Where it is used
Each entry identifies the volume, edition, chapter or appendix in which the work appears.
The evidence behind the series
Follow the research.
Explore every source.
Browse the scientific research and professional literature used across all seven volumes of The Science of Learning for Educators.
7book volumes
8author ranges
1searchable library
Search the collection
Find a paper, author or idea.
Choose an author range, search a title or concept, or narrow the collection by source type. Open any result to see where it appears in the books, read its evidence summary and follow available source links.
2 references
-
- Vol 4 TE: App C
choiceintrinsic motivationperceived competencelearner autonomytask engagementbounded choicechoice architectureJournal article Evidence summaryAt a glance
Patall, Cooper, and Robinson meta-analyse 41 studies testing whether giving people choices affects intrinsic motivation and related outcomes. Across child and adult samples, choice generally increased intrinsic motivation, effort, task performance, and perceived competence, but effects varied substantially with the design and form of choice.
Key ideas
Motivation effects were stronger for instructionally incidental choices than for choices between activities, task versions, rewards, or other instructionally consequential options; they were also stronger when participants received a small number of successive choices, when choice was not followed by rewards, and when comparison conditions were highly controlling. Effects differed with age, setting, and how researchers equated the options available to choice and no-choice groups. The findings support autonomy as one influence on motivation, not the claim that any choice is beneficial. For educators, bounded and meaningful choice can support engagement when options are manageable and compatible with learning goals.
Why it matters
Excessive, trivial, confusing, or poorly structured options may impose costs, so choice should be designed rather than simply added.
-
- Vol 2 RE: App D
self-determination theoryautonomycompetencerelatednessmotivation internalizationintrinsic motivationautonomy supportpsychological needsBook Evidence summaryAt a glance
Ryan and Deci present self-determination theory as a broad account of motivation, personality development, and wellness organized through six related mini-theories. Its central claim is that people function and develop more fully when social conditions support three basic psychological needs: autonomy, the experience of acting with volition; competence, effectiveness in valued activity; and relatedness, mutual care and belonging.
Key ideas
Motivation varies in quality, not only quantity. External regulation can be internalized through introjected, identified, and integrated forms, while autonomy support promotes more durable engagement than control. The theory also distinguishes intrinsic motivation, goal contents, causality orientations, relationship processes, and vitality. Evidence spans education, work, health, sport, psychotherapy, digital environments, and culture.
Why it matters
Need support does not mean permissiveness or independence from others; structure, meaningful rationales, acknowledgement of feelings, and choice can coexist. The framework helps educators evaluate whether practices foster agency and competence or produce compliance by pressure.
View or buy the cited work >>Read a similar article free online >>
A transparent research trail
More than a bibliography.
What it contributes
Evidence summaries explain the central idea and why the source matters to educators.
How to access it
Entries link to lawful full text where available, or to a publisher, library or purchase page.
Edition abbreviations
- TE
- Teacher Edition
- PE
- Practice Edition
- RE
- Research Edition
Citation checks
References are checked against publisher records, scholarly indexes, DOI or ISBN metadata, repositories and author records where available. An entry marked [Citation not verified] preserves the wording found in the relevant volume without attributing findings to an unconfirmed work.
From sources to a coherent pathway