Where it is used
Each entry identifies the volume, edition, chapter or appendix in which the work appears.
The evidence behind the series
Follow the research.
Explore every source.
Browse the scientific research and professional literature used across all seven volumes of The Science of Learning for Educators.
7book volumes
8author ranges
1searchable library
Search the collection
Find a paper, author or idea.
Choose an author range, search a title or concept, or narrow the collection by source type. Open any result to see where it appears in the books, read its evidence summary and follow available source links.
2 references
-
- Vol 4 RE: App D
multimodal datacollaborative regulationphysiological synchronyelectrodermal activitytemporal alignmentinteraction analysisregulatory episodesqualitative interpretationJournal article Evidence summaryAt a glance
Järvelä and colleagues examine how multimodal evidence can illuminate students’ regulation during collaborative learning. Regulation involves cognition, motivation, emotion, and behaviour unfolding over time, yet many processes are internal, transient, and difficult to capture with a single method.
Key ideas
The authors align video and interaction records with electrodermal activity and other process evidence to identify episodes in which learners encounter challenges, share arousal, and regulate together. Their methodological argument is that physiological data do not explain learning by themselves. Arousal may reflect many things, and meaningful inference requires temporal alignment with observable activity, discourse, task demands, and theory-based coding. Multimodal analysis can expose discrepancies between what learners report and what occurs, reveal synchrony or transitions, and help researchers locate consequential moments for closer qualitative interpretation. The study illustrates opportunities and limitations rather than offering a ready automated intervention.
Why it matters
Its contribution is a framework for grounding analytics in regulated-learning theory and preserving context. Future systems might support awareness and timely scaffolding, but indicators require validation, transparent interpretation, and careful attention to privacy and the risk of reducing complex regulation to convenient signals.
-
- Vol 3 TE: App C
computer-supported collaborative learningsociocultural learningdistributed cognitioncollaborative knowledge buildingshared meaning-makingsocial interactioninteraction analysiscommunity normsConference paper Evidence summaryAt a glance
Lipponen reviews the emerging foundations of computer-supported collaborative learning (CSCL) six years after it was identified as a distinct educational-technology paradigm. The paper argues that CSCL should not be reduced to placing learners together around networked tools.
Key ideas
Its central concern is how technology can support social interaction, shared meaning-making, and the construction of knowledge within a community. Lipponen surveys theoretical roots in sociocultural learning, distributed cognition, and collaborative knowledge building, then examines recurring empirical and methodological difficulties. These include defining genuine collaboration, analysing interaction at both individual and group levels, and connecting the affordances of software with pedagogical practices. The review also distinguishes cooperation, in which work may be divided, from collaboration involving sustained joint engagement.
Why it matters
For educators and designers, the main implication is that productive CSCL depends on deliberately structured tasks, discourse, participation, and community norms; technology provides conditions for collaboration but does not itself create it.
A transparent research trail
More than a bibliography.
What it contributes
Evidence summaries explain the central idea and why the source matters to educators.
How to access it
Entries link to lawful full text where available, or to a publisher, library or purchase page.
Edition abbreviations
- TE
- Teacher Edition
- PE
- Practice Edition
- RE
- Research Edition
Citation checks
References are checked against publisher records, scholarly indexes, DOI or ISBN metadata, repositories and author records where available. An entry marked [Citation not verified] preserves the wording found in the relevant volume without attributing findings to an unconfirmed work.
From sources to a coherent pathway