Where it is used
Each entry identifies the volume, edition, chapter or appendix in which the work appears.
The evidence behind the series
Follow the research.
Explore every source.
Browse the scientific research and professional literature used across all seven volumes of The Science of Learning for Educators.
7book volumes
8author ranges
1searchable library
Search the collection
Find a paper, author or idea.
Choose an author range, search a title or concept, or narrow the collection by source type. Open any result to see where it appears in the books, read its evidence summary and follow available source links.
8 references
-
- Vol 6 PE: App E
- Vol 6 RE: Chapter 5, App A, App D, App E
distributed leadershipleadership practiceorganizational routinesleadership artifactsprofessional learninginstructional changeBook Evidence summaryAt a glance
Spillane proposes distributed leadership as a lens for analyzing leadership practice, not a prescription that everyone should lead or that principals are unimportant. Leadership activity is stretched over multiple people, routines, tools, and situations; its unit of analysis is the interaction among leaders, followers, and the situation.
Key ideas
Formal position alone therefore does not reveal how work is accomplished. People may collaborate, work collectively but separately, or act in coordinated sequence, while artifacts such as schedules, assessment systems, protocols, and meeting routines shape what participants notice and do. The framework distinguishes distributing tasks from studying how practice emerges through interaction. It helps researchers and school leaders map responsibility, expertise, influence, and interdependence without romanticizing delegation.
Why it matters
For improvement, the question becomes not simply who owns an initiative, but how the arrangement of people and tools enables or constrains diagnosis, decision making, professional learning, and instructional change.
View or buy the cited work >>Read a similar article free online >>
-
- Vol 6 RE: Chapter 6, App D, App E
professional learning communitiescollective responsibilityprofessional inquirydistributed leadershiporganizational trustshared purposeEdited book Evidence summaryAt a glance
Stoll and Louis assemble international research that both develops and complicates the idea of a professional learning community. A PLC is more than a congenial staff or a scheduled meeting: it combines shared values and purpose, collective responsibility for pupils, reflective professional inquiry, collaboration focused on learning, and inclusive participation.
Key ideas
Chapters examine dialogue, trust, organizational memory, distributed leadership, support staff, networks, assessment, and links between professional and student learning. They also surface dilemmas involving imposed participation, superficial collaboration, conflicting purposes, exclusion, sustainability, and the temptation to label any team a community. Communities develop differently across contexts and life-cycle stages; structures such as time and routines matter, but culture and inquiry determine whether those structures improve practice. The collection therefore treats PLCs as demanding social and intellectual work.
Why it matters
Leaders should build conditions for evidence-informed challenge and shared responsibility while monitoring whose knowledge, voice, and learning remain peripheral.
View or buy the cited work >>Read a similar article free online >>
-
- Vol 6 RE: Chapter 8
lesson studycollaborative lesson researchresearch lessonskyozaikenkyustudent thinkingpost-lesson discussionteacher professional learningJournal article Evidence summaryAt a glance
Takahashi and McDougal describe Collaborative Lesson Research as a form of Japanese lesson study designed to maximise professional learning and instructional improvement. It is more than jointly writing and observing one lesson.
Key ideas
A team begins with a school-wide research theme and a specific research question grounded in evidence about students, studies curriculum and relevant scholarship, develops a detailed research proposal, conducts a live research lesson, and holds a carefully structured post-lesson discussion focused on student thinking. A knowledgeable other can connect observations with disciplinary content, curriculum, and research. The cycle may include revision and another research lesson, and findings are documented and shared. Weak implementations often omit kyozaikenkyu—the deep study of materials, content, and anticipated student responses—or turn observations into evaluations of the teacher.
Why it matters
Collaborative Lesson Research instead treats the lesson as a jointly owned investigation. For schools, effectiveness requires protected time, a consequential shared question, evidence collection planned in advance, discussion anchored in observed learning rather than preference, outside expertise where useful, and sustained cycles linked to long-term goals.
-
- Vol 5 RE: Chapter 12
data-based decision makingteacher data literacyformative assessment datainstructional adaptationstudent groupingprofessional learning supportcollaborative inquiryimplementation sustainabilityJournal article Evidence summaryAt a glance
Tayem and Bourgeois map how K–12 teachers use data-based decision making and what is known about training, practice, and outcomes. Their scoping review identifies geographic and temporal concentrations in the literature, especially studies from the United States and the Netherlands and clusters published during 2016–2017 and 2020–2022.
Key ideas
Research has focused more on elementary and in-person settings than secondary or online schooling. Across studies, teachers use assessment and other data to identify learner needs, set goals, select or adjust instruction, group students, and monitor progress. Interventions can improve teachers’ data use and sometimes student outcomes, but implementation is constrained by data literacy, beliefs, time, access to usable information, collaboration, leadership, and the alignment of tools with instructional work. One-off training is unlikely to sustain change; teachers benefit from continuing support that joins technical analysis with pedagogical interpretation and opportunities to act on findings.
Why it matters
The authors highlight uneven terminology and methods and call for research in underrepresented contexts, stronger outcome designs, and attention to long-term sustainability. Data should inform professional judgement rather than mechanically dictate decisions.
-
- Vol 6 PE: App E
- Vol 6 RE: Chapters 4, 6, 7
teacher professional learninginquiry cyclesstudent outcome evidencepedagogical content knowledgeexternal expertiseprofessional communitiesinstructional changeleadership supportReport Evidence summaryAt a glance
Timperley distils a best-evidence synthesis of professional development associated with improved student outcomes into ten research-informed principles. Effective professional learning lasts long enough for meaningful change, engages external expertise when needed, and keeps links between teaching activity and valued student outcomes explicit.
