Where it is used
Each entry identifies the volume, edition, chapter or appendix in which the work appears.
The evidence behind the series
Follow the research.
Explore every source.
Browse the scientific research and professional literature used across all seven volumes of The Science of Learning for Educators.
7book volumes
8author ranges
1searchable library
Search the collection
Find a paper, author or idea.
Choose an author range, search a title or concept, or narrow the collection by source type. Open any result to see where it appears in the books, read its evidence summary and follow available source links.
3 references
-
- Vol 4 RE: Chapters 12, 18, App A, App C
self-regulation promptslearning analyticstrace datatransfer performanceadaptive promptingdigital learning environmentsinstructional contextJournal article Evidence summaryAt a glance
This quasi-experimental study examines whether prompts embedded in a digital learning environment can activate self-regulation strategies and whether learning-analytics trace data can explain performance. A sample of 110 higher-education students received prompts targeting cognitive, metacognitive, motivational, or resource-management processes, or participated in a control condition.
Key ideas
The researchers compared declarative knowledge, transfer, learner perceptions, and recorded online behavior. Prompting produced small effects on declarative knowledge and transfer, and prompted groups interacted with the environment differently from the control group. However, the available trace measures did not explain transfer performance sufficiently, illustrating the gap between logging observable clicks and inferring the cognitive or motivational processes that matter for learning. The authors conclude that prompts have potential as lightweight support for self-regulated learning, but learning analytics must be more closely tied to theory and instructional context.
Why it matters
They call for studies of adaptive rather than fixed prompts, richer interpretations of trace data, authentic learning settings, and closer attention to how individual learners perceive and respond to interventions.
View or buy the cited work >>Read a similar article free online >>
-
- Vol 4 RE: Chapter 6
self-regulated learningsocially shared regulationcollaborative learningadaptive learning environmentslearning analyticsfeedback scaffoldinghelp seekinglearner agencyJournal article Evidence summaryAt a glance
Sharma, Nguyen, and Hong systematically review empirical studies connecting adaptive digital learning environments with self-regulated and socially shared regulation in collaborative learning. Their search and coding identify seven recurring objectives: feedback and scaffolding, regulatory skills and strategies, learning trajectories, collaborative processes, adaptation and regulation, self-assessment, and help seeking.
Key ideas
Adaptive systems can personalize prompts, representations, feedback, and paths, while collaboration introduces collective planning, monitoring, control, and reflection that cannot be inferred from individual traces alone. The literature uses heterogeneous theoretical models, settings, technologies, and measures, limiting cumulative conclusions. Important gaps include few informal-learning studies, weak theoretical convergence between individual and shared regulation, and difficulty monitoring how regulation is coordinated across group members. The authors call for clearer constructs, multimodal and process-sensitive measures, and designs that support rather than automate learner agency.
Why it matters
The review provides a map of opportunities but does not establish that adaptation by itself improves regulation or collaboration.
-
- Vol 5 RE: Chapter 10
differentiated instructionlearner variabilityhigh-quality curriculumflexible groupingresponsive assessmentlearning environmentinstructional scaffoldinginclusive practiceBook Evidence summaryAt a glance
Tomlinson develops a model of classrooms that respond systematically to differences in readiness, interest, experience, language, and preferred ways of learning while preserving ambitious common goals. Differentiation rests on high-quality curriculum: clear concepts and essential understandings, engaging tasks, and assessment aligned with what matters.
Key ideas
Teachers use ongoing evidence to vary content, learning processes, products, support, pace, materials, and grouping rather than assign permanent ability tracks. The second edition places particular emphasis on learning environments characterised by respect, belonging, shared responsibility, growth, and teaching that “teaches up”—planning rich, complex work first and adding scaffolds so more learners can participate. Detailed classroom cases illustrate how teachers build routines, use flexible groups, connect learning with students’ interests, and balance whole-class community with individual response. Differentiation is not individualisation for every moment, a collection of entertaining activities, or easier work for selected learners.
Why it matters
It is continual adjustment of curriculum, instruction, environment, and assessment so each learner encounters appropriate challenge and support. The book also addresses standards, accountability, technology, English learners, and the gradual professional learning required to make responsive practice coherent and manageable.
View or buy the cited work >>Read a similar article free online >>
A transparent research trail
More than a bibliography.
What it contributes
Evidence summaries explain the central idea and why the source matters to educators.
How to access it
Entries link to lawful full text where available, or to a publisher, library or purchase page.
Edition abbreviations
- TE
- Teacher Edition
- PE
- Practice Edition
- RE
- Research Edition
Citation checks
References are checked against publisher records, scholarly indexes, DOI or ISBN metadata, repositories and author records where available. An entry marked [Citation not verified] preserves the wording found in the relevant volume without attributing findings to an unconfirmed work.
From sources to a coherent pathway