Where it is used
Each entry identifies the volume, edition, chapter or appendix in which the work appears.
The evidence behind the series
Follow the research.
Explore every source.
Browse the scientific research and professional literature used across all seven volumes of The Science of Learning for Educators.
7book volumes
8author ranges
1searchable library
Search the collection
Find a paper, author or idea.
Choose an author range, search a title or concept, or narrow the collection by source type. Open any result to see where it appears in the books, read its evidence summary and follow available source links.
3 references
-
- Vol 4 RE: Chapter 1
meaningful learningrote learningknowledge transferknowledge constructioncognitive processesassessment alignmentprior knowledgebloom taxonomyJournal article Evidence summaryAt a glance
Mayer distinguishes learning that supports only retention from learning that supports both retention and transfer. Using the revised Bloom taxonomy, he describes meaningful learning as knowledge construction: learners select relevant information, organise it into coherent mental representations, and integrate those representations with prior knowledge.
Key ideas
The article crosses two learning outcomes—remembering and transferring—with three instructional scenarios. No learning yields poor retention and transfer; rote learning yields adequate retention but weak transfer; meaningful learning yields both. Mayer then maps six categories of cognitive processes—remember, understand, apply, analyse, evaluate, and create—onto assessment tasks. The practical implication is that instruction and assessment must be aligned with the intended cognitive outcome.
Why it matters
If teaching emphasises isolated facts and tests only recall, students have little reason to build transferable understanding. Meaningful learning instead requires explanations, organisation, comparison, inference, application, and opportunities to use knowledge in situations that differ from the original lesson.
-
- Vol 1 RE: Chapter 4
information processing capacityimmediate memory spanchunkingrecodingabsolute judgmentmeaningful groupingworking-memory limitsprior knowledgeJournal article Evidence summaryAt a glance
Miller reviews experiments on absolute judgment, immediate memory span, and recoding, noting the recurrent appearance of limits near seven categories or items. In absolute-judgment tasks, performance is better described in bits of transmitted information, and increasing the number of stimulus dimensions can expand capacity.
Key ideas
In memory-span tasks, people recall a limited number of chunks, but a chunk can contain varying amounts of information. Recoding—grouping elements into meaningful units—therefore increases how much information can be handled without necessarily increasing the number of chunks. Miller treats the similarity between judgment and memory limits cautiously; the famous seven-plus-or-minus-two formulation is an organising observation, not a universal law that every display or lesson must contain seven items. The paper’s durable educational insight concerns organisation: prior knowledge and meaningful grouping change the functional units learners process.
Why it matters
Later working-memory research has revised numerical estimates, so instructional design should focus on manageable structure and chunking rather than applying “seven” mechanically.
-
- Vol 2 RE: App D
- Vol 5 RE: Chapters 1, 2, 4, 9, 10, 13, 15, App A
prior knowledgecultural responsivenesslearner motivationself-regulated learningknowledge transferlearning environmentslearner identityReport Evidence summaryAt a glance
How People Learn II updates the learning-science synthesis for a world in which people learn across formal education, work, families, communities, and digital environments. The report explains that learning is shaped by prior knowledge, culture, motivation, emotion, identity, social interaction, and the physical and institutional context.
Key ideas
Memory is constructive, expertise organises knowledge for flexible use, and transfer depends on recognising relevant structure rather than merely possessing information. Learners regulate attention, strategy, effort, and understanding, but these capacities develop through support and opportunity. The report also examines developmental change, informal learning, technology, and the effects of adversity and stereotype. It rejects a single universal teaching recipe: productive environments build on what learners bring, provide appropriately challenging practice and feedback, foster belonging and agency, and connect knowledge across settings.
Why it matters
For educators, assessment should reveal learners’ thinking and guide adaptation while avoiding deficit interpretations of cultural or linguistic difference.
A transparent research trail
More than a bibliography.
What it contributes
Evidence summaries explain the central idea and why the source matters to educators.
How to access it
Entries link to lawful full text where available, or to a publisher, library or purchase page.
Edition abbreviations
- TE
- Teacher Edition
- PE
- Practice Edition
- RE
- Research Edition
Citation checks
References are checked against publisher records, scholarly indexes, DOI or ISBN metadata, repositories and author records where available. An entry marked [Citation not verified] preserves the wording found in the relevant volume without attributing findings to an unconfirmed work.
From sources to a coherent pathway