Where it is used
Each entry identifies the volume, edition, chapter or appendix in which the work appears.
The evidence behind the series
Follow the research.
Explore every source.
Browse the scientific research and professional literature used across all seven volumes of The Science of Learning for Educators.
7book volumes
8author ranges
1searchable library
Search the collection
Find a paper, author or idea.
Choose an author range, search a title or concept, or narrow the collection by source type. Open any result to see where it appears in the books, read its evidence summary and follow available source links.
2 references
-
- Vol 6 RE: Chapters 4, 5, 6, 10, 11, 12, App B, App D, App E
collaborative professionalismcollaborative inquirycollective efficacycollective responsibilityjoint workprofessional dialoguestudent collaborationevidence-informed practiceBook Evidence summaryAt a glance
Hargreaves and O’Connor distinguish collaborative professionalism from routine professional collaboration. Working together becomes professionally consequential when it is deliberate, evidence-informed, embedded in the organisation, and directed toward improved learning and equity rather than meetings or congeniality.
Key ideas
Drawing on five international cases, they identify ten connected tenets including collective efficacy, collaborative inquiry, collective responsibility, collaborative initiative, mutual dialogue, joint work, common meaning and purpose, collaborating with students, big-picture thinking, and attention to both formal and informal collaboration. Strong collaboration includes disagreement, disciplined inquiry, and shared responsibility; it does not require constant consensus or eliminate individual expertise. Structures such as schedules, protocols, leadership support, and access to evidence make sustained joint work possible, while trust enables candour and risk. The cases are illustrative rather than proof that one model transfers unchanged across systems.
Why it matters
Educators should examine which collaborations deepen knowledge and improve learner experience, which merely consume time, and how power, workload, student voice, cultural context, and measurable consequences shape the value of working together.
View or buy the cited work >>Read a similar article free online >>
-
- Vol 6 RE: Chapter 5
collaborative expertisecollective efficacyteacher assessmentprofessional collaborationinstructional impactevidence-informed practicestudent progressReport Evidence summaryAt a glance
Hattie’s policy report argues that education systems should shift attention from structural fixes toward collaborative professional expertise focused on the impact of teaching.
Key ideas
It proposes eight connected tasks: agree on what a year’s progress means, expect every student to make that progress, develop dependable assessment and evaluation tools, understand instructional impact, ensure teachers have expertise in diagnosis and intervention, stop practices unsupported by evidence, strengthen collaboration, and communicate the profession’s collective responsibility. Variation among teachers and schools is treated as a source of information for improvement, not merely a basis for ranking. Leaders should create conditions in which educators jointly examine student work, moderate judgements, discuss evidence, learn from high-impact practice, and intervene when progress is insufficient. The report is an advocacy and synthesis document rather than a new systematic review, so its proposals depend on the quality and interpretation of the underlying evidence.
Why it matters
Its central idea is collective efficacy: professional autonomy should be accompanied by shared standards, transparent evidence, and collaborative responsibility for every learner’s growth.
A transparent research trail
More than a bibliography.
What it contributes
Evidence summaries explain the central idea and why the source matters to educators.
How to access it
Entries link to lawful full text where available, or to a publisher, library or purchase page.
Edition abbreviations
- TE
- Teacher Edition
- PE
- Practice Edition
- RE
- Research Edition
Citation checks
References are checked against publisher records, scholarly indexes, DOI or ISBN metadata, repositories and author records where available. An entry marked [Citation not verified] preserves the wording found in the relevant volume without attributing findings to an unconfirmed work.
From sources to a coherent pathway