Where it is used
Each entry identifies the volume, edition, chapter or appendix in which the work appears.
The evidence behind the series
Browse the scientific research and professional literature used across all seven volumes of The Science of Learning for Educators.
Search the collection
Choose an author range, search a title or concept, or narrow the collection by source type. Open any result to see where it appears in the books, read its evidence summary and follow available source links.
1 reference
Wise and Schwarz consult the computer-supported collaborative learning community to provoke debate about the field’s identity and future. Eight paired dialogues present opposing positions rather than recommendations.
They question whether CSCL needs one unifying framework; whether learner agency should take priority over scripted collaboration; and how rigorously researchers should decide that collaboration or community exists. Further provocations ask whether analytic and interpretive traditions should be reconciled, whether computational approaches deserve greater emphasis, whether learning analytics and adaptive support should become priorities, and whether the field must engage social media and learning at scale. The final exchange challenges the ambition to produce educational-system change. Each “provocateur” is answered by a “conciliator” defending achievements and complexities in existing traditions.
The article arises from interviews and interactive presentations, not an empirical test, and intentionally offers no resolution. Its value is diagnostic: make assumptions about collaboration explicit, examine agency and power, justify units and methods of analysis, connect small-group theory with new scales, and decide how scholarly identity relates to educational impact.
A transparent research trail
Each entry identifies the volume, edition, chapter or appendix in which the work appears.
Evidence summaries explain the central idea and why the source matters to educators.
Entries link to lawful full text where available, or to a publisher, library or purchase page.
References are checked against publisher records, scholarly indexes, DOI or ISBN metadata, repositories and author records where available. An entry marked [Citation not verified] preserves the wording found in the relevant volume without attributing findings to an unconfirmed work.
From sources to a coherent pathway