Where it is used
Each entry identifies the volume, edition, chapter or appendix in which the work appears.
The evidence behind the series
Follow the research.
Explore every source.
Browse the scientific research and professional literature used across all seven volumes of The Science of Learning for Educators.
7book volumes
8author ranges
1searchable library
Search the collection
Find a paper, author or idea.
Choose an author range, search a title or concept, or narrow the collection by source type. Open any result to see where it appears in the books, read its evidence summary and follow available source links.
2 references
-
- Vol 2 RE: Chapter 13
- Vol 4 RE: Chapter 23, App B, App C
systems thinkinglearning organizationspersonal masterymental modelsshared visionteam learningsystems archetypesBook Evidence summaryAt a glance
Senge describes a learning organization as one that continually expands its capacity to create desired results. Five interdependent disciplines support that capacity: personal mastery develops commitment to learning; mental models make governing assumptions discussable; shared vision builds common purpose; team learning uses dialogue and coordinated inquiry; and systems thinking connects events through feedback, delays, accumulation, and recurring structures.
Key ideas
Systems thinking is the “fifth discipline” because it integrates the others and counters fragmented explanations. The book uses archetypes such as shifting the burden, limits to growth, and fixes that fail to show why well-intended local actions can produce delayed, system-wide harm. Learning requires surfacing defensive routines, testing assumptions, and balancing advocacy with inquiry. Leadership is reframed as designing conditions, stewarding purpose, and helping people see wholes.
Why it matters
The revised edition adds implementation experience while retaining the central warning that durable improvement comes from changing structures and learning relationships, not reacting faster to isolated symptoms.
View or buy the cited work >>Read a similar article free online >>
-
- Vol 6 PE: App E
- Vol 6 RE: Chapters 1, 2, 3, 14, App A, App B, App D, App E
- Vol 7 RE: Chapter 15, App D
systems thinkinglearning organizationspersonal masterymental modelsshared visionteam learningsystems archetypesBook Evidence summaryAt a glance
Senge describes a learning organization as one that continually expands its capacity to create desired results. Five interdependent disciplines support that capacity: personal mastery develops commitment to learning; mental models make governing assumptions discussable; shared vision builds common purpose; team learning uses dialogue and coordinated inquiry; and systems thinking connects events through feedback, delays, accumulation, and recurring structures.
Key ideas
Systems thinking is the “fifth discipline” because it integrates the others and counters fragmented explanations. The book uses archetypes such as shifting the burden, limits to growth, and fixes that fail to show why well-intended local actions can produce delayed, system-wide harm. Learning requires surfacing defensive routines, testing assumptions, and balancing advocacy with inquiry. Leadership is reframed as designing conditions, stewarding purpose, and helping people see wholes.
Why it matters
The revised edition adds implementation experience while retaining the central warning that durable improvement comes from changing structures and learning relationships, not reacting faster to isolated symptoms.
View or buy the cited work >>Read a similar article free online >>
A transparent research trail
More than a bibliography.
What it contributes
Evidence summaries explain the central idea and why the source matters to educators.
How to access it
Entries link to lawful full text where available, or to a publisher, library or purchase page.
Edition abbreviations
- TE
- Teacher Edition
- PE
- Practice Edition
- RE
- Research Edition
Citation checks
References are checked against publisher records, scholarly indexes, DOI or ISBN metadata, repositories and author records where available. An entry marked [Citation not verified] preserves the wording found in the relevant volume without attributing findings to an unconfirmed work.
From sources to a coherent pathway