Where it is used
Each entry identifies the volume, edition, chapter or appendix in which the work appears.
The evidence behind the series
Browse the scientific research and professional literature used across all seven volumes of The Science of Learning for Educators.
Search the collection
Choose an author range, search a title or concept, or narrow the collection by source type. Open any result to see where it appears in the books, read its evidence summary and follow available source links.
1 reference
Tamim and colleagues use second-order meta-analysis to ask whether computer technology improves achievement in face-to-face education compared with instruction without the technology. Their systematic search yielded 25 meta-analyses with limited overlap, representing 1,055 primary studies spanning roughly four decades.
The random-effects average was positive and modest, about 0.35 standard deviations. A validation analysis using 574 independent effects extracted from 13 included meta-analyses produced a similar estimate of about 0.33. Effects varied substantially, however, and the authors stress that the average does not show technology to be an independent cause or identify a universally effective device. Differences were associated with instructional role and context: technology used to support cognition tended to outperform applications that merely presented instruction, and effects differed across educational levels and other study features.
The paper also discusses limitations in the quality, overlap, and reporting of prior meta-analyses. Its practical message is conditional: technology can support learning, but instructional purpose, pedagogy, implementation, and comparison conditions matter more than simply adding hardware or software.
A transparent research trail
Each entry identifies the volume, edition, chapter or appendix in which the work appears.
Evidence summaries explain the central idea and why the source matters to educators.
Entries link to lawful full text where available, or to a publisher, library or purchase page.
References are checked against publisher records, scholarly indexes, DOI or ISBN metadata, repositories and author records where available. An entry marked [Citation not verified] preserves the wording found in the relevant volume without attributing findings to an unconfirmed work.
From sources to a coherent pathway