Where it is used
Each entry identifies the volume, edition, chapter or appendix in which the work appears.
The evidence behind the series
Follow the research.
Explore every source.
Browse the scientific research and professional literature used across all seven volumes of The Science of Learning for Educators.
7book volumes
8author ranges
1searchable library
Search the collection
Find a paper, author or idea.
Choose an author range, search a title or concept, or narrow the collection by source type. Open any result to see where it appears in the books, read its evidence summary and follow available source links.
3 references
-
- Vol 2 RE: Chapter 8
mathematical reasoningproblem-solving tasksmathematical discourseproductive struggleconceptual understandingmathematical representationsaccess and equityBook Evidence summaryAt a glance
NCTM translates standards for school mathematics into coordinated actions for classrooms, schools, districts, and policy. Six guiding principles address teaching and learning, access and equity, curriculum, tools and technology, assessment, and professionalism.
Key ideas
At the classroom level, eight research-informed practices call on teachers to establish meaningful goals, use tasks that promote reasoning and problem solving, connect mathematical representations, facilitate purposeful discourse, pose purposeful questions, build procedural fluency from conceptual understanding, support productive struggle, and use evidence of student thinking. The book contrasts productive and unproductive beliefs and describes observable teacher and student actions associated with each practice. It argues that high expectations must be matched by access to strong instruction and appropriate support for every learner. Assessment should inform ongoing decisions rather than merely rank students, while collaboration and professional learning make improvement sustainable.
Why it matters
The central message is systemic: ambitious mathematical learning does not follow from standards alone; it requires coherent curriculum, knowledgeable teaching, equitable opportunities, evidence-responsive leadership, and organizational conditions that consistently support the recommended practices.
View or buy the cited work >>Read a similar article free online >>
-
- Vol 2 RE: Chapter 8
mathematical proficiencyconceptual understandingprocedural fluencystrategic competenceadaptive reasoningproductive dispositionmathematical problem solvingReport Evidence summaryAt a glance
Adding It Up synthesises research on how children from prekindergarten through grade eight learn number and operations. Its influential model defines mathematical proficiency as five interwoven strands: conceptual understanding, procedural fluency, strategic competence, adaptive reasoning, and productive disposition.
Key ideas
No strand is sufficient alone, and progress in one can strengthen the others. The report examines children’s developing ideas about whole numbers, rational numbers, computation, and problem solving, then considers teaching, curriculum, assessment, teacher knowledge, and school organisation. Effective instruction builds on learners’ strategies, connects representations and procedures to meaning, asks students to reason and explain, and provides sustained opportunities for practice and problem solving. It rejects both a facts-versus-understanding dichotomy and the expectation that proficiency emerges from unguided activity.
Why it matters
For educators, assessment should sample all five strands and reveal thinking; improvement requires coherent materials, knowledgeable teachers, equitable expectations, and systems that give learners enough time to develop durable and confident mathematical competence.
-
- Vol 2 RE: Chapter 9
scientific argumentationcollaborative discourseevidence-based reasoningconceptual understandingcounterargumentscience educationJournal article Evidence summaryAt a glance
Osborne argues that scientific understanding requires knowing not only established explanations but how claims are evaluated through evidence and critical discourse. Classroom science often privileges authoritative presentation and practical activity while offering too little opportunity to compare explanations, challenge reasoning, and justify conclusions.
Key ideas
Research reviewed in the article suggests that structured argumentation can improve conceptual understanding, reasoning, and understanding of scientific practice. Productive argument involves claims, evidence, warrants, counterarguments, and revision, undertaken collaboratively rather than as competitive debate. Such discourse does not emerge automatically: students need worthwhile questions, relevant knowledge and data, norms for respectful critique, language support, and teachers who press for justification without taking over the reasoning. Teachers therefore require professional learning in recognising and facilitating argument.
Why it matters
For educators, the paper supports designing regular opportunities for students to make thinking public, evaluate alternatives, and change their minds in response to evidence. The aim is disciplined sensemaking, not simply increasing the amount of classroom talk.
A transparent research trail
More than a bibliography.
What it contributes
Evidence summaries explain the central idea and why the source matters to educators.
How to access it
Entries link to lawful full text where available, or to a publisher, library or purchase page.
Edition abbreviations
- TE
- Teacher Edition
- PE
- Practice Edition
- RE
- Research Edition
Citation checks
References are checked against publisher records, scholarly indexes, DOI or ISBN metadata, repositories and author records where available. An entry marked [Citation not verified] preserves the wording found in the relevant volume without attributing findings to an unconfirmed work.
From sources to a coherent pathway