Where it is used
Each entry identifies the volume, edition, chapter or appendix in which the work appears.
The evidence behind the series
Browse the scientific research and professional literature used across all seven volumes of The Science of Learning for Educators.
Search the collection
Choose an author range, search a title or concept, or narrow the collection by source type. Open any result to see where it appears in the books, read its evidence summary and follow available source links.
1 reference
Harlen examines summative assessment used for reporting, certification, selection, accountability, and evaluation, and asks how methods should be judged. Four recurring criteria are validity, reliability, impact on teaching and learning, and resources required.
External tests can offer standardisation and comparability but sample limited outcomes, create measurement error, and can narrow curriculum or pedagogy when stakes are high. Teachers’ judgements draw on richer evidence gathered over time and across contexts, but require clear criteria, shared standards, moderation, and quality assurance to become dependable. Assessment methods are not inherently formative or summative; purpose and use determine their function, and classroom evidence can contribute to both. A balanced system aligns intended learning, teaching, tasks, interpretation, and reporting while making uncertainty visible.
Harlen supports greater use of moderated teacher assessment rather than treating tests as the only objective evidence. Decisions should consider consequences for learners and curriculum alongside technical properties, ensuring that efforts to increase reliability do not undermine validity by measuring a narrower version of learning.
View or buy the cited work >>Read a similar article free online >>
A transparent research trail
Each entry identifies the volume, edition, chapter or appendix in which the work appears.
Evidence summaries explain the central idea and why the source matters to educators.
Entries link to lawful full text where available, or to a publisher, library or purchase page.
References are checked against publisher records, scholarly indexes, DOI or ISBN metadata, repositories and author records where available. An entry marked [Citation not verified] preserves the wording found in the relevant volume without attributing findings to an unconfirmed work.
From sources to a coherent pathway