article free online >>
-
- Vol 6 PE: App E
- Vol 6 RE: Chapter 6
professional learning communitiescollective responsibilitycommon formative assessmentstudent learning evidencesystematic interventioncollaborative teamscontinuous improvementJournal article Evidence summaryAt a glance
DuFour clarifies professional learning communities by identifying three organising ideas. First, schools shift from a focus on teaching to a commitment that every student actually learns, using timely evidence and systematic intervention when learning has not occurred.
Key ideas
Second, educators work in genuine collaborative teams that examine curriculum, assessment, evidence, and classroom practice rather than merely sharing materials, handling logistics, or maintaining congenial relationships. Third, teams focus on results, establish common goals and assessments, study evidence, and use findings for continuous improvement. The article illustrates these principles through a school’s recurring inquiry into essential outcomes, indicators of learning, responses for students needing support, and extensions for those already proficient. A PLC is therefore not any meeting, committee, or supportive culture, and adopting the label does not change practice.
Why it matters
Implementation demands structural time, collective responsibility, disciplined questions, persistence, and willingness to make evidence about student learning consequential for adult action.
-
- Vol 4 RE: Chapter 23, App C
professional learning communitiescollective responsibilitycommon formative assessmentsintervention systemsteam normsdistributed leadershipinquiry-action cyclesinstructional improvementBook Evidence summaryAt a glance
DuFour, DuFour, Eaker, and Many provide an implementation handbook for professional learning communities organised around learning, collaboration, and results. Teams clarify the essential knowledge and skills all students should acquire, develop common formative assessments, analyse evidence together, and create timely, directive, systematic responses for learners needing additional support or extension.
Key ideas
The authors emphasise collective responsibility: collaboration must focus on questions of curriculum, evidence, instructional response, and improvement rather than administration or voluntary sharing. The book includes protocols, templates, examples, frequently asked questions, and tools for developing shared mission, vision, values, goals, team norms, and intervention systems. Leadership is distributed but not passive; leaders protect time, establish coherent priorities, develop team capacity, and monitor whether practices affect learning. The approach cautions against “PLC-lite,” in which schools adopt vocabulary without changing routines.
Why it matters
Progress comes from repeated cycles of inquiry and action, not from waiting for universal agreement before beginning.
View or buy the cited work >>Read a similar article free online >>
-
- Vol 2 RE: App D
- Vol 4 RE: Chapters 1, 2, 4, 8, 17, App C
- Vol 4 TE: App C
- Vol 7 PE: App D
metacognitionjudgments of learningfeelings of knowingconfidence calibrationsource monitoringretrieval monitoringcognitive controlBook Evidence summaryAt a glance
Dunlosky and Metcalfe survey metacognition: people’s knowledge, monitoring, and control of their own cognitive processes. The book explains major judgements—including feelings of knowing, judgements of learning, confidence, source judgements, and tip-of-the-tongue experiences—and the experimental methods used to measure their accuracy.
Key ideas
Monitoring matters because learners use subjective assessments to decide what to study, when to stop, what to retrieve, and whether an answer is reliable, yet confidence can be systematically biased by fluency, familiarity, delay, cues, and task conditions. Chapters connect theory with education, eyewitness evidence, childhood, and ageing. Effective control requires not simply reflecting more but basing judgements on diagnostic evidence and selecting actions that improve later performance. Educational implications include delaying self-assessment when appropriate, using retrieval to reveal learning, comparing predictions with outcomes, and teaching learners how cues can mislead.
Why it matters
The text treats metacognition as multiple interacting processes rather than a single general skill or accurate inner observer.
View or buy the cited work >>Read a similar article free online >>
-
- Vol 1 RE: Chapters 1, 3, 7, 9, App A
- Vol 2 RE: Chapter 3, App C
- Vol 2 TE: App B
- Vol 4 RE: Chapters 1, 2, 4, 7, 20
- Vol 4 TE: App C
- Vol 7 PE: App D
practice testingdistributed practiceinterleaved practiceelaborative interrogationself-explanationretrieval practicelearning technique efficacyJournal article Evidence summaryAt a glance
Dunlosky and colleagues review ten commonly used learning techniques and rate their utility across learner characteristics, materials, tasks, retention intervals, and educational contexts. Practice testing and distributed practice receive high-utility ratings because their benefits are comparatively robust and broadly applicable.
