Where it is used
Each entry identifies the volume, edition, chapter or appendix in which the work appears.
The evidence behind the series
Browse the scientific research and professional literature used across all seven volumes of The Science of Learning for Educators.
Search the collection
Choose an author range, search a title or concept, or narrow the collection by source type. Open any result to see where it appears in the books, read its evidence summary and follow available source links.
1 reference
Kornell, Hays, and Bjork ask whether attempting retrieval before receiving an answer helps or harms learning when the attempt is certain to fail. Participants saw unfamiliar or fictional general-knowledge questions, tried to generate answers, and then studied the correct responses.
Later memory was better than after studying intact question-and-answer pairs without the prior attempt. Experiments ruled out several simple explanations and showed that an unsuccessful search can prepare the learner to encode feedback more effectively. A question may activate related knowledge, focus attention on the relevant gap, create curiosity, and make the eventual answer more distinctive. The result does not justify prolonged guessing without correction. Benefits depend on prompt access to accurate feedback and a task in which the failed attempt engages relevant processing rather than reinforcing an attractive misconception.
Errorless study can feel efficient, yet it may produce weaker encoding than a brief challenge followed by resolution. The practical pattern is pretesting or prediction with low stakes: ask learners to commit to an answer, then reveal and explain the correct response and revisit it through later retrieval.
A transparent research trail
Each entry identifies the volume, edition, chapter or appendix in which the work appears.
Evidence summaries explain the central idea and why the source matters to educators.
Entries link to lawful full text where available, or to a publisher, library or purchase page.
References are checked against publisher records, scholarly indexes, DOI or ISBN metadata, repositories and author records where available. An entry marked [Citation not verified] preserves the wording found in the relevant volume without attributing findings to an unconfirmed work.
From sources to a coherent pathway