Where it is used
Each entry identifies the volume, edition, chapter or appendix in which the work appears.
The evidence behind the series
Follow the research.
Explore every source.
Browse the scientific research and professional literature used across all seven volumes of The Science of Learning for Educators.
7book volumes
8author ranges
1searchable library
Search the collection
Find a paper, author or idea.
Choose an author range, search a title or concept, or narrow the collection by source type. Open any result to see where it appears in the books, read its evidence summary and follow available source links.
3 references
-
- Vol 4 RE: Chapters 21, 24, App A, App C
positive emotionengagementinterpersonal relationshipsmeaning in lifeaccomplishmentwell-beingpositive psychologyBook Evidence summaryAt a glance
Seligman revises his earlier focus on authentic happiness into a plural theory of well-being. Well-being is not a single feeling and has no sole measure; it is built from five elements summarized as PERMA: positive emotion, engagement, relationships, meaning, and accomplishment.
Key ideas
People may pursue each element for its own sake, and different profiles can support flourishing. The book connects this framework to positive-psychology interventions, education, resilience training, psychotherapy, health, organizations, and public policy. Exercises involving gratitude, strengths, constructive responding, and meaning are presented as practices whose effects should be tested rather than accepted as inspiration alone. Seligman distinguishes relieving disorder from building capability and argues that institutions should assess and cultivate strengths as well as repair deficits.
Why it matters
Critics may question measurement and cultural assumptions, but the framework’s educational value lies in broadening success beyond mood or grades while keeping proposed practices open to empirical evaluation.
View or buy the cited work >>Read a similar article free online >>
-
- Vol 4 RE: Chapter 25
ai literacyself-regulated learninggenerative artificial intelligencewriting performancestudent well-beingstructural equation modelingai ethicsJournal article Evidence summaryAt a glance
Shi, Liu, and Hu investigate associations among AI literacy, self-regulated learning, perceived writing performance, and well-being in generative-AI-supported higher education. Survey responses from 257 university students in China were analyzed with structural equation modeling.
Key ideas
Both AI literacy and self-regulated learning positively predicted students’ perceived writing performance, with self-regulation showing the stronger association. AI literacy also had a positive relationship with generative-AI-related well-being, and writing performance partially mediated that relationship. The model brings technological competence and strategic learning behavior together rather than treating tool knowledge as sufficient on its own. For teaching, the results support developing students’ ability to plan, monitor, and reflect while also teaching awareness, effective use, evaluation, and ethics of AI.
Why it matters
Important limits temper the findings: measures were self-reported, the writing-performance scale had modest reliability, the sample came from one national context, and the cross-sectional design cannot establish causal effects. The study therefore indicates relationships worth supporting and testing, not proof that AI literacy or AI use automatically improves writing or psychological well-being.
-
- Vol 6 RE: Chapters 1, 4, 6, App E
job demands–resources modelteacher well-beingteacher motivationtime pressureprofessional autonomyteacher retentionJournal article Evidence summaryAt a glance
Skaalvik and Skaalvik test a job-demands–resources model with survey data from 760 Norwegian teachers in grades 1–10. Demands include time pressure, discipline problems, low student motivation, value conflict, and role ambiguity; resources include autonomy, supervisory support, colleague relations, collective culture, and value consonance.
Key ideas
Structural equation analyses show that an overall demands factor strongly predicts lower teacher well-being, while resources more moderately predict higher well-being. Well-being in turn predicts greater engagement and less motivation to leave teaching. Among specific demands, time pressure has the strongest negative association with well-being. The findings distinguish conditions that consume sustained effort from conditions that help teachers reach goals, cope, and develop professionally.
Why it matters
Because the study is cross-sectional and based on self-report, causal direction cannot be established. Still, it directs school improvement beyond individual resilience: workload, role clarity, relational support, shared values, and professional autonomy are organizational conditions tied to motivation and retention.
A transparent research trail
More than a bibliography.
What it contributes
Evidence summaries explain the central idea and why the source matters to educators.
How to access it
Entries link to lawful full text where available, or to a publisher, library or purchase page.
Edition abbreviations
- TE
- Teacher Edition
- PE
- Practice Edition
- RE
- Research Edition
Citation checks
References are checked against publisher records, scholarly indexes, DOI or ISBN metadata, repositories and author records where available. An entry marked [Citation not verified] preserves the wording found in the relevant volume without attributing findings to an unconfirmed work.
From sources to a coherent pathway