Key ideas
Elaborative interrogation, self-explanation, and interleaved practice receive moderate ratings: they are promising but depend more on prior knowledge, material, implementation, or a still-limited evidence base. Summarisation, highlighting, keyword mnemonics, imagery for text, and rereading receive low ratings as general-purpose techniques, though each may help under particular conditions or with training. The ratings reflect evidence and generalisability, not a claim that low-rated methods never work. The review emphasises durable retention and comprehension, notes substantial gaps in representative classrooms, and distinguishes familiarity during study from later learning.
Why it matters
For practice, students need explicit instruction and routines for spaced retrieval, feedback, explanatory thinking, and discriminating among problem types rather than relying mainly on passive review.
-
- Vol 2 RE: Chapter 12, App D
- Vol 2 TE: App B
- Vol 4 RE: Chapters 5, 9
- Vol 5 RE: Chapters 5, 6, 8, 11, 14
- Vol 5 TE: App C
growth mindsetfixed mindsetprocess-focused feedbacklearning goalspersistence after setbacksimplicit theories of abilityachievement motivationBook Evidence summaryAt a glance
Dweck contrasts fixed and growth mindsets: beliefs that abilities are largely static versus qualities that can be developed through learning, strategy, support, and sustained effort. These beliefs shape goals, interpretations of difficulty, responses to feedback, and willingness to persist.
Key ideas
A fixed mindset can make performance a referendum on identity, encouraging avoidance, defensiveness, or helplessness after setbacks. A growth mindset directs attention toward learning processes and possible improvement. Drawing on studies and cases from education, sport, relationships, parenting, and organisations, the book argues that adults influence mindsets through praise, evaluation, modelling, and the opportunities they provide. Praising intelligence or effortless success may communicate fragility, while process-focused feedback can support adaptive action.
Why it matters
Growth mindset does not mean that anyone can achieve anything, that effort alone is sufficient, or that structural conditions disappear. Effective application combines high expectations with honest feedback, useful strategies, teaching, resources, and opportunities to revise and improve.
View or buy the cited work >>Read a similar article free online >>
-
- Vol 2 RE: Chapter 11
- Vol 5 RE: Chapters 1, 2, 4, App B
assessment as learningformative assessmentsummative assessmentfeedback loopsstudent self-regulationassessment criteriametacognitive developmentBook Evidence summaryAt a glance
Earl distinguishes assessment of learning, assessment for learning, and assessment as learning. Summative assessment certifies achievement; formative assessment supplies evidence teachers use to adapt instruction; assessment as learning places students at the centre as active monitors and regulators of their own learning.
Key ideas
Learners develop criteria, interpret feedback, compare current work with desired quality, identify misconceptions, and decide what to do next. The second edition connects these purposes with contemporary accounts of complex learning and illustrates classroom dilemmas, rubrics, lessons, and implementation across contexts. Assessment as learning does not mean leaving students to judge themselves without standards or teaching. Teachers deliberately model metacognition, make quality visible, design informative tasks, question thinking, and create safe opportunities for revision.
Why it matters
Grades alone provide too little guidance and can displace attention from learning. A balanced system uses each assessment purpose intentionally, with particular investment in feedback loops that build learners’ capacity to understand evidence and exercise informed agency.
View or buy the cited work >>Read a similar article free online >>
-
- Vol 1 TE: App A
forgetting curvesavings methodnonsense syllablesspaced repetitionrelearningmemory retentionexperimental memory measurementBook Evidence summaryAt a glance
Ebbinghaus established an experimental programme for studying memory by learning and relearning lists of deliberately meaningless syllables under controlled conditions, largely using himself as the participant.
Key ideas
He measured retention through “savings”: how much less time or repetition was needed to relearn material after a delay than during initial learning. The resulting observations showed rapid early loss followed by slower decline, later popularised as the forgetting curve. The work also examined effects of list length, number of repetitions, time, and repeated learning, providing early evidence that spaced repetitions can be more efficient than the same practice massed together. The famous curve is not a universal timetable for every learner or kind of knowledge; it arose from particular materials, one intensively studied person, and a savings measure rather than simple percent recalled.
Why it matters
Its enduring contribution is methodological and conceptual: forgetting changes systematically with conditions, and durable learning can be investigated through controlled encoding, delay, retrieval, and relearning.
-
- Vol 1 RE: Chapters 1, 5, 8, App A
forgetting curvesavings methodnonsense syllablesdistributed practicerepetition effectsmemory retentionquantitative memory researchBook Evidence summaryAt a glance
In this foundational experimental study, Ebbinghaus investigates memory with lists of nonsense syllables constructed to reduce the influence of existing meaning and association. Serving as his own participant across extensive trials, he standardises presentation and mastery, then measures retention by the time or repetitions saved when relearning material after intervals.
