Where it is used
Each entry identifies the volume, edition, chapter or appendix in which the work appears.
The evidence behind the series
Browse the scientific research and professional literature used across all seven volumes of The Science of Learning for Educators.
Search the collection
Choose an author range, search a title or concept, or narrow the collection by source type. Open any result to see where it appears in the books, read its evidence summary and follow available source links.
1 reference
Webb reviews how forms of interaction—not group work itself—predict learning in peer groups. A central distinction is between answers or low-level assistance and elaborated explanations that show reasoning, connect ideas, or describe how to proceed.
Receiving help supports learning when it is relevant, understandable, and explanatory, and when the recipient attends to it and applies it independently. Giving explanations can also benefit the helper through organisation and elaboration of knowledge. Unanswered requests, inappropriate responses, passive participation, and copying without understanding are unlikely to help. Interaction patterns vary with prior achievement, gender, personality, group composition, task structure, status, and social dynamics, so observed outcome differences cannot be attributed to one group label alone. The review highlights sequences of behaviour—request, response, interpretation, application, and follow-up—as more informative than counts of talk.
For educators, productive collaboration requires tasks worth explaining, norms for requesting and offering conceptual help, individual accountability, equitable access to participation, monitoring of status effects, and teaching students how to respond to assistance. Assessment should examine both group discourse and what individuals can subsequently do without help.
View or buy the cited work >>Read a similar article free online >>
A transparent research trail
Each entry identifies the volume, edition, chapter or appendix in which the work appears.
Evidence summaries explain the central idea and why the source matters to educators.
Entries link to lawful full text where available, or to a publisher, library or purchase page.
References are checked against publisher records, scholarly indexes, DOI or ISBN metadata, repositories and author records where available. An entry marked [Citation not verified] preserves the wording found in the relevant volume without attributing findings to an unconfirmed work.
From sources to a coherent pathway