Where it is used
Each entry identifies the volume, edition, chapter or appendix in which the work appears.
The evidence behind the series
Follow the research.
Explore every source.
Browse the scientific research and professional literature used across all seven volumes of The Science of Learning for Educators.
7book volumes
8author ranges
1searchable library
Search the collection
Find a paper, author or idea.
Choose an author range, search a title or concept, or narrow the collection by source type. Open any result to see where it appears in the books, read its evidence summary and follow available source links.
2 references
-
- Vol 3 RE: Chapters 6, 10, 11
- Vol 3 TE: App C
cooperative learningpositive interdependenceindividual accountabilitypromotive interactionsocial skills instructiongroup-process reflectiondialogic reasoningcollaborative assessmentBook Evidence summaryAt a glance
Gillies connects research on cooperative learning with detailed guidance for establishing productive classroom groups. Cooperative learning is more than seating students together: tasks and routines should create positive interdependence, individual accountability, promotive interaction, social skills, and reflection on group processes.
Key ideas
The teacher structures goals and resources, teaches students how to explain reasoning, ask questions, disagree constructively, and support participation, then monitors talk and intervenes with prompts that extend thinking rather than taking over the task. The book reviews cognitive, motivational, and social foundations, considers diverse learners and age groups, and addresses assessment of both outcomes and collaboration. Case studies and exercises show common implementation difficulties, including unequal participation, off-task talk, status differences, time pressure, and teachers’ uncertainty about relinquishing control. Cooperative learning is not inherently effective whenever work is done in groups.
Why it matters
Its benefits depend on intellectually worthwhile tasks, explicit preparation, accountable contributions, skilful discourse, observation, feedback, and repeated opportunities for groups and teachers to improve.
View or buy the cited work >>Read a similar article free online >>
-
- Vol 3 RE: Chapters 5, 9, 13
inquiry-based sciencestructured group workdialogic teachingevidence evaluationpositive interdependenceindividual accountabilityshared understandingteacher facilitationJournal article Evidence summaryAt a glance
Gillies reviews how cooperative learning can strengthen inquiry-based science by making students’ reasoning, questioning, and evidence evaluation socially interactive. Inquiry asks learners to investigate authentic problems, propose and test explanations, compare ideas, and reconcile new evidence with prior understanding.
Key ideas
Productive cooperation, however, does not arise merely from placing students in groups. Teachers need to establish norms for respectful dialogue, create positive interdependence and individual accountability, teach interpersonal skills, use manageable mixed groups, and scaffold explanations and challenges. The review emphasizes dialogic teaching: teachers invite elaboration and justification while students learn to listen, question, rebut misconceptions, and build shared understanding. Evidence summarized from structured-group studies indicates stronger cooperation, interaction, and learning than in unstructured groups, although implementation requires substantial teacher learning and classroom management.
Why it matters
The article’s practical message is that inquiry and cooperation are mutually reinforcing only when group processes are explicitly designed. Teachers remain active as designers, models, questioners, and facilitators rather than withdrawing from instruction.
A transparent research trail
More than a bibliography.
What it contributes
Evidence summaries explain the central idea and why the source matters to educators.
How to access it
Entries link to lawful full text where available, or to a publisher, library or purchase page.
Edition abbreviations
- TE
- Teacher Edition
- PE
- Practice Edition
- RE
- Research Edition
Citation checks
References are checked against publisher records, scholarly indexes, DOI or ISBN metadata, repositories and author records where available. An entry marked [Citation not verified] preserves the wording found in the relevant volume without attributing findings to an unconfirmed work.
From sources to a coherent pathway