Key ideas
He reports the characteristic pattern of steep initial forgetting followed by a progressively slower decline, alongside effects of repetition, list length, and the distribution of practice. Repeated learning strengthens later savings, and distributing repetitions can yield more durable results than concentrating them in one sitting. These results helped make higher mental processes accessible to quantitative experiment. The findings should not be treated as a precise universal decay schedule: the design used one participant, artificial verbal material, and a specific savings measure.
Why it matters
The broader educational implication is that memory depends on time and practice conditions, and that planned revisiting and retrieval are needed if learning is expected to endure.
-
- Vol 6 RE: App B, App D
effective schoolsinstructional leadershiphigh expectationsschool climatebasic skillsprogress monitoringeducational disadvantageJournal article Evidence summaryAt a glance
Edmonds argues against the assumption that poverty or family background makes low achievement inevitable.
Key ideas
Reviewing research on urban schools, he maintains that some schools serving economically disadvantaged pupils attain substantially stronger outcomes than comparable schools, making school organisation and instruction consequential. The effective-schools formulation emphasises strong instructional leadership, a pervasive focus on basic skills, an orderly and safe climate, high expectations for all pupils, frequent monitoring of progress, and allocation of time and resources toward learning. The article helped establish an improvement movement grounded in the conviction that schools are responsible for ensuring mastery rather than merely offering instruction. Its early evidence base and correlational identification of common features do not prove that a short checklist mechanically causes effectiveness; later work has debated measures, context, equity, curriculum breadth, and implementation.
Why it matters
Its lasting challenge is moral as well as empirical: educators should investigate and change school practices rather than use social disadvantage as an explanation for accepting unequal outcomes.
-
- Vol 2 RE: Chapter 12
- Vol 3 RE: Chapters 7, 10, 12
- Vol 3 TE: App C
- Vol 5 RE: Chapter 11
- Vol 5 TE: App C
- Vol 6 PE: App E
- Vol 6 RE: Chapters 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 10, 11
psychological safetyteam learning behaviorinterpersonal risk takingerror discussionleader coachinghelp seekingteam efficacyJournal article Evidence summaryAt a glance
Edmondson introduces team psychological safety as a shared belief that a group is safe for interpersonal risk taking. In a multimethod field study of fifty-one manufacturing teams, she examines how safety, efficacy, context support, leader coaching, learning behaviour, and performance relate.
Key ideas
Psychological safety predicts behaviours such as asking for help, discussing errors, seeking feedback, experimenting, and reflecting; those learning behaviours in turn help explain performance. Team efficacy does not show the same relationship after safety is considered. Supportive structures and coaching contribute to the climate, showing that learning depends on both interpersonal belief and organisational conditions. Psychological safety is not comfort, agreement, low standards, or freedom from accountability.
Why it matters
It enables candour about uncertainty and mistakes so that demanding work can improve. For educational teams, the study supports leader inclusiveness, constructive responses to bad news, clear learning goals, and routines that make questions and dissent usable, while recognising that evidence is correlational and comes from a specific organisational setting.
-
- Vol 2 RE: Chapter 12
- Vol 6 RE: Chapters 2, 5, 6, 7, 8, 10, App D, App E
psychological safetyorganisational learningspeaking upintelligent failureleader inclusivenessworkplace innovationlearning climateBook Evidence summaryAt a glance
Edmondson argues that organisations doing uncertain, interdependent knowledge work need psychological safety: a climate in which people can ask questions, admit mistakes, offer ideas, and challenge assumptions without fear of humiliation or retaliation. Drawing on research and cases from healthcare, aviation, manufacturing, technology, and other settings, she shows how silence can conceal weak signals and prevent learning, while candour supports experimentation, innovation, and adaptation.
Key ideas
Safety is not niceness, consensus, immunity from consequences, or reduced performance standards. High-performing environments combine psychological safety with clear, demanding expectations. Leaders build such conditions by framing work as a learning problem, acknowledging their own fallibility and dependence on others, inviting participation specifically, and responding productively when people speak up. They must also distinguish intelligent failures in new territory from preventable violations.
Why it matters
The book offers diagnostic questions and practical actions, while emphasising that safety emerges from repeated interpersonal and organisational signals rather than a slogan or one-time workshop.
View or buy the cited work >>Read a similar article free online >>
-
- Vol 5 RE: Chapter 1
civil service examinationslate imperial chinaneo-confucian learningelite educationsocial mobilityexamination culturestate formationBook Evidence summaryAt a glance
Elman reconstructs the civil examination system of late imperial China using more than a thousand examination records and extensive social, political, literary, and institutional evidence from the Yuan, Ming, and Qing periods.
