Where it is used
Each entry identifies the volume, edition, chapter or appendix in which the work appears.
The evidence behind the series
Follow the research.
Explore every source.
Browse the scientific research and professional literature used across all seven volumes of The Science of Learning for Educators.
7book volumes
8author ranges
1searchable library
Search the collection
Find a paper, author or idea.
Choose an author range, search a title or concept, or narrow the collection by source type. Open any result to see where it appears in the books, read its evidence summary and follow available source links.
4 references
-
- Vol 4 RE: App C
- Vol 4 TE: App C
self-directed playchildhood autonomyage-mixed interactionintrinsic motivationdemocratic schoolingsocial learningBook Evidence summaryAt a glance
Gray argues that children possess evolved capacities to learn through self-directed play, exploration, observation, conversation, and participation in community life.
Key ideas
Drawing on hunter-gatherer accounts, play research, democratic schooling, unschooling, and historical changes in childhood, he claims that autonomy, age-mixed interaction, access to tools and knowledgeable adults, and meaningful participation allow curiosity and social learning to flourish. Play is self-chosen, intrinsically motivated, imaginative, rule-governed by participants, and conducted in an alert but relatively non-threatened state; through it children practise problem solving, negotiation, emotional regulation, and responsibility. The book criticises expansion of compulsory, test-driven schooling and decline of independent activity, connecting these trends with stress and reduced agency. Its evidence combines research, historical interpretation, surveys, cases, and advocacy rather than randomised comparisons of entire educational systems.
Why it matters
Educational application should therefore distinguish the well-supported developmental value of play and autonomy from stronger causal claims, while ensuring safety, inclusion, rich environments, caring adults, and access to knowledge for children with differing needs and circumstances.
View or buy the cited work >>Read a similar article free online >>
-
- Vol 4 RE: Chapter 6
self-regulated learningcontinuing educationachievement motivationlearning engagementorganisational learning culturejob controllearning performanceJournal article Evidence summaryAt a glance
Hemmler and Ifenthaler systematically review and meta-analyse factors associated with adults’ use of self-regulated learning strategies in continuing education. Across 58 studies, they organise correlates into learning-process, learner, continuing-education, and work-related factors and use three-level random-effects models to accommodate dependent effects.
Key ideas
Strategy use showed positive relationships with achievement motivation, learning performance, engagement, satisfaction, prior knowledge, prior continuing-education experience, organisational learning culture, job control, and job demands, while avoidance behaviour related negatively. Associations were strongest for engagement and performance among the reported estimates, though considerable heterogeneity remained. Variable operationalisation, learning setting, and the work-relatedness of continuing education moderated some results. The synthesis shows that self-regulation is not solely an individual trait: course design and workplace conditions also matter.
Why it matters
Correlational evidence dominates the included literature, measures and contexts vary, and meta-analytic association does not prove which interventions cause improvement. The authors call for better-specified research on moderators and provide a basis for designing supports that connect motivation, learning processes, educational environments, and work contexts.
-
- Vol 2 RE: Chapter 4
- Vol 2 TE: App B
- Vol 4 RE: Chapters 10, 14, 16, 22, App A, App B, App C
- Vol 4 TE: App C
problem-based learningself-directed learningcollaborative problem solvingflexible knowledgeintrinsic motivationinstructional scaffoldingprior knowledgeJournal article Evidence summaryAt a glance
Hmelo-Silver reviews what students learn through problem-based learning and the processes intended to produce those outcomes. In PBL, learners work collaboratively on a complex problem without one predetermined answer, identify what they need to know, pursue self-directed study, apply new knowledge, and reflect on both the solution and their strategies.
Key ideas
The teacher facilitates rather than simply transmits information. The approach aims to develop flexible knowledge, effective problem-solving, self-directed learning, collaboration, and intrinsic motivation. The review connects these goals with cognitive and motivational theory and examines evidence from medical and other professional education. Students may acquire somewhat less immediately testable factual knowledge in some comparisons, yet often show advantages in application, retention, reasoning, and learning skills, with outcomes depending on curriculum design and assessment. Tutorial interaction, prior knowledge, problem quality, group functioning, and facilitation shape the learning process.
Why it matters
PBL is therefore not a single treatment or unguided discovery. Its effectiveness depends on scaffolding inquiry, aligning problems and assessments with goals, and supporting students as responsibility gradually shifts toward them.
-
- Vol 4 RE: App D
brain plasticityattention regulationretrieval practicespaced practicememory consolidationmotivationsleep and recoverysocial interactionBook Evidence summaryAt a glance
In this Finnish-language popular-science book, Huotilainen explains learning as a biological, psychological, and social process rather than a simple act of storing information. The brain changes through use, and attention, prior knowledge, practice, retrieval, feedback, emotion, motivation, sleep, recovery, physical activity, music, and social interaction all shape what can be learned and retained.
Key ideas
Learning capacity varies across moments and people because arousal, stress, fatigue, interest, and environmental demands affect cognitive resources. The book connects neuroscience findings with everyday study, teaching, work, and lifelong learning, while warning against simplistic brain-based recipes. Effective practice is active and spaced, links new material with existing understanding, permits errors and correction, and alternates focused effort with consolidation and rest. Teachers and learners can influence conditions for attention and engagement, but a neural explanation does not replace pedagogical judgement or individual context.
Why it matters
The authoritative publication record dates the book to 2019, correcting the reference’s 2018 date. Its central message is hopeful: brains remain plastic, but sustainable learning depends on how activity, environment, wellbeing, and meaning work together.
View or buy the cited work >>Read a similar article free online >>
A transparent research trail
More than a bibliography.
What it contributes
Evidence summaries explain the central idea and why the source matters to educators.
How to access it
Entries link to lawful full text where available, or to a publisher, library or purchase page.
Edition abbreviations
- TE
- Teacher Edition
- PE
- Practice Edition
- RE
- Research Edition
Citation checks
References are checked against publisher records, scholarly indexes, DOI or ISBN metadata, repositories and author records where available. An entry marked [Citation not verified] preserves the wording found in the relevant volume without attributing findings to an unconfirmed work.
From sources to a coherent pathway