Where it is used
Each entry identifies the volume, edition, chapter or appendix in which the work appears.
The evidence behind the series
Browse the scientific research and professional literature used across all seven volumes of The Science of Learning for Educators.
Search the collection
Choose an author range, search a title or concept, or narrow the collection by source type. Open any result to see where it appears in the books, read its evidence summary and follow available source links.
1 reference
Mueller's online toolbox guides educators through the design of authentic assessment, defined as asking students to perform meaningful real-world tasks that demonstrate application of essential knowledge and skills. It contrasts direct evidence from performances and products with conventional selected-response testing, while recognizing that both can serve different purposes.
The design process begins by identifying standards or valued outcomes, then creating a task that elicits those outcomes, specifying criteria for good performance, and constructing a rubric that communicates levels of quality. The resource explains analytic and holistic rubrics, offers templates and examples across disciplines, and encourages involving students in interpreting or developing criteria. Authentic tasks can increase relevance, reveal complex understanding, and support self-assessment, but they require careful alignment, feasible administration, and reliable judgment. The toolbox treats assessment as part of learning rather than merely final measurement: clear criteria and feedback help students monitor progress, revise work, and transfer knowledge.
Its examples make an abstract assessment philosophy usable for course and program design.
A transparent research trail
Each entry identifies the volume, edition, chapter or appendix in which the work appears.
Evidence summaries explain the central idea and why the source matters to educators.
Entries link to lawful full text where available, or to a publisher, library or purchase page.
References are checked against publisher records, scholarly indexes, DOI or ISBN metadata, repositories and author records where available. An entry marked [Citation not verified] preserves the wording found in the relevant volume without attributing findings to an unconfirmed work.
From sources to a coherent pathway