Where it is used
Each entry identifies the volume, edition, chapter or appendix in which the work appears.
The evidence behind the series
Follow the research.
Explore every source.
Browse the scientific research and professional literature used across all seven volumes of The Science of Learning for Educators.
7book volumes
8author ranges
1searchable library
Search the collection
Find a paper, author or idea.
Choose an author range, search a title or concept, or narrow the collection by source type. Open any result to see where it appears in the books, read its evidence summary and follow available source links.
2 references
-
- Vol 6 PE: App E
- Vol 6 RE: Chapter 8
teaching culturemathematics instructionlesson studyteacher collaborationinstructional improvementclassroom observationBook Evidence summaryAt a glance
Stigler and Hiebert use TIMSS video studies to compare recurring mathematics lessons in the United States, Germany, and Japan. They argue that teaching is a cultural activity: shared scripts make classroom routines feel natural and render alternatives difficult to see.
Key ideas
Typical patterns differed in the role of problems, student struggle, explanation, and connections among mathematical ideas. The authors caution against ranking individual teachers from brief observations or importing visible techniques without their supporting system. The “teaching gap” is sustained because improvement in the United States often relies on episodic reforms and individual heroics rather than a profession-wide mechanism for refining lessons. Japanese lesson study illustrates a different knowledge-building cycle in which teachers plan, observe, analyze, revise, and share classroom lessons.
Why it matters
The book’s enduring proposal is to treat teaching as improvable collective practice and to develop a public, cumulative knowledge base grounded in evidence from actual lessons.
View or buy the cited work >>Read a similar article free online >>
-
- Vol 6 RE: Chapters 6, 12, App D
- Vol 7 RE: Chapters 14, 16, App D
professional learning networksteacher collaborationself-directed professional developmentnetworked learningpeer supportinformation evaluationreciprocal participationJournal article Evidence summaryAt a glance
Trust, Krutka, and Carpenter investigate how teachers experience professional learning networks through qualitative analysis of open-ended survey responses from 732 P–12 educators. Participants described personalised systems of people, spaces, and tools spanning face-to-face relationships and online platforms rather than a single social-media site.
Key ideas
Teachers used these networks to share resources, seek ideas and emotional support, ask questions, collaborate, reflect, and connect with perspectives unavailable locally. Reported benefits included continuous and self-directed learning, access across time and geography, professional affirmation, and opportunities to contribute as well as consume. Challenges included information overload, variable credibility, limited time, shallow interaction, privacy concerns, technology access, and difficulty turning connections into sustained collaboration. Because respondents were self-selected and outcomes were self-reported, the study does not demonstrate that participation causes improved teaching or student achievement.
Why it matters
It does show why educators value PLNs and how networked learning differs from conventional episodic professional development. For educators and leaders, useful networks require intentional curation, reciprocal participation, critical evaluation of sources, diverse ties, reflection, and conditions that help teachers translate shared ideas into classroom inquiry and evidence-informed practice.
A transparent research trail
More than a bibliography.
What it contributes
Evidence summaries explain the central idea and why the source matters to educators.
How to access it
Entries link to lawful full text where available, or to a publisher, library or purchase page.
Edition abbreviations
- TE
- Teacher Edition
- PE
- Practice Edition
- RE
- Research Edition
Citation checks
References are checked against publisher records, scholarly indexes, DOI or ISBN metadata, repositories and author records where available. An entry marked [Citation not verified] preserves the wording found in the relevant volume without attributing findings to an unconfirmed work.
From sources to a coherent pathway