Where it is used
Each entry identifies the volume, edition, chapter or appendix in which the work appears.
The evidence behind the series
Follow the research.
Explore every source.
Browse the scientific research and professional literature used across all seven volumes of The Science of Learning for Educators.
7book volumes
8author ranges
1searchable library
Search the collection
Find a paper, author or idea.
Choose an author range, search a title or concept, or narrow the collection by source type. Open any result to see where it appears in the books, read its evidence summary and follow available source links.
5 references
-
- Vol 3 TE: App C
conceptual changecognitive apprenticeshipscaffoldingknowledge buildingmetacognitioncollaborative learningdesign-based researchdisciplinary practicesEdited book Evidence summaryAt a glance
Sawyer’s handbook presents the learning sciences as an interdisciplinary, design-oriented field concerned with how people learn in classrooms, communities, workplaces, and technology-rich settings.
Key ideas
Across cognitive, sociocultural, and computational traditions, chapters emphasize that robust learning involves organized knowledge, participation in meaningful practices, collaboration, metacognition, and the ability to use understanding in new situations. The field studies learning as it unfolds and also designs environments intended to improve it, often through iterative design-based research. Core topics include conceptual change, cognitive apprenticeship, scaffolding, discourse, knowledge building, collaborative learning, disciplinary practices, assessment, informal learning, and educational technology. The handbook rejects a simple opposition between instruction and discovery: effective environments provide structure, representations, feedback, and guidance while learners actively explain, inquire, create, and regulate.
Why it matters
Its practical contribution is a set of complementary theories and methods for connecting fine-grained learning processes with the redesign of curricula, tools, classrooms, and educational systems.
View or buy the cited work >>Read a similar article free online >>
-
- Vol 2 RE: Chapter 14, App D, App E
- Vol 3 RE: Chapters 2, 13
conceptual changecognitive apprenticeshipscaffoldingknowledge buildingmetacognitioncollaborative learningdesign-based researchdisciplinary practicesEdited book Evidence summaryAt a glance
Sawyer’s handbook presents the learning sciences as an interdisciplinary, design-oriented field concerned with how people learn in classrooms, communities, workplaces, and technology-rich settings.
Key ideas
Across cognitive, sociocultural, and computational traditions, chapters emphasize that robust learning involves organized knowledge, participation in meaningful practices, collaboration, metacognition, and the ability to use understanding in new situations. The field studies learning as it unfolds and also designs environments intended to improve it, often through iterative design-based research. Core topics include conceptual change, cognitive apprenticeship, scaffolding, discourse, knowledge building, collaborative learning, disciplinary practices, assessment, informal learning, and educational technology. The handbook rejects a simple opposition between instruction and discovery: effective environments provide structure, representations, feedback, and guidance while learners actively explain, inquire, create, and regulate.
Why it matters
Its practical contribution is a set of complementary theories and methods for connecting fine-grained learning processes with the redesign of curricula, tools, classrooms, and educational systems.
View or buy the cited work >>Read a similar article free online >>
-
- Vol 2 RE: Chapter 14, App A, App D, App F
- Vol 3 RE: Chapters 1, 2, 3, 11, 12, App A
- Vol 3 TE: App C
- Vol 7 PE: App D
- Vol 7 RE: Chapters 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 13, 14, 15, App D
knowledge buildingepistemic agencyauthentic problemsconceptual artifactsidea diversitycollective inquiryembedded assessmentknowledge forumBook chapter Evidence summaryAt a glance
Scardamalia and Bereiter distinguish knowledge building from individual learning and ordinary project work. A knowledge-building community takes collective responsibility for advancing public ideas that can be examined, challenged, connected, and improved.
Key ideas
Students exercise epistemic agency by identifying authentic problems, proposing explanations, using authoritative sources constructively, and deciding what the community needs to understand next. Knowledge is treated as improvable conceptual artifacts rather than answers owned by individuals. Principles include real ideas and authentic problems, idea diversity, rise-above syntheses, symmetric knowledge advancement, democratizing knowledge, pervasive knowledge building, and embedded assessment. Technology such as Knowledge Forum can preserve discourse, make connections visible, and support higher-level organization, but software does not create the culture by itself.
Why it matters
The educational aim is to initiate learners into knowledge-creating practices: sustained inquiry, explanatory coherence, responsible use of evidence, and contribution to a shared intellectual frontier rather than completion of teacher-defined tasks.
View or buy the cited work >>Read a similar article free online >>
-
- Vol 2 RE: Chapter 4, 5, 6, 12
knowledge buildingknowledge creationepistemic agencyauthentic problemsconceptual artifactscollective inquiryembedded assessmentknowledge forumBook chapter Evidence summaryAt a glance
Scardamalia and Bereiter distinguish knowledge building from individual learning and ordinary project work. A knowledge-building community takes collective responsibility for advancing public ideas that can be examined, challenged, connected, and improved.
Key ideas
Students exercise epistemic agency by identifying authentic problems, proposing explanations, using authoritative sources constructively, and deciding what the community needs to understand next. Knowledge is treated as improvable conceptual artifacts rather than answers owned by individuals. Principles include real ideas and authentic problems, idea diversity, rise-above syntheses, symmetric knowledge advancement, democratizing knowledge, pervasive knowledge building, and embedded assessment. Technology such as Knowledge Forum can preserve discourse, make connections visible, and support higher-level organization, but software does not create the culture by itself.
Why it matters
The educational aim is to initiate learners into knowledge-creating practices: sustained inquiry, explanatory coherence, responsible use of evidence, and contribution to a shared intellectual frontier rather than completion of teacher-defined tasks.
View or buy the cited work >>Read a similar article free online >>
-
- Vol 6 RE: Chapters 6, 7, 14, App A, App D, App E
professional learning inquiryadaptive expertiseknowledge buildingformative assessmentcollaborative inquiryinstructional improvementunderserved learnersschool leadershipBook Evidence summaryAt a glance
Timperley reframes professional development from programmes delivered to teachers into professional learning organised around effects on students. At the book’s centre is an inquiry and knowledge-building cycle: identify what learners need to know and do; examine what educators need to learn; deepen relevant content, pedagogical, and assessment knowledge; create new learning opportunities; and evaluate what changed for students.
Key ideas
Evidence is used diagnostically rather than as a compliance score, and discrepant outcomes become reasons to investigate teaching, context, and assumptions. Professional learning must meet a double demand—offer immediately useful responses while developing adaptable principles teachers can apply to unfamiliar problems. Case examples from New Zealand, Canada, and the United Kingdom illustrate respectful but challenging dialogue, external expertise, formative assessment, collaborative inquiry, and attention to learners who have been underserved. School leaders influence whether inquiry is safe, focused, resourced, and sustained; facilitators need expertise in both content and adult learning.
Why it matters
The book rejects evaluating professional learning by participation or satisfaction alone. Its test is whether educators build adaptive expertise and create demonstrably better opportunities, engagement, learning, and well-being for students.
View or buy the cited work >>Read a similar article free online >>
A transparent research trail
More than a bibliography.
What it contributes
Evidence summaries explain the central idea and why the source matters to educators.
How to access it
Entries link to lawful full text where available, or to a publisher, library or purchase page.
Edition abbreviations
- TE
- Teacher Edition
- PE
- Practice Edition
- RE
- Research Edition
Citation checks
References are checked against publisher records, scholarly indexes, DOI or ISBN metadata, repositories and author records where available. An entry marked [Citation not verified] preserves the wording found in the relevant volume without attributing findings to an unconfirmed work.
From sources to a coherent pathway