Where it is used
Each entry identifies the volume, edition, chapter or appendix in which the work appears.
The evidence behind the series
Follow the research.
Explore every source.
Browse the scientific research and professional literature used across all seven volumes of The Science of Learning for Educators.
7book volumes
8author ranges
1searchable library
Search the collection
Find a paper, author or idea.
Choose an author range, search a title or concept, or narrow the collection by source type. Open any result to see where it appears in the books, read its evidence summary and follow available source links.
3 references
-
- Vol 5 TE: App C
learning portfoliosstudent reflectionportfolio selectionassessment criteriagrowth over timestudent agencylearning evidenceJournal article Evidence summaryAt a glance
Paulson, Paulson, and Meyer distinguish a genuine learning portfolio from an arbitrary folder of completed work. A portfolio is a purposeful collection showing a learner’s efforts, progress, and achievements; students participate in selecting contents, identify criteria for selection and quality, and reflect on the evidence.
Key ideas
The authors describe eight characteristics. Portfolios should contain self-reflection, involve students in choosing entries, remain distinct from cumulative records, convey the learner’s activities and development, and show growth through dated or sequenced work. Their purpose may change during the year, but students should control what becomes public. Portfolios also need information that allows readers to understand the work in context and should encourage students to see patterns in their learning.
Why it matters
The central value lies in joining assessment with instruction and making students participants rather than objects of evaluation. For educators, the implication is that simply digitising or collecting assignments is insufficient: a portfolio requires an explicit purpose, selection decisions, criteria, commentary, comparison over time, and dialogue about next steps.
-
- Vol 4 RE: Chapters 13, 14, 15, 17, 19
autonomy-supportive teachingself-determination theorystudent agencypsychological needsmeaningful rationalesinformational languageteacher–student relationshipsmotivational climateJournal article Evidence summaryAt a glance
Reeve uses self-determination theory’s dialectical framework to explain how classroom conditions can support or frustrate students’ inner motivational resources. Autonomy-supportive teachers try to understand students’ perspectives, nurture interests and psychological needs, provide meaningful rationales, use informational rather than pressuring language, acknowledge negative feelings, allow time for self-directed work, and respond to student initiative.
Key ideas
A controlling style instead relies more heavily on directives, external incentives, deadlines, and teacher-centred solutions. Autonomy support does not mean removing structure: students are most engaged when teachers combine choice and voice with clear goals, guidance, feedback, and dependable expectations. The review argues that teachers can learn a more supportive motivating style and that it contributes to engagement, internalisation, well-being, and a stronger teacher–student relationship. For educators, the practical shift is often interpersonal rather than curricular: listen before directing, explain why a constraint matters, offer agency within boundaries, invite students’ thinking, and give hints that preserve ownership.
Why it matters
The article synthesises theory and prior evidence rather than testing a single classroom programme.
-
- Vol 4 RE: Chapter 18
student voicepupil participationschool improvementlearner consultationparticipatory decision-makingstudent agencyeducational relationshipsshared authorityBook Evidence summaryAt a glance
Rudduck and Flutter synthesize research in which pupils were consulted about teaching, learning, relationships, and school organization. Their central claim is that young people possess consequential knowledge of classroom life and should be treated as capable participants rather than passive objects of reform.
Key ideas
Consultation can reveal barriers adults overlook, sharpen teachers’ understanding of engagement, and change pupils’ identities from recipients to contributors. The authors distinguish listening from tokenistic surveys: credible pupil voice requires questions that matter, diverse participation, respectful dialogue, visible responses, and explanation when suggestions cannot be adopted. Benefits can occur at organizational, pedagogical, personal, and social levels, but consultation also raises issues of power, representation, confidentiality, and adult willingness to share authority. The book does not argue that pupils replace professional judgement.
Why it matters
It proposes that school improvement becomes better informed when staff systematically combine evidence, expertise, and learners’ lived experience while building relationships in which students can influence their conditions of learning.
View or buy the cited work >>Read a similar article free online >>
A transparent research trail
More than a bibliography.
What it contributes
Evidence summaries explain the central idea and why the source matters to educators.
How to access it
Entries link to lawful full text where available, or to a publisher, library or purchase page.
Edition abbreviations
- TE
- Teacher Edition
- PE
- Practice Edition
- RE
- Research Edition
Citation checks
References are checked against publisher records, scholarly indexes, DOI or ISBN metadata, repositories and author records where available. An entry marked [Citation not verified] preserves the wording found in the relevant volume without attributing findings to an unconfirmed work.
From sources to a coherent pathway