Where it is used
Each entry identifies the volume, edition, chapter or appendix in which the work appears.
The evidence behind the series
Follow the research.
Explore every source.
Browse the scientific research and professional literature used across all seven volumes of The Science of Learning for Educators.
7book volumes
8author ranges
1searchable library
Search the collection
Find a paper, author or idea.
Choose an author range, search a title or concept, or narrow the collection by source type. Open any result to see where it appears in the books, read its evidence summary and follow available source links.
3 references
-
- Vol 6 PE: App E
- Vol 6 RE: Chapter 5, App A, App D, App E
distributed leadershipleadership practiceorganizational routinesleadership artifactsprofessional learninginstructional changeBook Evidence summaryAt a glance
Spillane proposes distributed leadership as a lens for analyzing leadership practice, not a prescription that everyone should lead or that principals are unimportant. Leadership activity is stretched over multiple people, routines, tools, and situations; its unit of analysis is the interaction among leaders, followers, and the situation.
Key ideas
Formal position alone therefore does not reveal how work is accomplished. People may collaborate, work collectively but separately, or act in coordinated sequence, while artifacts such as schedules, assessment systems, protocols, and meeting routines shape what participants notice and do. The framework distinguishes distributing tasks from studying how practice emerges through interaction. It helps researchers and school leaders map responsibility, expertise, influence, and interdependence without romanticizing delegation.
Why it matters
For improvement, the question becomes not simply who owns an initiative, but how the arrangement of people and tools enables or constrains diagnosis, decision making, professional learning, and instructional change.
View or buy the cited work >>Read a similar article free online >>
-
- Vol 6 RE: Chapter 6, App D, App E
professional learning communitiescollective responsibilityprofessional inquirydistributed leadershiporganizational trustshared purposeEdited book Evidence summaryAt a glance
Stoll and Louis assemble international research that both develops and complicates the idea of a professional learning community. A PLC is more than a congenial staff or a scheduled meeting: it combines shared values and purpose, collective responsibility for pupils, reflective professional inquiry, collaboration focused on learning, and inclusive participation.
Key ideas
Chapters examine dialogue, trust, organizational memory, distributed leadership, support staff, networks, assessment, and links between professional and student learning. They also surface dilemmas involving imposed participation, superficial collaboration, conflicting purposes, exclusion, sustainability, and the temptation to label any team a community. Communities develop differently across contexts and life-cycle stages; structures such as time and routines matter, but culture and inquiry determine whether those structures improve practice. The collection therefore treats PLCs as demanding social and intellectual work.
Why it matters
Leaders should build conditions for evidence-informed challenge and shared responsibility while monitoring whose knowledge, voice, and learning remain peripheral.
View or buy the cited work >>Read a similar article free online >>
-
- Vol 4 RE: Chapter 23, App C
educational leadershipdistributed leadershipinstructional leadershipteacher leadershipcommunity participationleadership developmentshared accountabilityReport Evidence summaryAt a glance
The 2024/5 Global Education Monitoring Report examines leadership at school, middle-tier, system, political, and community levels and asks how it can advance inclusive, equitable learning. Drawing on comparative evidence and country profiles, it organises effective educational leadership around four dimensions: setting expectations, focusing on learning, fostering collaboration, and developing people.
Key ideas
Leadership effects depend on context and are distributed across many actors, not confined to formally appointed principals. The report analyses how leaders are selected, prepared, supported, given autonomy, and held accountable, noting that preparation programmes often omit one or more core dimensions and that political turnover can disrupt sustained reform. It also considers teacher leadership, student and community participation, gender disparities, crisis settings, and tensions between administrative demands and instructional priorities. Recommendations call for transparent and inclusive recruitment, professional standards, relevant preparation, continuous development, collaborative cultures, adequate resources, and governance that combines trust with accountability.
Why it matters
For schools and systems, the report cautions against heroic-leader models: improvement is more likely when capable people share purpose, attend closely to learning, build others’ expertise, and have stable conditions for collective action.
A transparent research trail
More than a bibliography.
What it contributes
Evidence summaries explain the central idea and why the source matters to educators.
How to access it
Entries link to lawful full text where available, or to a publisher, library or purchase page.
Edition abbreviations
- TE
- Teacher Edition
- PE
- Practice Edition
- RE
- Research Edition
Citation checks
References are checked against publisher records, scholarly indexes, DOI or ISBN metadata, repositories and author records where available. An entry marked [Citation not verified] preserves the wording found in the relevant volume without attributing findings to an unconfirmed work.
From sources to a coherent pathway