Where it is used
Each entry identifies the volume, edition, chapter or appendix in which the work appears.
The evidence behind the series
Follow the research.
Explore every source.
Browse the scientific research and professional literature used across all seven volumes of The Science of Learning for Educators.
7book volumes
8author ranges
1searchable library
Search the collection
Find a paper, author or idea.
Choose an author range, search a title or concept, or narrow the collection by source type. Open any result to see where it appears in the books, read its evidence summary and follow available source links.
5 references
-
- Vol 6 PE: App E
- Vol 6 RE: Chapter 5
distributed leadershipconcertive actiondistributed cognitioncollective agencydivision of labourinformal expertiseJournal article Evidence summaryAt a glance
Gronn proposes distributed leadership as an alternative unit of analysis to explanations centred on a single formal leader. An additive view counts leadership contributions made by multiple individuals, but a holistic view examines concertive action whose combined effect is more than independently aggregated behaviour.
Key ideas
Concertive patterns can arise through spontaneous collaboration, intuitive working relationships developed over time, or institutionalised practices and structures. Interdependence and coordination are therefore central: distributing tasks or appointing committees does not necessarily distribute leadership. The article connects distributed cognition, activity theory, and division of labour to leadership research and argues that analysts should study how influence is stretched across people, tools, routines, and situations. This perspective can reveal informal expertise and collective agency, but it does not imply that hierarchy, power, accountability, or individual responsibility disappear.
Why it matters
For schools and organisations, the framework supports examining actual patterns of joint work and influence rather than assuming either that the designated leader acts alone or that participation is automatically equal and democratic.
View or buy the cited work >>Read a similar article free online >>
-
- Vol 6 RE: Chapter 5
distributed leadershiphybrid leadershipleadership configurationsorganisational hierarchypower distributionleadership accountabilityJournal article Evidence summaryAt a glance
Gronn reassesses distributed leadership after the concept’s rapid theoretical and practical adoption. He argues that distributing influence is not historically new and that contemporary accounts have often neglected earlier small-group and division-of-labour scholarship.
Key ideas
The label can also obscure continuing hierarchy, power, and patterned combinations of individual and collective leadership. Rather than treating focused and distributed leadership as opposites, Gronn proposes attention to hybrid configurations in which formal leaders, informal contributors, teams, routines, and situational demands combine differently over time. Distribution is not synonymous with democracy: influence can be dispersed while authority and control remain unequal. Nor does a larger number of leadership actors guarantee coordination or effectiveness.
Why it matters
The article calls for stronger conceptual distinctions and empirical methods capable of examining actual configurations, their antecedents, and their consequences. For educational organisations, the implication is to map who influences what, through which interactions and structures, with what accountability and outcomes, rather than celebrating distributed leadership as an inherently collaborative reform or simply renaming delegated work.
-
- Vol 6 PE: App E
- Vol 6 RE: Chapter 5
distributed leadershipteacher leadershipschool improvementleadership capacitypower relationsorganisational coordinationleadership accountabilitycausal evidenceJournal article Evidence summaryAt a glance
Harris reviews distributed leadership as a perspective on school improvement and asks whether its appeal is supported by sufficient conceptual and empirical clarity. Distributed leadership shifts attention from the principal alone toward leadership activity arising through interactions among formal leaders, teachers, teams, and organisational structures.
Key ideas
Evidence from improving schools suggests that multiple sources of influence, teacher leadership, collaboration, and capacity building can support change. Distribution is not automatically beneficial, however. It may be unplanned, fragmented, coercive, or used to delegate workload without authority; power relations and the principal’s role remain consequential. Harris distinguishes descriptive claims about how leadership is distributed from normative claims that it should be distributed and improve outcomes. The literature available in 2004 offered promising associations but limited causal evidence about which configurations work under which conditions.
Why it matters
Schools should therefore develop expertise, trust, participation, coordination, and accountability deliberately, then evaluate effects on teaching and learning. Merely multiplying leadership roles or labelling existing committees “distributed” does not constitute improvement.
-
- Vol 4 RE: Chapter 23
distributed leadershiporganisational changeleadership coordinationprofessional capacityshared influenceschool improvementJournal article Evidence summaryAt a glance
Harris synthesises evidence on relationships among distributed leadership, organisational change, and outcomes. The review draws across leadership, school improvement, school effectiveness, and organisational-change research.
Key ideas
It finds indications that leadership distribution can relate positively to change and performance, but effects depend on the pattern and quality of distribution rather than the number of participants alone. Coordinated forms that mobilise expertise, build capacity, and connect influence with shared purposes differ from fragmented delegation or participation without authority. Formal leadership remains important in creating conditions, developing people, brokering relationships, and securing coherence. Distributed leadership is therefore neither synonymous with democracy nor inherently effective. The evidence base is methodologically difficult: constructs vary, leadership and outcomes influence one another, and much research is correlational or context-specific.
Why it matters
Harris takes a cautiously normative position while calling for stronger empirical studies of mechanisms and consequences. Practitioners should examine who exercises influence, how work is coordinated, whose expertise and voice count, and whether particular configurations measurably improve organisational learning and student experience.
View or buy the cited work >>Read a similar article free online >>
-
- Vol 6 RE: Chapter 6
adaptive leadershipdistributed leadershiprelational trustorganisational resilienceremote teachingeducational equityJournal article Evidence summaryAt a glance
Harris and Jones reflect on school leadership during the early COVID-19 disruption, when closures, remote teaching, public-health requirements, and uncertainty transformed everyday educational work. They argue that leadership became necessarily adaptive, responsive, and distributed because no single leader possessed the information or capacity to manage rapidly changing conditions alone.
Key ideas
Trust, collaboration, communication, networks, and collective problem solving became practical necessities. Leaders also had to protect wellbeing, respond to inequitable access and family circumstances, support teachers learning unfamiliar practices, and make decisions with incomplete evidence. The crisis exposed the limits of rigid plans and heroic-leader models while increasing the importance of context-sensitive professional judgement. Digital technology enabled continuity but did not remove social, pedagogical, or equity challenges.
Why it matters
This short editorial is a contemporaneous conceptual response, not an empirical evaluation of leadership effects, and its claims should be tested against later evidence. Its durable implication is to build collaborative capacity, relational trust, learning networks, and organisational resilience before emergencies rather than attempting to improvise them only after disruption occurs.
A transparent research trail
More than a bibliography.
What it contributes
Evidence summaries explain the central idea and why the source matters to educators.
How to access it
Entries link to lawful full text where available, or to a publisher, library or purchase page.
Edition abbreviations
- TE
- Teacher Edition
- PE
- Practice Edition
- RE
- Research Edition
Citation checks
References are checked against publisher records, scholarly indexes, DOI or ISBN metadata, repositories and author records where available. An entry marked [Citation not verified] preserves the wording found in the relevant volume without attributing findings to an unconfirmed work.
From sources to a coherent pathway