Where it is used
Each entry identifies the volume, edition, chapter or appendix in which the work appears.
The evidence behind the series
Follow the research.
Explore every source.
Browse the scientific research and professional literature used across all seven volumes of The Science of Learning for Educators.
7book volumes
8author ranges
1searchable library
Search the collection
Find a paper, author or idea.
Choose an author range, search a title or concept, or narrow the collection by source type. Open any result to see where it appears in the books, read its evidence summary and follow available source links.
2 references
-
- Vol 6 PE: App E
- Vol 6 RE: Chapter 8
teaching culturemathematics instructionlesson studyteacher collaborationinstructional improvementclassroom observationBook Evidence summaryAt a glance
Stigler and Hiebert use TIMSS video studies to compare recurring mathematics lessons in the United States, Germany, and Japan. They argue that teaching is a cultural activity: shared scripts make classroom routines feel natural and render alternatives difficult to see.
Key ideas
Typical patterns differed in the role of problems, student struggle, explanation, and connections among mathematical ideas. The authors caution against ranking individual teachers from brief observations or importing visible techniques without their supporting system. The “teaching gap” is sustained because improvement in the United States often relies on episodic reforms and individual heroics rather than a profession-wide mechanism for refining lessons. Japanese lesson study illustrates a different knowledge-building cycle in which teachers plan, observe, analyze, revise, and share classroom lessons.
Why it matters
The book’s enduring proposal is to treat teaching as improvable collective practice and to develop a public, cumulative knowledge base grounded in evidence from actual lessons.
View or buy the cited work >>Read a similar article free online >>
-
- Vol 6 RE: Chapter 8
lesson studycollaborative lesson researchresearch lessonskyozaikenkyustudent thinkingpost-lesson discussionteacher professional learningJournal article Evidence summaryAt a glance
Takahashi and McDougal describe Collaborative Lesson Research as a form of Japanese lesson study designed to maximise professional learning and instructional improvement. It is more than jointly writing and observing one lesson.
Key ideas
A team begins with a school-wide research theme and a specific research question grounded in evidence about students, studies curriculum and relevant scholarship, develops a detailed research proposal, conducts a live research lesson, and holds a carefully structured post-lesson discussion focused on student thinking. A knowledgeable other can connect observations with disciplinary content, curriculum, and research. The cycle may include revision and another research lesson, and findings are documented and shared. Weak implementations often omit kyozaikenkyu—the deep study of materials, content, and anticipated student responses—or turn observations into evaluations of the teacher.
Why it matters
Collaborative Lesson Research instead treats the lesson as a jointly owned investigation. For schools, effectiveness requires protected time, a consequential shared question, evidence collection planned in advance, discussion anchored in observed learning rather than preference, outside expertise where useful, and sustained cycles linked to long-term goals.
A transparent research trail
More than a bibliography.
What it contributes
Evidence summaries explain the central idea and why the source matters to educators.
How to access it
Entries link to lawful full text where available, or to a publisher, library or purchase page.
Edition abbreviations
- TE
- Teacher Edition
- PE
- Practice Edition
- RE
- Research Edition
Citation checks
References are checked against publisher records, scholarly indexes, DOI or ISBN metadata, repositories and author records where available. An entry marked [Citation not verified] preserves the wording found in the relevant volume without attributing findings to an unconfirmed work.
From sources to a coherent pathway