Where it is used
Each entry identifies the volume, edition, chapter or appendix in which the work appears.
The evidence behind the series
Browse the scientific research and professional literature used across all seven volumes of The Science of Learning for Educators.
Search the collection
Choose an author range, search a title or concept, or narrow the collection by source type. Open any result to see where it appears in the books, read its evidence summary and follow available source links.
1 reference
Kirschner, Paas, and Kirschner use cognitive load theory to explain when collaborative learning may be more efficient than individual learning. Working memory is limited, and complex tasks can exceed one learner’s processing capacity.
A group can distribute interacting information across several working memories, combine complementary knowledge, and build a shared representation. Collaboration also creates transaction costs: communicating, coordinating, resolving different interpretations, and maintaining shared awareness consume resources. For simple tasks these costs may outweigh the benefit, making individual work more efficient. As intrinsic task complexity rises, distribution can become advantageous, especially when members possess relevant knowledge and coordinate effectively. The authors review an inconsistent literature and propose task complexity as a key moderator rather than treating group learning as uniformly superior. They distinguish performance, learning, mental effort, and efficiency, since a group may solve a task without every member acquiring transferable schemas.
Instructional design should therefore select complex tasks, ensure individual accountability and participation, support coordination, and assess individual transfer. The article offers a theoretical framework and research agenda rather than a universal rule to put learners into groups.
A transparent research trail
Each entry identifies the volume, edition, chapter or appendix in which the work appears.
Evidence summaries explain the central idea and why the source matters to educators.
Entries link to lawful full text where available, or to a publisher, library or purchase page.
References are checked against publisher records, scholarly indexes, DOI or ISBN metadata, repositories and author records where available. An entry marked [Citation not verified] preserves the wording found in the relevant volume without attributing findings to an unconfirmed work.
From sources to a coherent pathway