Where it is used
Each entry identifies the volume, edition, chapter or appendix in which the work appears.
The evidence behind the series
Browse the scientific research and professional literature used across all seven volumes of The Science of Learning for Educators.
Search the collection
Choose an author range, search a title or concept, or narrow the collection by source type. Open any result to see where it appears in the books, read its evidence summary and follow available source links.
1 reference
Mercer and Dawes trace research on teacher–student classroom talk from early observational studies in the 1970s to dialogic approaches developed by the 2010s. Early work documented the pervasive initiation–response–feedback pattern, in which teachers ask questions, students supply brief answers, and teachers evaluate them.
Later sociocultural research shifted attention from counting turns to examining how language mediates thinking, participation, and the joint construction of knowledge. The review distinguishes authoritative exchanges used to transmit or check information from more dialogic interactions that invite students to explain, reason, challenge ideas, and build on others' contributions. It argues that teacher questions and follow-up moves matter because they shape whose thinking becomes visible and whether discussion advances understanding. Research has influenced professional development, policy, and classroom programs, although dialogic principles are not always implemented consistently.
The authors conclude that productive talk requires explicit educational purposes, teacher skill, supportive norms, and opportunities for extended student reasoning rather than simply increasing the amount students speak.
A transparent research trail
Each entry identifies the volume, edition, chapter or appendix in which the work appears.
Evidence summaries explain the central idea and why the source matters to educators.
Entries link to lawful full text where available, or to a publisher, library or purchase page.
References are checked against publisher records, scholarly indexes, DOI or ISBN metadata, repositories and author records where available. An entry marked [Citation not verified] preserves the wording found in the relevant volume without attributing findings to an unconfirmed work.
From sources to a coherent pathway