Where it is used
Each entry identifies the volume, edition, chapter or appendix in which the work appears.
The evidence behind the series
Follow the research.
Explore every source.
Browse the scientific research and professional literature used across all seven volumes of The Science of Learning for Educators.
7book volumes
8author ranges
1searchable library
Search the collection
Find a paper, author or idea.
Choose an author range, search a title or concept, or narrow the collection by source type. Open any result to see where it appears in the books, read its evidence summary and follow available source links.
2 references
-
- Vol 4 RE: App D
human–ai collaborationsocially shared regulationtrigger eventsmachine learningmultimodal tracesexplainable ailearner agencygroup dialogueJournal article Evidence summaryAt a glance
Järvelä, Nguyen, and Hadwin propose human–AI collaboration for socially shared regulation of learning rather than automation that replaces human judgement. Collaborative groups encounter trigger events—cognitive, motivational, emotional, or social challenges—that require members to notice a problem, interpret it, set or revise goals, select strategies, monitor action, and adapt together.
Key ideas
Multimodal traces and machine learning may help detect patterns that are difficult for participants or researchers to see in real time. The authors’ hybrid human–AI shared regulation model treats people and AI as interacting subsystems with different strengths: computation can integrate streams and recognise candidate events, while learners and teachers contribute contextual meaning, values, goals, agency, and responsibility. AI outputs should therefore prompt awareness, reflection, and group dialogue rather than issue opaque prescriptions. The paper illustrates a research programme and propositions, not a validated classroom product.
Why it matters
Key challenges include theoretical grounding, explainability, privacy, bias, data quality, timing, and maintaining learner control. Productive systems must be co-designed and evaluated for whether they genuinely strengthen regulation and learning.
-
- Vol 4 RE: App D
regulatory activitiestrigger eventsmultimodal process dataepisode-rule miningphysiological arousalsequence analysislong short-term memorypredictive analyticsJournal article Evidence summaryAt a glance
Järvelä and colleagues investigate whether multimodal process data can identify and predict regulatory activity during collaborative learning. They focus on trigger events: difficult situations that may disrupt progress and invite groups to regulate cognition, motivation, emotion, or social interaction.
Key ideas
The study combines coded interaction with process and episode-rule mining and examines shared physiological arousal events as possible signals of moments requiring adaptation. Sequential analyses reveal patterns in socially shared regulation, and long short-term memory models show potential for predicting regulatory activities. The aim is not to equate arousal with regulation; physiological coincidence is an ambiguous indicator that gains meaning only when aligned with discourse, behaviour, task context, and theoretically grounded coding. Findings illustrate how AI might help researchers and, eventually, learners recognise consequential moments in complex collaboration.
Why it matters
Prediction accuracy alone does not establish educational benefit, and deployment would raise questions about generalisation, privacy, interpretation, and intervention timing. The work is best understood as a proof of concept for augmenting human awareness and inquiry, with further research needed before automated prompts can responsibly optimise group learning.
A transparent research trail
More than a bibliography.
What it contributes
Evidence summaries explain the central idea and why the source matters to educators.
How to access it
Entries link to lawful full text where available, or to a publisher, library or purchase page.
Edition abbreviations
- TE
- Teacher Edition
- PE
- Practice Edition
- RE
- Research Edition
Citation checks
References are checked against publisher records, scholarly indexes, DOI or ISBN metadata, repositories and author records where available. An entry marked [Citation not verified] preserves the wording found in the relevant volume without attributing findings to an unconfirmed work.
From sources to a coherent pathway