Where it is used
Each entry identifies the volume, edition, chapter or appendix in which the work appears.
The evidence behind the series
Browse the scientific research and professional literature used across all seven volumes of The Science of Learning for Educators.
Search the collection
Choose an author range, search a title or concept, or narrow the collection by source type. Open any result to see where it appears in the books, read its evidence summary and follow available source links.
1 reference
Trust, Krutka, and Carpenter investigate how teachers experience professional learning networks through qualitative analysis of open-ended survey responses from 732 P–12 educators. Participants described personalised systems of people, spaces, and tools spanning face-to-face relationships and online platforms rather than a single social-media site.
Teachers used these networks to share resources, seek ideas and emotional support, ask questions, collaborate, reflect, and connect with perspectives unavailable locally. Reported benefits included continuous and self-directed learning, access across time and geography, professional affirmation, and opportunities to contribute as well as consume. Challenges included information overload, variable credibility, limited time, shallow interaction, privacy concerns, technology access, and difficulty turning connections into sustained collaboration. Because respondents were self-selected and outcomes were self-reported, the study does not demonstrate that participation causes improved teaching or student achievement.
It does show why educators value PLNs and how networked learning differs from conventional episodic professional development. For educators and leaders, useful networks require intentional curation, reciprocal participation, critical evaluation of sources, diverse ties, reflection, and conditions that help teachers translate shared ideas into classroom inquiry and evidence-informed practice.
A transparent research trail
Each entry identifies the volume, edition, chapter or appendix in which the work appears.
Evidence summaries explain the central idea and why the source matters to educators.
Entries link to lawful full text where available, or to a publisher, library or purchase page.
References are checked against publisher records, scholarly indexes, DOI or ISBN metadata, repositories and author records where available. An entry marked [Citation not verified] preserves the wording found in the relevant volume without attributing findings to an unconfirmed work.
From sources to a coherent pathway