Where it is used
Each entry identifies the volume, edition, chapter or appendix in which the work appears.
The evidence behind the series
Follow the research.
Explore every source.
Browse the scientific research and professional literature used across all seven volumes of The Science of Learning for Educators.
7book volumes
8author ranges
1searchable library
Search the collection
Find a paper, author or idea.
Choose an author range, search a title or concept, or narrow the collection by source type. Open any result to see where it appears in the books, read its evidence summary and follow available source links.
2 references
-
- Vol 4 RE: Chapter 21, App C
developmental resiliencepositive adaptationprotective factorssecure relationshipsself-regulationsupportive communitiesadversity exposuredevelopmental systemsBook Evidence summaryAt a glance
Masten synthesises decades of developmental research on resilience, defined as positive adaptation in the context of significant adversity. The book’s “ordinary magic” thesis is that resilience usually arises from common adaptive systems rather than rare, invulnerable traits.
Key ideas
These systems include secure relationships, effective caregiving, problem-solving and self-regulation, motivation to adapt, competent schools, and supportive communities. Masten traces major waves of resilience research, explains concepts and methods, and examines evidence from longitudinal studies of children facing poverty, homelessness, disaster, war, and other threats. Development is portrayed as dynamic and multisystemic: risks can accumulate, protective processes interact, and timing matters. Consequently, resilience is neither a permanent personal label nor proof that adversity is harmless.
Why it matters
Prevention and intervention should reduce exposure to risk while strengthening fundamental developmental systems. For educators, the analysis highlights dependable relationships, opportunities for mastery, routines, agency, and coordinated support as practical ways schools can help preserve or restore adaptive capacity.
View or buy the cited work >>Read a similar article free online >>
-
- Vol 5 RE: Chapter 12
formative feedbackpsychological safetyassessment anxietyself-regulationstudent agencyiterative assessmentguided reflectionself-determination theoryJournal article Evidence summaryAt a glance
McGuire investigates whether structured, timely, and emotionally intelligent feedback can improve both learning and wellbeing within competition-based higher education. The longitudinal action-research study followed four academic cycles from 2021 to 2024 and drew on performance data, surveys, learning analytics, and reflective journals from 73 students and 19 educators.
Key ideas
Its low-stakes model combined repeated attempts, layered feedback, numerical and comparative information, personalized commentary, and guided reflection. Results indicated lower assessment-related anxiety, stronger motivation and engagement, and improved self-regulation. Five themes describe how iterative feedback can create psychological safety and shift assessment from a one-off judgment toward a developmental process in which students retain agency. The article connects this design with self-determination theory and assessment-for-learning principles, while acknowledging the contextual and exploratory limits of the evidence.
Why it matters
It argues that assessment format alone does not guarantee wellbeing; how feedback is delivered, interpreted, and used matters. The model offers a practical basis for further testing across disciplines and institutions.
A transparent research trail
More than a bibliography.
What it contributes
Evidence summaries explain the central idea and why the source matters to educators.
How to access it
Entries link to lawful full text where available, or to a publisher, library or purchase page.
Edition abbreviations
- TE
- Teacher Edition
- PE
- Practice Edition
- RE
- Research Edition
Citation checks
References are checked against publisher records, scholarly indexes, DOI or ISBN metadata, repositories and author records where available. An entry marked [Citation not verified] preserves the wording found in the relevant volume without attributing findings to an unconfirmed work.
From sources to a coherent pathway