Key ideas
Examinations selected many officials and shaped elite education, publishing, family strategy, regional competition, cultural orthodoxy, and popular imagination. The study argues that the system established after 1370 differed substantially from earlier Tang and Song literary examinations and helped make Neo-Confucian learning authoritative in government and literati life. Although examination achievement offered a recognised route to status and created forms of geographic and social circulation, preparation required resources and networks, competition was extreme, and lineage, gender, wealth, and region structured access. The system also produced unintended cultural and political effects that outlasted its abolition in 1905.
Why it matters
Elman’s account complicates simple descriptions of examinations as either meritocratic equality or sterile memorisation by showing an evolving institution embedded in state power and social life.
-
- Vol 2 RE: Chapters 5, 13, App A, App D, App F
- Vol 3 RE: Chapters 1, 12, 15, App D
- Vol 3 TE: App C
- Vol 4 RE: App D
- Vol 5 RE: App D
- Vol 6 RE: Chapter 13, App C, App D, App E
cultural-historical activity theoryactivity systemsexpansive learningsystemic contradictionscollective agencydevelopmental transformationBook Evidence summaryAt a glance
Engeström develops expansive learning within cultural-historical activity theory to explain collective learning when the knowledge or practice needed does not yet exist. The unit of analysis is an activity system comprising subject, object, mediating tools, community, rules, and division of labour.
Key ideas
Historically accumulated contradictions within and between these elements generate disturbances but can also become sources of transformation. Expansive learning proceeds through actions such as questioning existing practice, analysing its history and tensions, modelling a new solution, examining and testing the model, implementing it, reflecting on the process, and consolidating a new form of activity. The cycle is not a neat linear sequence, and development involves struggle, negotiation, and changes in the shared object. Learning is therefore more than individuals acquiring established content; participants collaboratively create a qualitatively expanded activity.
Why it matters
For organisational and educational change, the framework supports analysing systemic contradictions and building collective agency rather than attributing recurring problems only to individual competence or motivation.
-
- Vol 6 RE: Chapter 13, App C, App D, App E
workplace learningactivity systemsexpansive learningorganisational contradictionstransformative agencycollective activityJournal article Evidence summaryAt a glance
Engeström reconceptualises workplace learning for situations in which people must create a new activity rather than acquire a stable skill already known in advance. Using cultural-historical activity theory, he represents work as a collective system linking subjects, object, tools, rules, community, and division of labour.
Key ideas
Contradictions accumulated within this system appear as disruptions, dilemmas, and competing motives; analysing them can open a zone for expansive learning. Participants question current practice, trace its historical development, model alternatives, test and implement a new form, reflect, and consolidate change. The object of activity—and the participants’ collective agency—expands through this process. Engeström uses examples of transformation at work and discusses dimensions such as social-spatial, temporal, moral-ideological, and systemic expansion.
Why it matters
The theory cautions against reducing organisational learning to individual training or information transfer. Developmental interventions instead create tools and dialogue through which practitioners can examine evidence, surface contradictions, and construct solutions whose content is not predetermined by an external expert.
-
- Vol 2 RE: App F
- Vol 5 RE: App D
expansive learningcultural-historical activity theoryactivity systemssystemic contradictionscollective agencyactivity transformationBook Evidence summaryAt a glance
This second edition presents Engeström’s theory of expansive learning, developed to explain learning in collective activity when the required knowledge or practice is not already available. Cultural-historical activity theory treats the unit of analysis as an activity system linking subject, object, tools, community, rules, and division of labour.
Key ideas
Historically accumulated contradictions within and between these elements produce disturbances and conflicts, but can also drive transformation. Expansive learning involves questioning existing practice, analysing its history and tensions, modelling a new solution, examining and testing that model, implementing it, reflecting on the process, and consolidating a changed activity. The sequence is cyclical and contested rather than a fixed recipe. The revised edition develops the framework through later research and clarifies how participants expand the shared object and build collective agency.
Why it matters
For education and organisational development, it shifts attention from transmitting predetermined answers toward collaboratively creating new, system-level forms of activity.
View or buy the cited work >>Read a similar article free online >>
-
- Vol 4 RE: App C, App D
collective transformationexpansive learningformative interventionsactivity systemscross-boundary collaborationtransformative agencyBook Evidence summaryAt a glance
Engeström brings together studies that develop expansive learning as a theory of collective transformation in work and organisations. The central problem is how people learn when they face persistent contradictions and must construct an activity that does not yet exist.
