Where it is used
Each entry identifies the volume, edition, chapter or appendix in which the work appears.
The evidence behind the series
Browse the scientific research and professional literature used across all seven volumes of The Science of Learning for Educators.
Search the collection
Choose an author range, search a title or concept, or narrow the collection by source type. Open any result to see where it appears in the books, read its evidence summary and follow available source links.
1 reference
Mudau explores how four lecturers at a South African open-distance university understand e-portfolios as an alternative form of assessment. Using qualitative interviews and thematic analysis, the study reports that lecturers saw e-portfolios as supporting student-centred and authentic assessment: learners can assemble evidence over time, reflect on progress, demonstrate varied competencies, and take greater ownership of learning.
Participants also identified practical barriers, including limited lecturer and student knowledge, technology and connectivity constraints, workload, inconsistent implementation, and a lack of an agreed assessment framework. Consequently, the tool’s potential was not fully realised merely by making a platform available. The author recommends early training and a structured institutional framework to guide design and evaluation. The very small, context-specific sample means the findings illuminate perceptions rather than establish effects on achievement or validity.
For educators, the paper highlights that successful portfolio assessment requires clear purposes, criteria, scaffolding, technical support, feedback processes, and attention to equitable access.
A transparent research trail
Each entry identifies the volume, edition, chapter or appendix in which the work appears.
Evidence summaries explain the central idea and why the source matters to educators.
Entries link to lawful full text where available, or to a publisher, library or purchase page.
References are checked against publisher records, scholarly indexes, DOI or ISBN metadata, repositories and author records where available. An entry marked [Citation not verified] preserves the wording found in the relevant volume without attributing findings to an unconfirmed work.
From sources to a coherent pathway