Where it is used
Each entry identifies the volume, edition, chapter or appendix in which the work appears.
The evidence behind the series
Browse the scientific research and professional literature used across all seven volumes of The Science of Learning for Educators.
Search the collection
Choose an author range, search a title or concept, or narrow the collection by source type. Open any result to see where it appears in the books, read its evidence summary and follow available source links.
1 reference
Leithwood and Mascall investigate collective leadership using 2,570 teacher surveys from 90 schools and three-year language and mathematics achievement data. Respondents estimated influence exercised by principals, school teams, teachers, parents, and students.
Path analyses found that collective leadership explained a significant portion of between-school achievement variation, largely through teacher motivation, working conditions, and organisational variables. Principals retained the greatest influence at all achievement levels, yet higher-achieving schools attributed more influence to a wider set of participants, especially teams, parents, and students. The authors describe influence as potentially expansive: formal leaders can enable others’ participation without necessarily losing their own capacity. Collective leadership is not equivalent to every person deciding everything or to uncoordinated delegation. Distribution needs shared direction, expertise, supportive relationships, and structures connecting influence to teaching and learning.
Because the study is cross-sectional at the survey level and uses observational path modelling, associations do not establish that distributing leadership causes higher achievement; successful schools may also distribute influence more readily. The findings support examining who influences decisions, through what mechanisms, and with what effects on teachers and students.
A transparent research trail
Each entry identifies the volume, edition, chapter or appendix in which the work appears.
Evidence summaries explain the central idea and why the source matters to educators.
Entries link to lawful full text where available, or to a publisher, library or purchase page.
References are checked against publisher records, scholarly indexes, DOI or ISBN metadata, repositories and author records where available. An entry marked [Citation not verified] preserves the wording found in the relevant volume without attributing findings to an unconfirmed work.
From sources to a coherent pathway