Key ideas
Cultural-historical activity theory analyses the shared object of work together with mediating tools, rules, community, and division of labour. Across intervention studies, participants surface disturbances, examine the historical formation of problems, model alternatives, test and implement new practices, and build agency to sustain them. The cases show that expansion can cross organisational and professional boundaries and that learning trajectories contain conflict, setbacks, partial advances, and competing interpretations. Formative interventions therefore do not simply deliver an expert-designed solution; they provide conceptual and representational tools through which practitioners analyse and redesign their own activity.
Why it matters
The collection connects theoretical development with empirical methods and demonstrates why workplace learning cannot be reduced to individual skill acquisition or adaptation to an unchanged system.
View or buy the cited work >>Read a similar article free online >>
-
- Vol 4 RE: App D
concept formationcomplex activity systemstheoretical conceptsdouble stimulationtransformative agencyconceptual developmentJournal article Evidence summaryAt a glance
Engeström proposes a research agenda for studying concept formation outside laboratories and formal lessons, where communities create culturally new concepts while confronting persistent practical problems. Drawing on cultural-historical activity theory and dialectical accounts of concept development, he advances five guiding ideas.
Key ideas
Concepts form within historically evolving collective activity systems; different kinds of concepts must be distinguished; theoretical concepts develop by ascending from an abstract germ cell toward a concrete system; concepts in practice are polyvalent, contested, and dynamic; and concept formation is intertwined with transformative agency generated through double stimulation. Concepts are therefore not merely static labels acquired by individuals. They can become future-oriented instruments that reorganise a shared activity, its relationships, and its possibilities for action. Research should follow concepts longitudinally across discourse, material tools, social relations, and organisational boundaries.
Why it matters
For education, the agenda connects classroom learning with wider productive activities and asks how learners participate in creating concepts capable of transforming the situations they address.
-
- Vol 4 RE: Chapters 7, 8, 9, 10, 22, App A, App B
- Vol 4 TE: App C
deliberate practiceexpert performancespecialised mental representationsperformance feedbackstructured trainingskill refinementBook chapter Evidence summaryAt a glance
Ericsson reviews evidence that superior performance develops through prolonged engagement in deliberate practice rather than experience, repetition, or innate talent alone. Deliberate practice consists of demanding tasks selected to improve specific aspects of performance, clear goals, informative feedback, opportunities for correction, and repeated refinement just beyond current competence.
Key ideas
It is effortful and is typically supported by teachers, coaches, representations of expert performance, and access to structured training environments. Experts develop specialised mental representations that help them notice relevant patterns, plan, monitor, and adapt their actions. Mere years in a domain do not guarantee improvement because routine performance can become automated without continuing to target weaknesses. The chapter surveys developmental histories and laboratory evidence across domains while recognising constraints from motivation, resources, opportunity, health, and the structure of each field.
Why it matters
Educationally, the argument supports carefully sequenced practice with feedback and reflection, not mechanical drill or the claim that a single hour threshold guarantees expertise.
-
- Vol 4 RE: Chapter 11
protocol analysisthink-aloud methodsverbal reportscognitive processesretrospective reportsprotocol codingBook Evidence summaryAt a glance
Ericsson and Simon provide a theoretical and methodological framework for using verbal reports as evidence about cognitive processes. Their information-processing account distinguishes concurrent think-aloud reports from retrospective reports and explains when verbalisation is likely to reflect information already in focal attention.
Key ideas
Asking participants simply to verbalise attended information may leave the underlying task process largely unchanged, whereas requests for explanations, reasons, or interpretations can introduce additional processing and alter performance. The book examines completeness, accuracy, memory effects, instructions, task demands, recording, transcription, segmentation, encoding, and analysis of protocols, grounding recommendations in experimental evidence. Verbal data are neither transparent access to thought nor inherently invalid introspection; their value depends on a model of how reports are generated and on procedures aligned with the research question. Researchers should combine protocols with behavioural evidence, avoid treating silence as absence of cognition, and report elicitation and coding decisions clearly.
Why it matters
The revised edition established think-aloud methods as a rigorous tool across cognitive research and applied studies.
View or buy the cited work >>Read a similar article free online >>
A transparent research trail
More than a bibliography.
What it contributes
Evidence summaries explain the central idea and why the source matters to educators.
How to access it
Entries link to lawful full text where available, or to a publisher, library or purchase page.
Edition abbreviations
- TE
- Teacher Edition
- PE
- Practice Edition
- RE
- Research Edition
Citation checks
References are checked against publisher records, scholarly indexes, DOI or ISBN metadata, repositories and author records where available. An entry marked [Citation not verified] preserves the wording found in the relevant volume without attributing findings to an unconfirmed work.
From sources to a coherent pathway