Where it is used
Each entry identifies the volume, edition, chapter or appendix in which the work appears.
The evidence behind the series
Follow the research.
Explore every source.
Browse the scientific research and professional literature used across all seven volumes of The Science of Learning for Educators.
7book volumes
8author ranges
1searchable library
Search the collection
Find a paper, author or idea.
Choose an author range, search a title or concept, or narrow the collection by source type. Open any result to see where it appears in the books, read its evidence summary and follow available source links.
3 references
-
- Vol 2 RE: Chapter 4
- Vol 2 TE: App B
- Vol 4 RE: Chapters 10, 14, 16, 22, App A, App B, App C
- Vol 4 TE: App C
problem-based learningself-directed learningcollaborative problem solvingflexible knowledgeintrinsic motivationinstructional scaffoldingprior knowledgeJournal article Evidence summaryAt a glance
Hmelo-Silver reviews what students learn through problem-based learning and the processes intended to produce those outcomes. In PBL, learners work collaboratively on a complex problem without one predetermined answer, identify what they need to know, pursue self-directed study, apply new knowledge, and reflect on both the solution and their strategies.
Key ideas
The teacher facilitates rather than simply transmits information. The approach aims to develop flexible knowledge, effective problem-solving, self-directed learning, collaboration, and intrinsic motivation. The review connects these goals with cognitive and motivational theory and examines evidence from medical and other professional education. Students may acquire somewhat less immediately testable factual knowledge in some comparisons, yet often show advantages in application, retention, reasoning, and learning skills, with outcomes depending on curriculum design and assessment. Tutorial interaction, prior knowledge, problem quality, group functioning, and facilitation shape the learning process.
Why it matters
PBL is therefore not a single treatment or unguided discovery. Its effectiveness depends on scaffolding inquiry, aligning problems and assessments with goals, and supporting students as responsibility gradually shifts toward them.
-
- Vol 4 TE: App C
self-directed learningchildhood curiosityexperiential learningtheory formationlearning through playlearner autonomyobservational pedagogyBook Evidence summaryAt a glance
Holt develops an observational account of how young children learn when curiosity, experimentation, and purposeful activity are allowed to guide them. Drawing on episodes involving talk, reading, games, movement, art, and mathematics, he argues that children form and test theories about the world rather than passively absorbing adult explanations.
Key ideas
Their errors are therefore informative steps in inquiry, not simply failures to be corrected. The book contrasts this confident, self-directed learning with schooling that can make children cautious, dependent on approval, or preoccupied with producing the expected answer. Holt’s practical message is to watch children closely, respect the logic behind their attempts, provide rich opportunities and materials, and intervene sparingly. The work is based primarily on reflective observation rather than controlled research, so its claims should be read as a provocative educational interpretation.
Why it matters
Its enduring contribution is a detailed case for trust, autonomy, play, and attentive adult support in learning.
View or buy the cited work >>Read a similar article free online >>
-
- Vol 4 RE: Chapters 16, 20, App C
institutional schoolingcredentialismlearning webspeer learningself-directed learningvoluntary learningcompulsory curriculaprofessional authorityBook Evidence summaryAt a glance
Illich offers a radical critique of institutional schooling and the social beliefs it reinforces. He argues that modern societies confuse teaching with learning, credentials with competence, attendance with achievement, and institutional provision with genuine value.
Key ideas
Schools consequently reproduce inequality while encouraging dependence on professional authorities and packaged services. Illich does not merely propose reforming classrooms; he calls for separating education from compulsory, age-graded institutions and redirecting resources toward voluntary learning. His alternative is a set of decentralized “learning webs” that would give people access to educational objects, enable skill exchanges, match peers with shared interests, and make independent educators publicly discoverable. Technology could support these networks, but only if it expands personal initiative rather than strengthening institutional control.
Why it matters
The book’s central distinction is between education as a managed commodity and learning as an activity embedded throughout life and community. Its proposals remain provocative because they challenge credentialism, compulsory curricula, and the monopoly of schools while anticipating networked, peer-based, and self-directed forms of learning.
View or buy the cited work >>Read a similar article free online >>
A transparent research trail
More than a bibliography.
What it contributes
Evidence summaries explain the central idea and why the source matters to educators.
How to access it
Entries link to lawful full text where available, or to a publisher, library or purchase page.
Edition abbreviations
- TE
- Teacher Edition
- PE
- Practice Edition
- RE
- Research Edition
Citation checks
References are checked against publisher records, scholarly indexes, DOI or ISBN metadata, repositories and author records where available. An entry marked [Citation not verified] preserves the wording found in the relevant volume without attributing findings to an unconfirmed work.
From sources to a coherent pathway