Key ideas
Teachers need opportunities to integrate new knowledge with existing beliefs, test ideas in practice, examine evidence about learners, and discuss the implications with colleagues. Content knowledge and knowledge of how students learn particular content matter; generic activities alone are insufficient. Leaders support change by organising time, resources, expectations, and learning conditions, while professional communities become useful when their conversations challenge ineffective assumptions rather than merely reinforce current practice. The booklet rejects a single delivery format: impact depends on the learning processes a design elicits and its responsiveness to context.
Why it matters
It proposes a recurring inquiry cycle in which teachers identify learner needs, determine their own learning needs, deepen knowledge, try new actions, and assess effects. For schools, professional learning should therefore be evaluated through changes in teaching and diverse learners’ outcomes, not attendance or satisfaction alone.
-
- Vol 6 RE: Chapters 6, 7, 14, App A, App D, App E
professional learning inquiryadaptive expertiseknowledge buildingformative assessmentcollaborative inquiryinstructional improvementunderserved learnersschool leadershipBook Evidence summaryAt a glance
Timperley reframes professional development from programmes delivered to teachers into professional learning organised around effects on students. At the book’s centre is an inquiry and knowledge-building cycle: identify what learners need to know and do; examine what educators need to learn; deepen relevant content, pedagogical, and assessment knowledge; create new learning opportunities; and evaluate what changed for students.
Key ideas
Evidence is used diagnostically rather than as a compliance score, and discrepant outcomes become reasons to investigate teaching, context, and assumptions. Professional learning must meet a double demand—offer immediately useful responses while developing adaptable principles teachers can apply to unfamiliar problems. Case examples from New Zealand, Canada, and the United Kingdom illustrate respectful but challenging dialogue, external expertise, formative assessment, collaborative inquiry, and attention to learners who have been underserved. School leaders influence whether inquiry is safe, focused, resourced, and sustained; facilitators need expertise in both content and adult learning.
Why it matters
The book rejects evaluating professional learning by participation or satisfaction alone. Its test is whether educators build adaptive expertise and create demonstrably better opportunities, engagement, learning, and well-being for students.
View or buy the cited work >>Read a similar article free online >>
-
- Vol 6 RE: App B, App D
teacher professional learningstudent outcome evidencepedagogical content knowledgeinstructional changeprofessional communitiesexternal expertiseequity-oriented practiceorganizational conditionsReport Evidence summaryAt a glance
This New Zealand Best Evidence Synthesis examines how teachers’ professional learning can change teaching and improve valued outcomes for diverse students. Its core analysis draws on 97 studies reporting student outcomes, supplemented by wider evidence used to explain how and why effects occurred.
Key ideas
The synthesis finds no universally superior workshop structure or programme type. Stronger approaches establish explicit links between professional learning, teaching practices, and learner outcomes; provide substantial engagement with relevant content and pedagogical knowledge; use evidence to identify needs and track impact; and offer skilled challenge and support, often through external expertise. Teachers need opportunities to examine prior assumptions, learn alternative practices, integrate theory and practice, and participate in professional communities focused on consequential problems. Organisational leadership, time, coherence, and sustained conditions influence whether changes endure.
Why it matters
The report also attends to equity, including outcomes for learners historically underserved by schooling and obligations within Aotearoa New Zealand. Its practical implication is an inquiry orientation: begin with what students need, identify what educators must learn, undertake focused learning and action, then evaluate whether outcomes improve and revise accordingly.
-
- Vol 6 RE: Chapters 6, 12, App D
- Vol 7 RE: Chapters 14, 16, App D
professional learning networksteacher collaborationself-directed professional developmentnetworked learningpeer supportinformation evaluationreciprocal participationJournal article Evidence summaryAt a glance
Trust, Krutka, and Carpenter investigate how teachers experience professional learning networks through qualitative analysis of open-ended survey responses from 732 P–12 educators. Participants described personalised systems of people, spaces, and tools spanning face-to-face relationships and online platforms rather than a single social-media site.
Key ideas
Teachers used these networks to share resources, seek ideas and emotional support, ask questions, collaborate, reflect, and connect with perspectives unavailable locally. Reported benefits included continuous and self-directed learning, access across time and geography, professional affirmation, and opportunities to contribute as well as consume. Challenges included information overload, variable credibility, limited time, shallow interaction, privacy concerns, technology access, and difficulty turning connections into sustained collaboration. Because respondents were self-selected and outcomes were self-reported, the study does not demonstrate that participation causes improved teaching or student achievement.
Why it matters
It does show why educators value PLNs and how networked learning differs from conventional episodic professional development. For educators and leaders, useful networks require intentional curation, reciprocal participation, critical evaluation of sources, diverse ties, reflection, and conditions that help teachers translate shared ideas into classroom inquiry and evidence-informed practice.
A transparent research trail
More than a bibliography.
What it contributes
Evidence summaries explain the central idea and why the source matters to educators.
How to access it
Entries link to lawful full text where available, or to a publisher, library or purchase page.
Edition abbreviations
- TE
- Teacher Edition
- PE
- Practice Edition
- RE
- Research Edition
Citation checks
References are checked against publisher records, scholarly indexes, DOI or ISBN metadata, repositories and author records where available. An entry marked [Citation not verified] preserves the wording found in the relevant volume without attributing findings to an unconfirmed work.
From sources to a coherent pathway