Where it is used
Each entry identifies the volume, edition, chapter or appendix in which the work appears.
The evidence behind the series
Browse the scientific research and professional literature used across all seven volumes of The Science of Learning for Educators.
Search the collection
Choose an author range, search a title or concept, or narrow the collection by source type. Open any result to see where it appears in the books, read its evidence summary and follow available source links.
1 reference
Patall, Cooper, and Robinson meta-analyse 41 studies testing whether giving people choices affects intrinsic motivation and related outcomes. Across child and adult samples, choice generally increased intrinsic motivation, effort, task performance, and perceived competence, but effects varied substantially with the design and form of choice.
Motivation effects were stronger for instructionally incidental choices than for choices between activities, task versions, rewards, or other instructionally consequential options; they were also stronger when participants received a small number of successive choices, when choice was not followed by rewards, and when comparison conditions were highly controlling. Effects differed with age, setting, and how researchers equated the options available to choice and no-choice groups. The findings support autonomy as one influence on motivation, not the claim that any choice is beneficial. For educators, bounded and meaningful choice can support engagement when options are manageable and compatible with learning goals.
Excessive, trivial, confusing, or poorly structured options may impose costs, so choice should be designed rather than simply added.
A transparent research trail
Each entry identifies the volume, edition, chapter or appendix in which the work appears.
Evidence summaries explain the central idea and why the source matters to educators.
Entries link to lawful full text where available, or to a publisher, library or purchase page.
References are checked against publisher records, scholarly indexes, DOI or ISBN metadata, repositories and author records where available. An entry marked [Citation not verified] preserves the wording found in the relevant volume without attributing findings to an unconfirmed work.
From sources to a coherent pathway