Where it is used
Each entry identifies the volume, edition, chapter or appendix in which the work appears.
The evidence behind the series
Browse the scientific research and professional literature used across all seven volumes of The Science of Learning for Educators.
Search the collection
Choose an author range, search a title or concept, or narrow the collection by source type. Open any result to see where it appears in the books, read its evidence summary and follow available source links.
1 reference
McGuire investigates whether structured, timely, and emotionally intelligent feedback can improve both learning and wellbeing within competition-based higher education. The longitudinal action-research study followed four academic cycles from 2021 to 2024 and drew on performance data, surveys, learning analytics, and reflective journals from 73 students and 19 educators.
Its low-stakes model combined repeated attempts, layered feedback, numerical and comparative information, personalized commentary, and guided reflection. Results indicated lower assessment-related anxiety, stronger motivation and engagement, and improved self-regulation. Five themes describe how iterative feedback can create psychological safety and shift assessment from a one-off judgment toward a developmental process in which students retain agency. The article connects this design with self-determination theory and assessment-for-learning principles, while acknowledging the contextual and exploratory limits of the evidence.
It argues that assessment format alone does not guarantee wellbeing; how feedback is delivered, interpreted, and used matters. The model offers a practical basis for further testing across disciplines and institutions.
A transparent research trail
Each entry identifies the volume, edition, chapter or appendix in which the work appears.
Evidence summaries explain the central idea and why the source matters to educators.
Entries link to lawful full text where available, or to a publisher, library or purchase page.
References are checked against publisher records, scholarly indexes, DOI or ISBN metadata, repositories and author records where available. An entry marked [Citation not verified] preserves the wording found in the relevant volume without attributing findings to an unconfirmed work.
From sources to a coherent pathway